Ledn just dumped 188 million of bitcoin backed loans into a bond wrapper and Wall Street is lapping it up like it is fresh cream. They got S&P to slap a rating on these balloon loans which is just a fancy way of saying they hope the price of bitcoin doesnt tank before the note matures. And my bagel is stale. If these borrowers get wrecked and the collateral liquidation loop fails during a flash crash, the bondholders…

Channel
Cryptofiy News
@cryptofiynews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,471subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002209758688 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptofiynews |
| Description | Providing comprehensive coverage of the blockchain and fintech sectors. Delivering structured news, technical updates, and industry insights for the digital finance community. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptofiynews |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 18,471 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.7%
- avg views ÷ 18,471 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,480
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.767%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 109,540 |
| Reactions total | 694 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
694 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 70 | 10.1% | |
| 😎 | 58 | 8.36% | |
| 🕊 | 57 | 8.21% | |
| 🤪 | 56 | 8.07% | |
| 🆒 | 45 | 6.48% | |
| 🤗 | 42 | 6.05% | |
| 👏 | 41 | 5.91% | |
| 🤩 | 37 | 5.33% | |
| 🎉 | 34 | 4.90% | |
| 💅 | 34 | 4.90% | |
| 😘 | 34 | 4.90% | |
| 🥰 | 31 | 4.47% | |
| 😁 | 28 | 4.03% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 3.46% | |
| 🍓 | 23 | 3.31% | |
| 🙏 | 23 | 3.31% | |
| 🫡 | 21 | 3.03% | |
| 🤣 | 20 | 2.88% | |
| 😇 | 16 | 2.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 694reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Metaplanet is buying a shell company to pivot into the US market using their own btc stash instead of dumping shares on retail. It is a flex, I guess. My toaster is broken. By dumping 2,100 bitcoin into a Nasdaq ticker, they are trying to bridge Tokyo and New York without getting wrecked by the SEC or interest rate swings. But what happens when the yen carry trade unwinds again? They are locking up equity for five ye…
Jpmorgan is playing both sides again. They tell dimon to bash bitcoin on cnbc but secretly they are setting up the pipes for crypto-backed loans. It is the same old game. You park your btc, take a 50 percent haircut, and wait for the liquidation. My shoes are falling apart. They are basically treating your hard-earned digital bags like corporate collateral. If the price flash-crashes, they get to keep the keys while …
Galaxy Digital is pivoting to become the plumbing for Bank Leumi. Boring stuff. Just another layer of corporate middle-men taking a cut of every trade while the retail crowd gets wrecked on slippage. If you think this makes crypto safer, you are naive. But they are shifting to a white-label model to avoid the stink of retail exchanges. My chair is squeaking. Basically, they want steady SaaS fees instead of gambling w…
🍓1👏1🤩1😁1
JPMorgan and the boys at DTCC finally rigged the plumbing to run on blockchain, just so they can shave milliseconds off collateral calls while we sleep. It is not about decentralization, it is about owning the tracks so they can extract fees at 3 am without human intervention. The coffee is bitter as hell today. If these repo trades go automated, they just made it easier to lock up liquidity during a crash, turning t…
🆒10🥰7😘7🏆6😁5👏4🤣2
Copper just got their broker-dealer license. SEC and FINRA stamped the papers. They want to be the one-stop-shop for the institutions now. It sounds fancy until you realize they are just building a cage for the big money to bleed out in. If they think this makes crypto safer, they are smoking something. Markets are rigged anyway. My bagel is burnt. They are playing the long game to capture those hedge fund fees while…
😘9🍓6👏5🤣4🤩4🫡4😁3
OCC handing out trust charters like candy at a funeral. They call it professionalization. I call it putting a fed leash on a beast that was never meant to be walked. Now the big pension funds can move their bags into these custody shells without worrying about state-level headaches. But the market is rigged anyway. My bagel is stale. If these firms get a national charter but cant lend or touch retail deposits, they a…
🤩9😁8🍓6👏5🫡5🙏3😇2
JPMorgan is pumping 7 billion a day into this tech and you think it is for your benefit. It is just plumbing. They are replacing old databases with new, proprietary ones to trap liquidity and save on back-office bloodletting. The DTCC is live with tokenized securities and that just means the repo market is going to be faster at nuking the small guys when the next liquidity crunch hits. These guys are not tech visiona…
🆒6🏆5🥰5👏4😁2😘2🤣1
H100 group just dumped 154 mil into bitcoin like they have a death wish or a god complex. My latte tastes like burnt rubber and despair. They are tripling down on bags while the market is getting wrecked by volatility, acting like this is some brilliant hedge against fiat rot when really they are just turning the treasury into a high stakes casino floor. If the cycle flips they are toast, but hey, at least the spread…
😎8🤪7❤6🕊6🤗6🏆5🎉2
Seven billion locked in what looks like a digital vault for bankers who hate crypto. These tradfi suits are allergic to real permissionless systems, so they parked their treasuries in fancy ledgers that dont actually do anything. It is just expensive accounting for people who refuse to play in the deep end. My barista has better investment instincts than the suits at blackrock. If this 1% utilization rate in defi is …
🤩8😘8🫡6🍓4👏4🤣4😁2
Wintermute got their SEC broker-dealer badge. Big deal. Now they get to play in the sandbox with Jane Street and the rest of the sharks. They want to be an authorized participant for these crypto etps, basically the plumbing for the institutional flows. My shoes are leaking. If they think they can squeeze these spreads tighter without blowing their own books in a liquidity crunch, they are dreaming. It is just more m…
🏆7🕊7🤗6😎5🎉4🤪3❤1
Ledn just shoved 188 mill of btc-backed loans into an abs wrapper. S&P stamped a bbb- on the senior paper like they have a shred of honor left. It is just another way to repackage leverage until someone gets liquidated in the middle of the night. Wall street loves the smell of digital fees. The espresso machine is leaking again. If the price of bitcoin takes a nosedive, these sub notes are toast. You think institutio…
💅8🤩6🎉5😇5🫡3🙏3🍓2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptofiynews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@gr0wth_hack · 71,003
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptofiy News” (@cryptofiynews), 18,471 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptofiynews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.