👁️👁️ Kami memantau apa yang anda lakukan di internet. • Merancang kandungan hasutan • Menulis kandungan hasutan • Menyiarkan kandungan hasutan di internet Selepas melakukan jenayah keganasan dalam erti kata sebenar, anda boleh dikenakan tindakan penangkapan, malah dipenjarakan, seperti yang pernah berlaku dalam kes-kes seumpama ini. Kami telah memberi amaran kepada anda. Tentera negara haram menyerbu bandar Surra…

Channel
Tahreer Gh 🇵🇸
@tahreergh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,157subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001726594252 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tahreergh |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tahreergh |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 4,157 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 4,164 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 4,176 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 4,176 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.11%
- avg views ÷ 4,157 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 212
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.13%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (2 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,821 |
| Reactions total | 116 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 45s
- Average length
- 48s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
116 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 66 | 56.9% | |
| 🤬 | 31 | 26.7% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 15.5% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Apabila wajah tidak lagi dapat dikenali di bawah runtuhan, dan kesan cap jari hilang akibat masa serta pengeboman, tubuh mangsa yang tidak berdosa seakan-akan berbicara dengan caranya sendiri. Di Gaza, selepas seorang syahid tidak dapat dikenal pasti kerana keadaan jasadnya yang telah mengalami pereputan teruk, pasukan penyelamat dan Pertahanan Awam hari ini berjaya mengenal pasti identitinya melalui set gigi palsu.…
😢6
Kerna kami adalah tuan rumah yang benar 🇵🇸✌️ “Jangan takut… jangan sekali-kali berani untuk takut kepada mereka. Kamu hanya perlu takut kepada Allah.” Itulah kata-kata seorang ayah Palestin kepada anaknya ketika tentera Israel dikerahkan secara besar-besaran di Kafr Aqab, utara Baitulmaqdis. Di tengah ketakutan dan kehadiran tentera yang begitu ramai, seorang ayah cuba menguatkan hati anaknya. Seorang ayah mengaj…
❤3
Gambar ini diambil pada saat-saat terakhir kehidupan mereka 💔 Inilah foto terakhir yang diketahui bagi dua warga emas Gaza, Nadi Ma'ruf dan Ali Ma'ruf. Foto ini diambil hanya beberapa jam sebelum mereka dilaporkan dibunuh oleh tentera Israel di Beit Lahia, utara Gaza, pada November 2024. Mereka dipaksa berjalan di hadapan tentera sebagai perisai manusia, sebelum akhirnya mereka turut dibunuh. Sebuah gambar yang ha…
🤬4
Satu pemuda Palestin VS sekumpulan anjing liar di Tebing Barat Palestin TahreerGh Gh
🤬7
Krisis baharu di dalam penjara Israel!! Kini, pakaian dan al-Quran pula menjadi sasaran. Menurut Pejabat Media Tahanan Palestin, Menteri Keselamatan Israel, Itamar Ben-Gvir, dilaporkan memasuki Penjara Negev dan mengarahkan supaya baki pakaian milik tahanan dirampas. Akibatnya, kebanyakan tahanan kini hanya memiliki sehelai baju, sehelai seluar dan beberapa helai pakaian dalam. Penderitaan mereka tidak berakhir d…
🤬4
Tentang perarakan pengebumian terbesar dan terpanjang dalam sejarah Palestin beberapa hari lalu 💔 112 jenazah syuhada diiringi untuk dikebumikan... Dari sinilah sisa-sisa jasad mereka dikeluarkan. Namun tragedi keluarga Al-Hassayneh dan Abu Shariah bukanlah satu-satunya. Video ini merakamkan pembantaian di Blok Al-Taj, di Jalan Al-Yarmouk, Gaza City. Lihatlah kemusnahan yang ditinggalkan. Bayangkan kekuatan letu…
🤬1
Di Gaza, ada yang tidak pulang sebagai jasad yang sempurna. Bertahun-tahun di bawah runtuhan, yang tinggal hanyalah serpihan tulang yang menjadi saksi bahawa mereka pernah hidup, pernah mempunyai nama, keluarga dan impian 😥💔 Di barat bandar Gaza, pasukan penyelamat menemui sisa rangka seorang pemuda yang masih belum dikenal pasti identitinya. Yang tinggal hanyalah beberapa tulang... dan kad pengenalannya 💔 Tahreer…
😢7
Tiga tahun lalu, Salma yang ketika itu baru berusia 20 hari ditemui masih hidup di bawah runtuhan rumah keluarganya di Gaza. Dia merupakan satu-satunya yang terselamat daripada seluruh keluarganya. Salma diselamatkan oleh anggota Pertahanan Awam Palestin, Nooh Al-Shaghnoobi, yang mengeluarkannya dari celah-celah runtuhan selepas rumah mereka musnah akibat serangan udara Israel. Selepas hampir tiga tahun, Salma akh…
❤12
Jenazah terbesar dan terpanjang di dalam sejarah Palestin 💔😞
😢14
Gaza hari ini bersiap untuk mengebumikan 112 jasad syuhada daripada keluarga Abu Sharia dan Al-Hassaina, selepas 136 jam operasi mencari dan mengeluarkan jasad yang begitu sukar di bawah runtuhan. Para syuhada ini dilaporkan terkorban dalam pembunuhan beramai-ramai di kawasan Al-Sabra, selatan Gaza, pada 22 November 2023. Serangan tersebut mengorbankan 308 orang, termasuk 40 kanak-kanak, 30 wanita dan 7 orang kuran…
😢10
Peluru yang dilepaskan oleh tentera Israel menembusi tangan seorang pelajar bernama Khaled, ketika dia sedang duduk di dalam sekolahnya mengikuti pelajaran di barat bandar Gaza 💔 TahreerGh Gh
🤬3❤1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tahreergh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 840,459 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tahreer Gh 🇵🇸” (@tahreergh), 4,157 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tahreergh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.