Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Таухид аудио

Channel

Таухид аудио

@tawhid_audio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

167subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001599471423
TypeChannel
Username@tawhid_audio
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tawhid_audio

Growth

164167165.58 August 2026 — 165 subscribers8 August 2026 — 165 subscribers9 August 2026 — 164 subscribers25 August 2026 — 167 subscribers8 August 202625 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 164–167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 08:28167+3
9 Aug 2026, 01:40164-1
8 Aug 2026, 16:15165no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:15165first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.60%
avg views ÷ 167 subscribers
Avg views / post
4.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total87
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @knigi_tawhidFile

Приближаться к Аллаху посредством просьбы заступничества пророка, когда он был жив, является благим делом по иджмаа всех мусульман Фатва Ибн Таймии из Фатава Кубра И когда он был жив, через его дуа Аллаху, и через его шафаат (мольба за другого) и другие подобные действия, которые входят в число его действийи действий других рабов Аллаха, эти благие действия в истинности приказаны, и это известно и дозволено по един

8 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @prosit_jivogo_o_dua_k_Allahu

Приближаться к Аллаху посредством просьбы заступничества пророка, когда он был жив, является благим делом по иджмаа всех мусульман. После смерти это является куфром акбар по иджмаа всех мусульман وَشَفَاعَتِهِ وَنَحْوِ ذَلِكَ، مِمَّا هُوَ مِنْ أَفْعَالِهِ، وَأَفْعَالِ الْعِبَادِ الْمَأْمُورِ بِهَا فِي حَقِّهِ، فَهُوَ مَشْرُوعٌ بِاتِّفَاقِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ، وَكَانَ الصَّحَابَةُ - رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ - يَتَوَسَّلُو

8 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tawhid_otveti

Суд тагута https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/438?single https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/439?single https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/440 https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/441 https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/442 https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/443 https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/444 https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/445 https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/446 https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/447 https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/448 https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/447 https://t.me/knigi_taw

8 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tawhid_otveti

У Муслима есть право Хусн занн, и его распутник не может отметить, тем более без далила Я отвечаю на вопросы и выкладываю их только со своими словами на своих каналах это известковый факт Ты же с вопросами пришёл, а у меня обучение моих учеников и подписчиков тем вопросам что актуальны и задают часто Хвала Аллаху мне истина ясна, ты пришел ее узнавать не приписывай мне что она не ясна мне Я буду делать так как сч

7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @knigi_tawhid

Как может вернуться куфр брату в такфире,если он куфр не совершал, за что тогда обвиняемый по мнению мурджиитов становится неверным? Ответ: В хадис есть, но мурджииты не точно приводят его намеренно, потому что яхуды этой киблы, то есть изменяют писание. Сам хадис есть с такой фразой, где нет фразы которую они добавляют, сам станет неверным Но не как мурджииты говорят станет неверным Грех вернётся Грех вернётся

7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @knigi_tawhid

Толкование хадиса: тот, кто говорит своему брату кафир Спросили шейха Абу Батина относительно этого хадиса «тот, говорит мусульманину кафир он сам становится кафиром» Он ответил: "Эта версия Хадиса нам не известна как переданная от пророка (да благословит его Аллах и приветствует), но есть известный хадис: «тот, кто говорит своему брату кафир тогда это, возвращается одному из двух». Тот, кто обвиняет человека в не

7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC3 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @knigi_tawhidFile

Понимание хадиса: "Когда один муслим говорит своему брату "неверный" https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/431

7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @knigi_tawhid

Разве хадисе сказано то, что говорят мурджииты или это их ложь в связи с их болезнью? Ссылка на пояснения от ранних учёных как правильно понимать хадис в переписке Нет такого хадиса ложь мурджиитов, хадис по другому звучит и смысл другой что грех вернётся Не правильно вам приводят его А ты не поймёшь что там о другом вообще, как человек не делая куфр кафиром станет? Ответь пожалуйста, ведь в хадисе сказано брат св

7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @knigi_tawhid

Если ошибочно вынес такфир сказав кафир на муслима, некоторые говорят это слово вернётся обратно сказавашему? Так ли это? Ва алейкум ассалам Нет неправильно. Вернётся грех, а не такфир Вообще некоторые говорят не является далилом На канале этот вопрос уже обьяснялся Если найду скину ссылку Иди можете воспользоваться сами поиском на канале https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/431 https://t.me/tawhid_otveti/331 https://t

5 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tawhid_otveti

Наговоры на учёных мусульман Ахлюссунна. Наговоры на Абу Ханифу https://t.me/tawhid_otveti/1713 https://t.me/tawhid_otveti/2026 https://t.me/tawhid_otveti/2027 https://t.me/tawhid_otveti/2028 https://t.me/tawhid_otveti/2029 https://t.me/tawhid_otveti/2030 https://t.me/tawhid_otveti/2031 https://t.me/maktabat_tawhid/1139/1467 https://t.me/maktabat_tawhid/1139/1480 https://t.me/tawhid_otveti/870 https://t.me

5 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC3 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @knigi_tawhidFile

Табиины и табитабиины об Абу Ханифе Источник: Добродетель имама Абу Ханифы и его двух учеников, автор выдающийся знаменитый Аз-Захаби 673 - 748 года по хиджаре الذَّهَبي ٦٧٣ - ٧٤٨ هـ ص29-30 - كتاب مناقب الإمام أبي حنيفة وصاحبيه https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/227

5 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tawhid_otveti

Мурджииты и хаваридж в сети интернет говорят что Абу Ханифа говорил что вера не увеличивается и не уменьшается. Правда ли это за Абу Ханифу? Ответ; Где далил? Говорят это не далил в шариате Воплощающий; Ещё приводят посланник Аллаха (мир ему и благословение Аллаха) сказал: «Две категории людей из моей общины не будут подпущены к моему водоему и не войдут в Рай! А это къадариты и мурджииты!» ат-Табарани в «аль-Аусат

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tawhid_audio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Хотите уроки по Именам Аллаха Всевышнего?

  1. Да, знание всегда приветствуется27%
  2. Да. Создайте пожалуйста отдельный канал по этой тематике, где проще и быстро будет найти информацию80%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 261,746 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Таухид аудио” (@tawhid_audio), 167 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tawhid_audio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.