Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Арабский язык полезное

Channel

Арабский язык полезное

@lugatularabia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

114subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001782629568
TypeChannel
Username@lugatularabia
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lugatularabia

Growth

114115114.510 August 2026 — 114 subscribers10 August 2026 — 114 subscribers17 August 2026 — 115 subscribers24 August 2026 — 114 subscribers10 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 07:34114-1
17 Aug 2026, 13:15115+1
10 Aug 2026, 11:00114no change
10 Aug 2026, 10:46114first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.96%
avg views ÷ 114 subscribers
Avg views / post
3.4
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total27
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 47s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC1 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @knigi_tawhidFile

Жёны это хрустальные сосуды. Фатх Аль Барри Шарх Сахих Аль Бухари https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/455

9 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC1 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @niikaah

Жёны это хрустальные сосуды. Шарх Сахих Аль Бухари Глава: Использование (аллегории) предполагаемого смысл слов со значением в котором нет обмана. باب: المعاريض مندوحة عن الكذب ٥٨٥٦ - حَدَّثَنَا آدَمُ: حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنْ ثَابِتٍ الْبُنَانِيِّ، عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ قَالَ: كَانَ النَّبِيُّ ﷺ فِي مَسِيرٍ لَهُ، فَحَدَا الْحَادِي، فَقَالَ النَّبِيُّ ﷺ: (ارْفُقْ يَا أَنْجَشَةُ، وَيْحَكَ، بِالْقَوَارِيرِ). 58

9 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC3 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @niikaahPoll

Хотите хадис и пояснение к нему, из которого видно как посланник Аллаха да благословит его Аллах и приветствует, относился к своим жёнам?

  1. Мы уже слышали об этом0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC2 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @tawhid_otveti

Просили привести пример где в вопросах Уаля учёные применяли аят, что кафиры являются уалими друг другу وقال ابن القيم: الكافر يكون وليا لوليته الكافرة دون المسلمة، قال تعالى: {وَالْمُؤْمِنُونَ وَالْمُؤْمِنَاتُ بَعْضُهُمْ أَوْلِيَاءُ بَعْضٍ} [التوبة: 71]، وقال: {وَالَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا بَعْضُهُمْ أَوْلِيَاءُ بَعْضٍ} [الأنفال: 73]… (أحكام أهل الذمة (2/ 782) Ибн аль-Каййим сказал: Неверующий может быть уалием только для

9 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC3 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @niikaahVideo

Жилище лучшего из людей, пророка Мухаммада, да благословит его Аллах и приветствует О те, кто ищет большой махр, и те кто ищет мирское погружаясь в него, посмотрите как жил лучший из людей, его простота и его супруги, которые предпочли будущую жизнь перед нинешней https://t.me/niikaah/1270

3 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC5 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @tawhidasmaAllah

Тафсир Ат Табари, предания которые пришли на имя Аллах ابن جَرير الطَّبَري ٢٢٤ - ٣١٠ هـ القول في تأويل قوله جل ثناؤه: {اللَّهِ} . قال أبو جعفر: وأما تأويل قول الله تعالى ذكره "الله"، فإنه على معنى ما رُوي لنا عن عبد الله بن عباس-: هو الذي يَألَهه كل شيء، ويعبده كل خلْقٍ. وذلك أنّ أبا كريب حدثنا، قال: حدثنا عثمان بن سعيد، قال: حدثنا بشر بن عُمَارة، قال: حدثنا أبو رَوْق، عن الضحاك، عن عبد الله بن عباس، قال: "الله"

3 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC4 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @tawhidasmaAllah

Тафсир Ат Табари. О слове Всевышнего Аллаха: У Аллаха самые прекрасные имена, взывайте к Нему, посредством них. Сура Преграды, аят 180 أمر بإخلاص العبادة لله ، ومجانبة المشركين والملحدين В этом аяте есть приказ к искреннему поклонению Аллаху и избеганию многобожников и атеистов... Мукатиль и другие комментаторы сказали: Этот аят был ниспослан о верующем, который в своей молитве говорил: «О ар Рахман, о ар Рахим».

29 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC8 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @tawhid_otvetiPhoto

Слово тагут происходит же от арабского слова طُغْيَان ? Ответ: Да Что означает переходить границы дозволенного https://t.me/tawhid_otveti/2250

28 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC9 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @knigi_tawhidFile

Кто перечислит имена Аллаха воидет в рай. Толкование этих слов в хадисе Посланник Аллаха да благословит его Аллах и приветствует, сказал: "У Аллаха девяносто девять имен, сто без одного, кто их перечислит войдёт в рай". Сахих Аль Бухари Шарх хадиса Ибн Малак Аль-Кирмани ум. 854 году по хиджаре О выражении: Кто их перечислит ... https://t.me/knigi_tawhid/410

28 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC8 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @al_uala_i_al_bara

Смысл выражения в хадисе, кто перечислит имена Аллаха воидет в рай Посланник Аллаха да благословит его Аллах и приветствует, сказал: "У Аллаха девяносто девять имен, сто без одного, кто их перечислит войдёт в рай". Сахих Аль Бухари Шарх хадиса Ибн Малак Аль-Кирмани ум. 854 году по хиджаре О выражении: Кто их перечислит ... Относительно этого было сказано: Смысл этого высказывания — «кто будет действовать в соотв

28 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC7 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @al_uala_i_al_bara

Бисмиллях Часто вижу как совсем не знающие вообще из таухида ничего люди, причисляющие себя к Исламу, преподносят неправильный смысл хадиса, что кто просто прочитает перечислив 99 имен Аллаха уже будет в раю. Хотите Шарх хадиса от раннего ученого чтобы они задумались хоть чуть-чуть что нужно не только перечислить прочитав, а жить в соответствии с ними соблюдая повседневно, и ежедневно, и ежесекундно Таухид Аллаха Вс

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lugatularabia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Хотите хадис и пояснение к нему, из которого видно как посланник Аллаха да благословит его Аллах и приветствует, относился к своим жёнам?

  1. Мы уже слышали об этом0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 368,939 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Арабский язык полезное” (@lugatularabia), 114 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lugatularabia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.