Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Pensive Georges

@pensive_georges

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

387subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003440125362
TypeChannel
Username@pensive_georges
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pensive_georges

Growth

387388387.56 August 2026 — 388 subscribers6 August 2026 — 388 subscribers13 August 2026 — 387 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 387–388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:38387-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:05388no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:25388first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 16 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
100.7%
avg views ÷ 387 subscribers
Avg views / post
390
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held17 (16 May 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,948
Reactions total172
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

444 reactions across 17 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁13029.3%
10223.0%
👍4610.4%
🤣4510.1%
🔥409.01%
💯143.15%
92.03%
👏92.03%
😍81.80%
❤‍🔥71.58%
👎61.35%
🤝61.35%
😱40.901%
😢30.676%
🤓20.45%
🤗20.45%
🍾10.225%
🎄10.225%
💅10.225%
💋10.225%
7 further kinds71.58%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 444reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC186 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Машинный, искусственный текст легко распознать по неуместной апофатике и противопоставлениям, как-то особенно пакостно имитирующим пульс мысли, авторскую замысловатость и даже некоторую задушевность. Отовсюду свисают буквально гектары примерно таких простыней: Над ней смеялись - хрупкая женщина в мире всезнающих мужчин. Она не отступила. Не сдалась. Не бросила своё дело. Она продолжила бороться. Это пример не боли,

😁16💯83🔥3🤣2😱1

28 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC261 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Периодически обижаю людей удивлением по поводу того, что поклонники "Короля и Шута" не то что до сих пор существуют, а даже воспроизводятся и водят детей на поклон своим кумирам. Музыка как музыка - ну, ритм, аккорды. Но к Шуту слишком прочно прилипли мифологемы, кажущиеся бедными, душными и игрушечными: какие-то ведьмы, мельники, путники, пиксельное Средневековье из бродилки Плейстейшн 1997 года. Вдобавок он - не з

😁93👍3💯3🤣32🤓2🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC373 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ежели бы я был не я, а красивейший, умнейший и лучший человек в мире Pensive Georges, обязательно назвал бы канал "Четырёхпудовый одышливый Гогия". Странно, что до сих пор никто не воспользовался этим ярким астафьевским лейблом, примерив его на себя в русле здравой самокритики и модного презрения к патетическому. Тут, однако, была бы художественная неправда: pensive-то я pensive, а вот пудов во мне, пожалуй, все пя

😁86👍3🤩1

19 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC611 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Впопыхах полез в вагон с кондиционером, хотя по билету полагался только с рабочими и крестьянами. За это контролёр захотел отобрать шестьсот рупий и в пылу полемики уже достал было тетрадь для записи обид, но вдруг задумался и спросил: - Вы индиец? - Нет, - развёл руками я, готовясь заважничать (Агутин-Распутин! Гагарин-татарин! Мой дядя самых честных правил! Я взял Париж, я основал Лицей!). Слабая тень милосердия об

😁157👍6🔥3😢31💯1

17 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC517 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Платно-бесплатные ястребы так клюют платно-бесплатных голубей, словно те какие-то очень влиятельные и опасные субъекты. Кузьмичёв, Хананыгин и Дуремарова столь упорно упражняются в инвективах по адресу Саши Пруфа, Яши Скуфа, Маши Шмокмор и Аси Кабсдох, что создаётся впечатление, будто у последних - гектары земли, ящики алмазов, тридцать третий градус, возможности законотворчества, записная книжка в 24 гигабайта, толп

😁11🤣73🤝2👏1

12 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC519 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Одна из наиболее раздражающих примет низкопоклонства перед неизвестно чем - измерять добродетели социумов Нобелевской премией и вообще носиться с ней як с писаной торбой. Банания? 35 миллионов населения, паштет из колибри, диктатор Франсиско Табаско и 4 лауреата. Дуркадурка Халуми - лицо года, получила Нобеля за вклад в страдания и за невежество. Компотцы - талантливый народ, у них семь лауреатов, а пиджакцы - варва

11🤣8😁5🤗2💋1🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC557 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

"Если все печальные на свете искренне и с полною верою помолятся Господу Иисусу Христу, все ваши печали отдалятся". В сумерках, под пронизывающим ливнем и ветром, на стене в переулке в районе Кроуфордского рынка. Должен сказать, впечатляет, особенно когда тебя застали в заботах, невзгодах и маете. (Именно в качестве религиозного знамения в целом, безотносительно конкретной операционной системы). Выше уровня глаз (п

18❤‍🔥6😁5🎄1🕊1

4 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC464 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Старинное изобразительное искусство толком никому не понятно, кроме тех, кому полагается. О чём "Гроза" Джорджоне? Что значит ковёр и фигурки сбоку в "Благовещении" Антонио Пластилино? Почему у святого Кортизолия пальцы так, а не этак? А современное искусство обозначило: 1) всё понятно; 2) ничего понимать не надо; 3) понимай как знаешь - причём одновременно.

🔥126😁5💯1🫡1

29 Jun 2026, 11:37 UTC575 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Никаких князей Ахматовых не существовало. Анна Горенко просто интересничала по моде 1910-х: у кого живая змея вместо ожерелья, кто татарский хан, кто пьяный рубил саблей пальмы в ресторане "Эльдорадо", кто в третьем классе гимназии уже лечил триппер и тому подобное прошлое регистратора ЗАГСа. Также не вполне справедливо русскую аристократию ордынского происхождения ассоциируют с Юсуповым-младшим - вероятно, из-за мо

9😁7👍4👏1

22 Jun 2026, 07:15 UTC592 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026

C удивлением заметил, что читательские отзывы на книги сейчас примерно такие: "Книгу доставили быстро, в очень прочном конверте с плотной картонной вставкой внутри, удачный подбор шрифтов, оптимальный цвет бумаги, понравились метафоры автора, очень вежливый курьер". Нет, я всё понимаю, отзыв идёт сразу ы на товар, ы на услугу - диалектика. Но, знаете, как-то --- В общем, как неосторожно призналась одна поэтесса, "б

😁19🤣8🤝4👏2💯1🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @pensive_georges. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 935,376 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pensive Georges” (@pensive_georges), 387 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pensive_georges.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.