Channel Telegram rasmi Bro Firdaus Wong Wai Hung bagi berkongsi tip dakwah, menjawab persoalan terhadap Islam, perkembangan dakwah dalam dan luar negara.
Created
Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -274. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92,303–92,659 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 11:44
92,344
-37
13 Aug 2026, 05:16
92,381
-25
12 Aug 2026, 05:35
92,406
-40
11 Aug 2026, 08:28
92,446
-36
10 Aug 2026, 09:38
92,482
-44
9 Aug 2026, 08:04
92,526
-45
8 Aug 2026, 06:37
92,571
-46
7 Aug 2026, 05:05
92,617
-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:30
92,618
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:19
92,618
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.14%
avg views ÷ 92,344 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,980
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
31 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
61,275
Reactions total
1,913
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,410
Videos
≈299
Links
≈1,860
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,913 reactions across 31 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,226
64.1%
❤
291
15.2%
💯
182
9.51%
🤣
49
2.56%
😁
39
2.04%
🔥
38
1.99%
❤🔥
24
1.25%
😡
19
0.993%
🤬
12
0.627%
🤯
12
0.627%
👏
9
0.47%
🤔
2
0.105%
🤨
2
0.105%
🥴
2
0.105%
👎
1
0.052%
😢
1
0.052%
😨
1
0.052%
😱
1
0.052%
🤡
1
0.052%
🥰
1
0.052%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,913reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
“Abang ipar saya cakap kalian sangat baik. Kalian menjaga & melayan mak saya dengan begitu baik. Anak anak saya juga kata kalian jaga & layan nenek mereka dengan baik. Sekarang saya betul betul nampak. Terima kasih sangat-sangat kerana jaga & layan mak saya begitu baik sekali.”
Itu ungkapan anak perempuan Aunty Ang yang meninggal dunia semalam & telah selamat dikebumikan selepas solat Zohor tadi.
Alhamdulilah.
Ana…
“Dia tu bukan Cina. Dia dah anggap dia tu Melayu tulin, asalkan ada janggut kambing” - Richard Wan
Ada janggut tu dianggap Melayu?
Adakah Tua Pek Kong, Kwang Kong, Justice Bao, Ya Luo Wang (Dewa Neraka Cina) dan ramai lagi dewa dewi Cina ini ialah orang Melayu kerana mereka juga berjanggut?
Saya cuba memahami logik dia.
Komennya di perkongsian saya ini:- https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1cW78d46ha/?mibextid=wwXIf…
Ini antara sebab saya sering meminta kita semua jangan memberikan gelaran tidak baik terhadap sahabat Hindu kita kerana masih ramai lagi yang rasional seperti di dalam posting ini.
Lihat komen sahabat beragama Hindu kita:- https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1MSEjx6geA/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Kita tidak masuk campur cara mereka beragama.
Boleh lihat banyak komentar yang rasional dari sahabat Hindu kita.
“Tak mengapa jika nak curi, rompak atau sakau yang penting yang mengambil duit itu orang Melayu.
Tak mengapa ambillah, curilah lagi yang penting Melayu dan Islam sebab dalam negara kita ini, Melayu saja yang boleh rompak, curi, sakau dan mentekedarah duit rakyat, janji Islam Melayu tak ada masalah.” - Sany Hamzan
Dia cakap pasal bangsa Melayu. Saya Cina tak boleh komen sebab saya bukan Melayu.
Dia cakap pasal Isla…
Sidang Media #Justice4Shah
Jemputan ke Sidang Media #Justice4Shah pada Khamis, 13 Ogos 2026 bermula 11.30 pagi di @jomclaypot Bukit Jelutong.
Semua rakan media & sahabat aktivis dijemput hadir.
Maklumat lanjut, sila hubungi Hafiz di 01172680647
Ada yang berkata: "Bon Odori sekarang cuma tarian tradisional" atau "Tiada lagi unsur agama."
Benarkah begitu?
Untuk menjawabnya, kita perlu melihat sendiri asal usul, falsafah dan tujuan sebenar Bon Odori.
Saya setuju dengan kenyataan Timbalan Menteri Perpaduan bahawa dia sebagai Ahli Parlimen mempunyai tanggungjawab memahami, meneliti dan memastikan tadbir urus kewangan institusi yang melibatkan kepentingan rakyat dan negara pada landasan yang betul.
Saya paling setuju dengan baris terakhirnya;
“Isunya bukan soal agama tetapi soal akauntabiliti dan wang awam.”
Bak kata Upin Ipin, “Saya suka saya suka.”
Adakah deng…
“Aku ni baru nak kenal Islam. Bila masuk kelas agama, rasa terlalu advanced pula. Nak belajar tentang Islam, tapi tak tahu nak mula dari mana.”
Jika ini juga persoalan anda, anda berada di tempat yang tepat.
Dalam kelas ini, kami akan membimbing anda secara asas dan berperingkat untuk memahami:
1) Apa itu Islam (daripada asas yang paling fundamental)
2) Kenapa Islam (mengetahui tujuan secara rasional dan berhikmah…
“Kenapa Wesley Methodist Memaksa Pelajar Bukan Muslim Belajar Bible?”
Individu ini mengadu kenapa pelajar bukan Muslim dipaksa belajar Bible namun tidak mendapat sambutan hangat dari wargamaya.
Cuba terbalikkan situasi kepada;
“Kenapa Memaksa Pelajar Bukan Islam Belajar Quran?”
Saya percaya ramai wargamaya malahan media serta gabunggan kuffar akan keluarkan kenyataan mengkritik tindakan itu.
Saya tunggu MCCBCHST…
Ramai bertanya “Kenapa perlu wujudkan sekolah Cina dan Tamil di Malaysia?”
Ada juga yang berkata “Jika semua sekolah aliran dicampurkan, kita akan mewujudkan satu bangsa Malaysia yang bersatu.”
Tetapi persoalannya, adakah sekolah aliran itu sendiri isu sebenar?
Jom tonton perkongsian Bro Firdaus dari pengalaman hidupnya sendiri.
https://youtu.be/XC--E22sYVY
Jadilah Penyokong MRM hari ini.
MAYBANK
Pertubuhan Mual…
👍26❤2
Signed admin
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @brofirdauswong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 737,992 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@brofirdauswong named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@jomclaypot named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Nadir Al-Nuri @nadiralnuri · 217,270 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
Majlis Keselamatan Negara (Rasmi) @mknrasmi · 625,285 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
Nota Redza Zainol @NotaRedzaZainol · 133,934 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
CPRC Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia @cprckkm · 352,963 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
Terkini dan Sensasi Palestin @cintagaza · 120,158 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
Dunia Palestin 🇵🇸 @duniapalestin · 124,332 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Firdaus Wong Wai Hung Telegram” (@brofirdauswong), 92,344 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brofirdauswong.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
