Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sustainability job portal

Channel

Sustainability job portal

@sustanabilityjobportal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,109subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001301761364
TypeChannel
Username@sustanabilityjobportal
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sustanabilityjobportal

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0881,1091,098.57 August 2026 — 1,088 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,088 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,089 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,094 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,096 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,097 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,098 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,099 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,100 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,101 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,107 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,106 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,109 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,085–1,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 11:211,109+3
12 Sept 2026, 06:381,106-1
8 Sept 2026, 07:191,107+6
2 Sept 2026, 19:451,101+1
30 Aug 2026, 16:431,100+1
27 Aug 2026, 17:281,099+1
24 Aug 2026, 11:331,098+1
21 Aug 2026, 03:151,097+1
17 Aug 2026, 17:191,096+2
14 Aug 2026, 20:361,094+5
11 Aug 2026, 12:481,089+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:061,088no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:431,088first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2362.2%
💯616.2%
💊38.11%
🤷25.41%
👏12.70%
🤝12.70%
🤮12.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sustanabilityjobportal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC97 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

А вы сталкивались с манипуляциями при увольнении?

  1. Мне выдвигали манипулятивные условия (я работодатель), разошлись плохо14%
  2. Мне выдвигали манипулятивные условия (я работодатель), удалось договориться0%
  3. Мне выдвигали манипулятивные условия (я сотрудник), разошлись плохо29%
  4. Мне выдвигали манипулятивные условия (я сотрудник), удалось договориться57%
  5. Я выдвигал требования при увольнении (я сотрудник), разошлись плохо0%
  6. Я выдвигал требования при увольнении (я сотрудник), удалось договориться0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC100 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Каждый третий россиянин угрожал увольнением, чтобы выбить прибавку к зарплате. В 60% случаев это срабатывало, показал опрос Superjob, а 6% сотрудников сразу были уволены. Blueprint собрал инструкцию, как правильно объявлять об увольнении. Бонус: кейсы, к чему приводят манипуляции (с обоих сторон). При этом в 2025 году каждая четвертая российская компания сокращала персонал по причине замедления экономики

🤝1

4 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC148 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ВАКАНСИИ В КРЕАТИВЕ SMM-менеджер в фонд "Второе дыхание" Графический дизайнер в фонд "Второе дыхание" SMM-менеджер в фонд "Дорога Жизни"

1

16 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC331 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tineodnaruPhoto

Open-call юристов для ТыНеОдна Волонтеры-юристы помогают проекту консультировать пострадавших по юридическим вопросам (например, какие есть механизмы защиты, куда обращаться за помощью и как правильно фиксировать доказательства). Если у вас есть соответствующее высшее образование и желание помогать ТыНеОдна, пожалуйста, свяжитесь с нашими координаторами в телеграм: @koordinatorkatno. Если остались вопросы по поводу

6 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC389 viewsread 8 August 2026

Старший маркетолог в направлении «Инклюзия» в Яндекс

1 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC491 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Координатор социальных проектов в PARI

2

23 Jun 2026, 09:10 UTC501 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Работа на заводе полезнее для ментального здоровья, чем офис, уверяют психологи. Дело в чётком графике, отсутствии переработок и необходимости быть постоянно онлайн. Кроме того, понятные процессы и чёткое распределение ответственности снижают фоновую тревожность и убирают триггеры выгорания. В то время как в офисах за красивыми бонусами вроде спа или фитнеса часто скрываются размытые границы рабочего дня. На заводе

5🤷2

19 Jun 2026, 17:58 UTC467 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @okoloretail

Ozon обучит сотрудников ПВЗ работе с клиентами с особыми потребностями Курс, разработанный Ozon Заботой, поможет создавать более комфортный клиентский опыт для людей с разными особенностями здоровья и жизненными обстоятельствами. Программа упростит коммуникацию с пожилыми людьми, клиентами с ментальными особенностями, нарушениями слуха, зрения, а также с ограничениями двигательных функций. Модули разработаны совмест

4💊3

19 Jun 2026, 12:52 UTC370 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ГИС-специалист-инженер в Центр цифровых технологий для природно-климатических проектов НИУ ВШЭ Требования: ⚫️понимание архитектуру веб-ГИС платформ на базе EverGIS или аналогичных решений; ⚫️умение работать с пространственными данными; ⚫️желание развиваться на стыке ГИС, IT и климатической повестки. Задачи: ⚫️работать с пространственными данными: Python, geopandas, shapely и другие инструменты; ⚫️разбираться с коо

🤮1

10 Jun 2026, 12:22 UTC349 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👍🏼 Мини-дайджест вебинаров и других полезных событий для тех, кто ищет работу или просто развития ▫️ Вебинар Кто говорит от имени компании в эру ИИ? 11 июня в 19:00 мск ▫️Вебинар «Налоговые послабления для малого бизнеса в 2026 году» 11 июня в 10:00 мск ▫️Открытая онлайн-встреча Клуба руководителей: «Управленческий поединок: практика сложных переговоров» 20 июня в 11:00 (мск) ▫️Вебинар «Эмоциональная цена лидер

1

10 Jun 2026, 11:38 UTC321 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @theblueprintnewsPhoto

Почти половина женщин в возрасте 25-44 лет хочет уйти из арт-индустрии в ближайшие пять лет. Такие результаты показало новое исследование, проведенное изданием Artnet совместно с организацией Association of Women in the Arts. По данным опроса более 2 тысяч участниц, чаще всего об уходе из сферы искусства задумываются женщины 35-44 лет – представительницы именно этой возрастной группы могли бы в скором времени занять

10 Jun 2026, 09:10 UTC274 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @grade_practicum

ИИ стал причиной глобально сокращения руководителей младшего и среднего звена в 2026 году. Компании во всём мире сокращают средний управленческий слой из-за внедрения искусственного интеллекта. ИИ берёт на себя часть отчётности, контроля и координации. Это значит, некоторые роли middle management становятся менее нужными. Внедрение ИИ стало ключевым фактором сокращений в технологической отрасли, показал новый отчет

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sustanabilityjobportal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

А вы сталкивались с манипуляциями при увольнении?

  1. Мне выдвигали манипулятивные условия (я работодатель), разошлись плохо14%
  2. Мне выдвигали манипулятивные условия (я работодатель), удалось договориться0%
  3. Мне выдвигали манипулятивные условия (я сотрудник), разошлись плохо29%
  4. Мне выдвигали манипулятивные условия (я сотрудник), удалось договориться57%
  5. Я выдвигал требования при увольнении (я сотрудник), разошлись плохо0%
  6. Я выдвигал требования при увольнении (я сотрудник), удалось договориться0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Возможности в устойчивом развитии
@check_opportunities · 22,940
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Russian Speaking Jobs
@rusukrjobs · 25,577
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
Ресайкл
@recyclemagru · 58,060
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Экология без фанатизма
@ecodays · 38,627
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Экологиня
@ecomisli · 45,448
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sustainability job portal” (@sustanabilityjobportal), 1,109 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sustanabilityjobportal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.