Channel
@stuffybadger
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,918subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001281541749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stuffybadger |
| Created | 22 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stuffybadger |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 2,918 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 2,921 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 2,922 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 2,922 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 May 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29,140 |
| Reactions total | 513 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,338 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 371 | 27.7% | |
| custom 5920515596088250243 | 319 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5221982978355243461 | 217 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5364212770277443913 | 184 | 13.8% | |
| 😁 | 181 | 13.5% | |
| 🫡 | 19 | 1.42% | |
| 🎉 | 12 | 0.897% | |
| 🤬 | 10 | 0.747% | |
| custom 5391333525951647964 | 7 | 0.523% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 0.448% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.374% | |
| custom 4997289389148079171 | 4 | 0.299% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.149% | |
| custom 5469694074690747819 | 1 | 0.075% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,338reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
DailyIranNews: Иран требует 7%-ного транзитного сбора для всех коммерческих судов, проходящих через Ормузский пролив, в то время как США стремятся снизить ставку до 5%. Российские и китайские суда будут освобождены от этого сбора. Время торговать регистрацией судов аки Монголия - с откатом иранским партнёрам, разумеется
👍28custom 522198297835524346113custom 53642127702774439133custom 59205155960882502431
Тем временем наши трансатлантические партнёры за каких-то 5 месяцев прошли путь от "МЫ УНИЧТОЖИМ ИРАНСКУЮ ЦИВИЛИЗАЦИЮ" до "ну хз если честно что мы ещё можем сделать давайте покидайте идей ещё что ли"
custom 592051559608825024347😁13custom 53642127702774439138custom 52219829783552434616
Судя по повторному ляпсусу ниже, сам товарищ Данилов обсуждаемого автора не читал - но знает! а стоп отмена это про другого Читатель, помни! Богатый Господь для богатых господ - богатая литература, иначе ты не чад сигма профессор Преображенский, а Шариков. Кстати, те, кто читал исходник Булгакова, а не только смотрел фильм 80х, могут помнить, что там на самом деле вообще всё не так однозначно, но это Бог с ним, кто …
custom 592051559608825024327👍14custom 52219829783552434618
"Сэр, доходность 10-леток опять пробила 4,7%, мы не можем атаковать на этих выходных"
custom 522198297835524346132custom 592051559608825024312custom 53642127702774439133
Если американцам было интересно, как со стороны выглядело их т.н. посредничество в нынешнем конфликте на Украине, то примерно вот так.
custom 592051559608825024366👍21custom 536421277027744391314custom 52219829783552434617
На второй год обсуждения законопроекта Зоркий глаз заметил настоящую цель предлагаемой новеллы
😁24custom 522198297835524346111custom 53642127702774439134
Ровно 5 лет назад появился псевдоэкспертный квазианонимный телеграм-канал 🦡"Душный барсук"🦡. Изначально это было идеей жены, чтобы я не ей мозги делал новостями, а вам кому-то ещё. Заодно канал был площадкой, где я мог спорить с незнакомцами в телеграме - тогда ещё у большинства каналов не было секции комментариев. В последнее время, как вы могли заметить, я пишу сюда гораздо реже - просто обсуждать новости стало ме…
👍51custom 522198297835524346116custom 536421277027744391312🫡6🎉3😢3🤔2
Первым своим указом новый премьер-министр правительства его величества Энди Бёрнам, судя по всему, решил отправить в отставку Сырского. Новая метла по-новому метёт. Для душнил постоянных подписчиков, это юмористический пост, написанный на основе непроверенных данных
custom 592051559608825024341🎉8🫡7custom 49972893891480791712
Video, posted without a caption
custom 536421277027744391358custom 522198297835524346116👍7custom 59205155960882502434custom 49972893891480791711custom 54696940746907478191
Только выиграли
custom 592051559608825024346custom 52219829783552434618😁5custom 53642127702774439134
Есть конечно способ вернуть ситуацию в нормальное переговорное русло. После очередного удара по объектам в Крыму (а он будет, куда деваться), берется и и сбивается над Черным морем британский RC-135W 51-й эскадрильи из Уоддингтона. Не с видом «ой мы тут случайно, ракета на учениях на ворону навелась, а потом каааак улетела!», а с прямым заявлением, что самолет целенаправленно сбит с намерением оскорбить в виду учас…
👍64custom 536421277027744391321custom 59205155960882502438
Video, posted without a caption
custom 536421277027744391320🫡5😁5🎉1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @stuffybadger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 473,490 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Душный Барсук” (@stuffybadger), 2,918 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stuffybadger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.