Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,692–6,783 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 14:54
6,704
-7
7 Nov 2026, 00:44
6,711
-9
4 Nov 2026, 07:40
6,720
+3
1 Nov 2026, 14:51
6,717
-11
29 Oct 2026, 15:09
6,728
-6
26 Oct 2026, 08:04
6,734
-6
23 Oct 2026, 00:11
6,740
-4
19 Oct 2026, 15:06
6,744
-6
16 Oct 2026, 08:21
6,750
-1
13 Oct 2026, 14:55
6,751
+10
7 Oct 2026, 08:36
6,741
+33
30 Sept 2026, 07:22
6,708
-23
16 Sept 2026, 06:38
6,731
-41
12 Sept 2026, 18:42
6,772
+69
9 Sept 2026, 04:39
6,703
+1
4 Sept 2026, 01:18
6,702
-9
31 Aug 2026, 19:45
6,711
-2
28 Aug 2026, 13:43
6,713
-1
25 Aug 2026, 19:02
6,714
-1
22 Aug 2026, 23:17
6,715
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.5%
avg views ÷ 6,704 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,710
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
43 (3 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
25,646
Reactions total
725
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 15:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 49s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,924 reactions across 43 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
235
12.2%
custom 5272001630613567106
226
11.7%
🔥
208
10.8%
custom 5301229454293506614
184
9.56%
custom 5301032594467494993
157
8.16%
custom 5298685768502385758
136
7.07%
custom 5271934504569695583
98
5.09%
🥰
81
4.21%
❤🔥
68
3.53%
🤣
55
2.86%
custom 5197585682918286193
47
2.44%
custom 5299021853988262754
35
1.82%
👻
35
1.82%
custom 5300938573338418894
34
1.77%
custom 5301224197253537309
30
1.56%
🎉
30
1.56%
custom 5309978251135823456
24
1.25%
custom 5413563125624513517
24
1.25%
💅
23
1.20%
custom 5278757743019204381
21
1.09%
16 further kinds
173
8.99%
Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,924 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Когда вышел из отпуска и пытаешься догнать контекст проекта по встречам за это время 🤓
Рассказываем на Хабре про наш осенний релиз — Темы в Контур.Толке. Они собирают цельную историю созвонов и обсуждений по проекту в одном месте.
Такую фичу мы сделали первыми в России!
#konturtech_habr
А теперь поп-культурный дайджест: что ещё вышло в 1988 году? Вот они — ровесники Контура, вдруг что приглянется на выходные.
Музыка: Guns and Roses — Sweet Child of Mine и Кино — Группа крови.
Фильмы: «Крепкий орешек», «Кто подставил кролика Роджера?» и «Собачье сердце».
Аниме: «Мой сосед Тоторо» и «Акира».
Игра: «Super Mario Bros. 3». А ещё вышла Sega Mega Drive. Легенды!
А ещё мем! Ну точнее мемом он стал уже …
А у нас день рождения — 38 лет!🎂
Решили отметить в путешествии во времени. Вместе слетаем и посмотрим, как всё начиналось.
Попробуем удержать 1988 год, чтобы машина времени верно сработала (и нас не унесло в пещерный век!)
Вам послание: сможете расшифровать? Это мы так написали слово Контур!
Ставьте нам сердечко в рейтинге работодателей hh.ru 😊
А с нас в следующем году больше выступлений, стендов, роликов, историй и приколов в канале ⌨
Есть два Техноквиза 🤔
Казань 🤝 Новосибирск
Оба 11 ноября. На каждом смешные и интересные вопросы из мира айти. Везде можно участвовать не только разработчикам.
Выбор за вами 😎
#konturtech_event
Устраиваем митап для тестировщиков в Новосибирске!
Ваш опыт — главный инструмент этой встречи. Будем спорить, разбирать факапы и искать ответы друг у друга за круглыми столами. Приходите с вопросами, уходите с новыми связями (ещё и нейронными!) 🧠
Записи не будет, но мы возможно поделимся мыслями со встречи в канале.
👀 Ждём вас с 18:30, старт в 19:00
🟧 Адрес: ул. Советская, 36. Офис разработки Контура, конференц-за…
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @KonturTech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Контур @skbkontur_official · 25,129 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Контур для предпринимателя @konturelba · 26,031 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 September 2026
Ozon Tech @ozon_tech · 30,158 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Код Желтый @kod_zheltyi · 33,560 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
T-Crew @t_crew · 43,532 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Авиасейлс Екатеринбург @aviasales_ekaterinburg · 20,268 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
Контур для бухгалтера @externjournal · 42,893 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Технологии в Контуре” (@KonturTech), 6,704 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KonturTech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.