Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Женя Арутюнов

Channel

Женя Арутюнов

@arutyunov2025

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,815subscribers

+48 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002509283706
TypeChannel
Username@arutyunov2025
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/arutyunov2025

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7661,8211,793.56 August 2026 — 1,767 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,767 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,766 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,781 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,783 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,786 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,793 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,808 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,803 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,813 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,821 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,818 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,815 subscribers1,8156 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 44 days, net +48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,758–1,829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:551,815-3
14 Sept 2026, 23:591,818-3
11 Sept 2026, 04:401,821+8
5 Sept 2026, 23:001,813+10
2 Sept 2026, 07:041,803-5
30 Aug 2026, 10:241,808+15
27 Aug 2026, 07:251,793+7
23 Aug 2026, 21:171,786+3
16 Aug 2026, 15:521,783+2
12 Aug 2026, 20:561,781+15
9 Aug 2026, 10:311,766-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:201,767no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:181,767first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

722 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤28839.9%
😁21329.5%
💯12016.6%
🔥182.49%
🤡141.94%
💩111.52%
🤨111.52%
🍓101.39%
👍91.25%
🥰81.11%
😢40.554%
🤝40.554%
🥴40.554%
🌚30.416%
💔30.416%
❤‍🔥10.139%
👌10.139%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 722 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC604 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья! Последние несколько месяцев я работаю над одним продуктом (а точнее, как обычно у нас максимально солидная команда, и мы вместе работаем над одним продуктом). И вот пришло время для бета-тестирования. Этот продукт очень важен для меня лично. Это как если бы моя книга «Сложный дизайнер» была не книгой, а чем-то, что ежедневно помогает действовать. Это как если бы моя консультация всегда была фоново с вами и м…

🔥12❤6😢4💩1

3 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC717 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤12😁6

3 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC701 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Объяснительного поста не будет, в каментах ребята всё прекрасно объяснили, спасибо. Вера в человечество восстановлена (за рекордные 36 минут)!

❤2

3 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC758 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Срочно в номер! Свод правил как быть надменным мудаком доставлен под видом психологической поддержки прямо мне в ленту. Не думал, что людей надо учить чему-то такому и говорить «с вами всё в порядке, вы просто компетентны, только и всего». Но вот оказывается что. (Возможно, требуются объяснения, что не так с этой роскошной дамой? Тогда попозже. Да вы скорее всего и сами понимаете.)

3 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC804 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот что вы за люди такие. Вы не выбрали категории кэшбэка. Работники без премии останутся. Стыдно должно быть.

😁30🤡3

1 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC898 views79 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Выберите категории кэшбэка, умоляю

💯37❤18😁14🥰6🤡4

28 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,430 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я довольно давно нахожусь в конфликте по поводу одного карьерного вопросика, давайте его обсудим. Я хочу консультировать людей. Мне это нужно самому. Я люблю ситуацию, когда я не успел ещё погрязнуть в обязательствах, не успел оказаться с клиентом ситуации, когда нам ну как бы есть за что ценить друг друга и есть за что простить друг друга и на этом всё держится — а наоборот, это ситуация, когда я неуязвим, бесподоб…

❤20👍5

21 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC≈1,370 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну про чихание как-то поинтереснее, да? Как я погляжу. Больше экспертных мнений, больше энгейджмента.

😁38💯5🤡4🌚3

21 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC≈1,600 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот делает кто-то что-то не так в вашей команде. Вы можете подумать: — вот это он мудак; — вот это он криворукий. И ещё вы можете подумать — вот это он ни фига не понимает; — вот это он не тащит. Иными словами, вы можете приписать ему: 1. Злонамеренность, какой-то встроенный неправильный характер, а если копать глубже, то ценностные расхождения с вами. 2. Некомпетентность, низкие стандарты качества. 3. Неосведомлё…

❤63💯24👍3🔥2🥰2❤‍🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC≈1,110 views85 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребят, делайте что хотите.

😁72❤9🤝4

20 Jul 2026, 11:37 UTC≈1,130 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У меня такая особенность, что я всегда чихаю раза 3-4. Чтобы попасить в группу «полный идиот» человеку достаточно сказать мне «будь здоров» на каждый чих. И такой прям в каждом коллективе найдется. В итоге он и меня сбивает и раскручивает мое неудобство превращая обычный мой чих в свой перфоманс. Спасибо каждому, кто не говорит «будь здоров»

❤27

20 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,060 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Имхо, всё дело в том, посылает ли человек своим чихом какой-то сигнал или нет. Если это смачное, громкое, чёткое, полногласное раскатистое ААААААААПЧХИБЛЯТЬ от всей души – не грех и пожелать здоровья, или иным способом выразить своё почтение. А если это скромное "пчхи" в кулачок, то тут вежливо будет не заметить.

💯32❤6😁6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arutyunov2025. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTCAnonymous Poll349 voters

Какой самый уёбский опрос вы проходили в недавнее время?

  1. Про 43 года30%
  2. С какой вероятностью вы порекомендуете наш сервис по шкале от 0 до 1054%
  3. Иное17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Женя Арутюнов” (@arutyunov2025), 1,815 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arutyunov2025.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.