❗️❗️soso搜索资源群 🥰 🥰🥰🥰 🥰🥰🥰 ✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/+HW1WlJwttZhjMjBl https://t.me/+HW1WlJwttZhjMjBl 🥰点击链接加入🥰
👍9❤1

Channel
@wuai99
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,729subscribers
+558 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002315831510 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wuai99 |
| Description | 吾爱永久公益内核 后续三角洲 无畏契约都会更新出来 bug反馈联系 @wsys6666 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wuai99 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 14,729 | +36 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 14,693 | +86 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 14,607 | +97 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 14,510 | +45 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 14,465 | +60 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 14,405 | +97 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:41 | 14,308 | +122 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 14,186 | +15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 14,171 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (1 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 180,041 |
| Reactions total | 456 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
456 reactions across 27 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 208 | 45.6% | |
| 👍 | 150 | 32.9% | |
| 👎 | 25 | 5.48% | |
| 💩 | 22 | 4.82% | |
| 🖕 | 15 | 3.29% | |
| 🤬 | 15 | 3.29% | |
| 🤮 | 8 | 1.75% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.877% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 0.877% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.658% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.439% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 456reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗️❗️soso搜索资源群 🥰 🥰🥰🥰 🥰🥰🥰 ✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/+HW1WlJwttZhjMjBl https://t.me/+HW1WlJwttZhjMjBl 🥰点击链接加入🥰
👍9❤1
爱玩系列全系公益内核启动器3.6 1.取消启动器频道验证 2.更新和平精英自瞄算法, 3.更新和平驱动,适用多款最新驱动 内置 1.lolm 2.无畏契约 3.失控进化 4.和平精英 集成多款爱玩系列辅助,只是一个启动器,本质还是内核,不影响稳定性 内置 1.lolm 2.无畏契约 3.失控进化 4.和平精英 全部都为内核,需给启动器root权限,才可以正常使用。 内置解密全都为算法解密,不动内存 具体辅助驱动请查看历史记录找到对应游戏的压缩包里有对应驱动下载。 爱玩解密内核主频道 @BYGWJJ 永久公益卡密@BYGWJJ 反馈频道 @bhsfss
👍6
●M三角洲自动注入 〖无需框架无需虚拟机〗 ✅人物透视✓人物上色✓ ✅磁吸自瞄✓人物高亮✓ 免ROOT自动注入傻瓜式操作 ●一键开启实现真正的免ROOT
👍13
爱玩系列全系公益内核启动器3.5 重构无畏契约瓦的驱动。增加时间驱动,rt-qx 目前RT-QX,TWT,paradise,时间。 内置 1.lolm 2.无畏契约 3.失控进化 4.和平精英 集成多款爱玩系列辅助,只是一个启动器,本质还是内核,不影响稳定性 内置 1.lolm 2.无畏契约 3.失控进化 4.和平精英 无法过频道验证的自己执行过验证(https://t.me/BYGWJJ/19430) 全部都为内核,需给启动器root权限,才可以正常使用。 内置解密全都为算法解密,不动内存 具体辅助驱动请查看历史记录找到对应游戏的压缩包里有对应驱动下载。 爱玩解密内核主频道 @BYGWJJ 永久公益卡密@BYGWJJ 反馈频道 @bhsfss
👍6
❗️❗️soso搜索资源群 🥰 🥰🥰🥰 🥰🥰🥰 ✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/+HW1WlJwttZhjMjBl https://t.me/+HW1WlJwttZhjMjBl 🥰点击链接加入🥰
👍3
爱玩系列全系公益内核启动器3.4 重构lolm驱动。增加时间驱动,rt-qx 目前RT-QX,TWT,paradise,时间,纯C 内置 1.lolm 2.无畏契约 3.失控进化 4.和平精英 集成多款爱玩系列辅助,只是一个启动器,本质还是内核,不影响稳定性 内置 1.lolm 2.无畏契约 3.失控进化 4.和平精英 无法过频道验证的自己执行过验证(https://t.me/BYGWJJ/19430) 全部都为内核,需给启动器root权限,才可以正常使用。 内置解密全都为算法解密,不动内存 具体辅助驱动请查看历史记录找到对应游戏的压缩包里有对应驱动下载。 爱玩解密内核主频道 @BYGWJJ 永久公益卡密@BYGWJJ 反馈频道 @bhsfss
👍11❤6
M-DFM-防掉框4.0.sh 绕过新检测 官方频道 https://t.me/ij666666 反馈 @mysooy 永久公益 #三角洲
🖕15❤5👍5🤨2
Posted without readable text
👍7❤2
单解密反馈
❤17👍3
这两天就不更新了,一个内透一个单解密够你们玩了,我要出去旅行放松一下😋
❤14
最好是刷上这个,否则可能网波
❤12👍3
使用方法,刷入防网波模块,然后尽量使用终端执行,进入大厅的一瞬间,赶紧去执行解密,然后第三方绘制你们任意搭配,智商都高点,这玩意只会导致网波点禁令,你们环境做好点没啥事的卡密是 @wuai99
❤18💩9👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @wuai99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 559,180 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吾爱公益内核主频道(三角洲/和平精英/王者荣耀)” (@wuai99), 14,729 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wuai99.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.