Channel
@GoldandSilverScoop
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,132subscribers
-410 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002162115740 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GoldandSilverScoop |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GoldandSilverScoop |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 17,132 | -35 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 17,167 | -18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 17,185 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:34 | 17,193 | -16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 17,209 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 17,217 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 17,235 | -18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 17,253 | -19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 17,272 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 17,278 | -22 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 17,300 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 17,311 | -20 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 17,331 | -26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 17,357 | -23 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 17,380 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 17,386 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 17,396 | -15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 17,411 | -23 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 17,434 | -19 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 17,453 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (22 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 98,952 |
| Reactions total | 162 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,052 reactions across 30 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.14% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🆒 | 167 | 8.14% | |
| 🥰 | 163 | 7.94% | |
| 🏆 | 152 | 7.41% | |
| 😘 | 145 | 7.07% | |
| 🕊 | 143 | 6.97% | |
| 🤣 | 122 | 5.95% | |
| 😁 | 117 | 5.70% | |
| 😎 | 116 | 5.65% | |
| 😇 | 101 | 4.92% | |
| 💅 | 93 | 4.53% | |
| 🫡 | 91 | 4.43% | |
| 🙏 | 88 | 4.29% | |
| 🤩 | 87 | 4.24% | |
| 🤪 | 84 | 4.09% | |
| 🍓 | 81 | 3.95% | |
| 👏 | 77 | 3.75% | |
| 🤗 | 76 | 3.70% | |
| ❤ | 75 | 3.65% | |
| 🎉 | 74 | 3.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,052 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
DNB pulled 86 tonnes from NY and Ottawa to London. Why? They say it is for deployability. I say they see the writing on the wall. The market is rigged anyway. My hands are shaking. If they really wanted that gold safe, they would have brought it to Amsterdam. Instead, they moved it to the biggest liquid pit in the world. It is about speed. If the US dollar starts bleeding out, they need that bullion accessible before…
rbc is peddling the gold narrative again. they see four grand plus while the rest of us watch the yield curve bleed us dry. they ignore the fed hike odds because central banks are buying, or so the story goes. i think the suit is just looking for someone to hold his bags while the treasury market nukes itself. my coffee is lukewarm and tastes like burnt rubber. if the bond market breaks, gold might hold, but you know…
Gold is puking under four four. Watching yields climb globally feels like a bad joke on a Tuesday. UK yields at levels from before I even started trading. My barista has a better plan than the fed. Warsh is out here swinging hawkish hammers and the market is bleeding out in real time. If they hike in December, these precious metals are going to zero. Why do we even bother with non-yielding rocks when treasuries final…
Gold at 4600 is just the latest way they are printing money to death. It is all math games now, watching the central banks panic-buy like they are getting liquidated by their own shadow. The pigeons are starting to smell the smoke. My bagel is stale and this market is a rigged casino. Goldman wants 4900 but who cares. The real play is the sovereign hoarding because they know the dollar is a rusty anchor. If the rates…
UBS is pumping gold to 5400. That is a massive number, even for them. They say it is because the dollar is losing its grip and central banks are hoarding bullion like there is no tomorrow. It sounds like a sales pitch to get retail to hold the bag while the big boys rotate into hard assets. The coffee machine is leaking again. If they are right, it means the system is bleeding out, and if they are wrong, you are just…
Doshi is calling for 5k gold by year end and 10k long term. My coffee is cold and the market is lying. They talk about this debasement trade like it is a new discovery, ignoring that the fiscal rot has been systemic for decades. If you think the Fed will actually let gold run while the debt ceiling is a perpetual theater act, you are deluding yourself. They need the wash to stay profitable. If we hit 5k, it just mean…
Look at this mess. Silver orders for 2032? My coffee tastes like battery acid today. It is a joke. The mines are dying, the permitting process is a bureaucratic black hole, and the solar boys are vacuuming up every gram before it even leaves the dirt. You want to trade this? You are holding bags that have not even been pulled from the crust yet. The spot price is a phantom. If you think the wash is clean, you are del…
Treasury is juicing the long end again. Doubling buybacks to 4 billion a pop, they think they can just prop up these bonds until the heat death of the universe. My bagel is stale and this market is a meat grinder. The dollar is bleeding out while gold hits new highs because everyone knows the game is rigged. If they keep suppressing yields like this, the currency starts looking like Monopoly money. You hold dollars, …
Blackrock just dumped over a billion into hecla. 70 million shares. That is a massive position for a mid-tier miner that cant even beat a basic earnings estimate. My coffee tastes like battery acid and these suits are probably just chasing the commodity supercycle myth. If their models fail, they just print more paper. The stock is a beta-heavy nightmare, swinging between 7 and 34 bucks while everyone pretends the ma…
Silver is hitting 71 and the boys in suits are screaming about a structural breakout while I just watch the order flow dry up. The fed blinked on that job report so now the paper pushers think rate hikes are dead. It is convenient how the math works when you ignore the rot in the plumbing. My cat hates the rain. If bond buybacks suppress long-term yields like Bessent plans, then precious metals look like a shiny dist…
Ghana is grabbing 30 percent of the gold output now. It is a classic move to back the cedi while the mining giants scream about margins. My latte is lukewarm and tastes like burnt rubber. If the state thinks they can just force refining without a massive infrastructure disaster, they are delusional. The refining game is dirty, capital-intensive, and prone to corruption. If the refineries fail to meet international pu…
Citi is pushing silver to 90 bucks while the rest of us watch it bleed out from that 121 high. They think investment demand saves the day because solar is tanking. My shoes are leaking. And they really expect us to believe that rate cuts make it all better when the fed is just guessing. It is a shell game. You trade the hype or you get wrecked holding bags that nobody wants. If the strait of hormuz goes sideways we g…
👏1😘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @GoldandSilverScoop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gold & Silver Scoop ☕️⛓️” (@GoldandSilverScoop), 17,132 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoldandSilverScoop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.