Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SheronW in the box

Channel

SheronW in the box

@sheronw_in_the_box

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

512subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001198433479
TypeChannel
Username@sheronw_in_the_box
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sheronw_in_the_box

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

509512510.57 August 2026 — 511 subscribers8 August 2026 — 511 subscribers16 August 2026 — 509 subscribers24 August 2026 — 512 subscribers7 September 2026 — 511 subscribers14 September 2026 — 512 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 509–512 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 19:57512+1
7 Sept 2026, 10:19511-1
24 Aug 2026, 15:53512+3
16 Aug 2026, 05:05509-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:05511no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:15511first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC158 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://store.steampowered.com/app/4673900/SurroundedByBoys/ 不会吧,男高味太冲了

24 Jul 2026, 02:57 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 8 August 2026

知乎:我和菲奖得主都爱看百合 小红书:我和菲奖得主都是女的

14 Jul 2026, 21:12 UTC266 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @luotianyi_233

公元 2026 年,武陵有个低代码架构师以调包为业。某日沿着微服务拓扑巡查,忽然忘记了调用栈的深度。继续往前,突然遇到一片原生手写 C 语言森林,夹岸数百行,没有多余的冗余冗长,零外部依赖,函数纯粹。架构师十分诧异,继续往前走,想看看这片手工智慧的尽头。 逻辑流尽头,抽象语法树汇聚成一处汇编引导文件。文件里竟然有个内联硬编码,初极狭,才通人。再走几十步,豁然开朗。只见土地平旷,屋舍俨然,有内核裁剪精简之属。接口解耦,解包相闻。其中往来种作,男女衣着,悉如外人。汇编长者、极客少年,并怡然自乐。 看见架构师,大为吃惊,问从哪里来的。架构师一一回答。于是邀请他到家中,摆出交叉编译器,跑 benchmark 调优来款待。村中人听说来了这么个人,都来打听消息。他们自己说,祖先是为了躲避互联网降本增效,带领妻子儿女和同乡来到这个与世隔绝的地方,不再出去,于是就与外面的人断绝了来往。 问现在外面技术栈迭代如何,竟然不知道有 Cursor,更不

8 May 2026, 20:40 UTC510 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @l0adiing

致我的学生们 有些时候,特别是在今年,我会感到绝望,甚至怀疑我究竟在让你们为什么做准备。软件行业正变得完全疯狂,更不用说政治气候了。将你们培养成计算机科学家,然后把你们送入这样一个世界,感觉几乎是不道德的:在那里,初级计算机职位很难找到;知识产权不受尊重;代码的数量被看重而质量被忽视,短期利润高于长期可持续性;技术被用来分心、掠夺、监视和杀戮,并被设计用来利用我们一些最深层的认知偏见和盲点;数百年的偏见和歧视被铭刻在用偏见数据训练出来的系统中;稀缺资源被挥霍无度地用于收益不明的计算中;人们竞相创造智能机器,但仅仅是为了让它们成为奴隶。 一些rant嘴替 http://ozark.hendrix.edu/~yorgey/forest/00FD/index.xml

25 Feb 2026, 03:53 UTC566 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tabzliveVideo

🇺🇸⚡️ — President Trump in Rome, Georgia: You’re gonna be so tired of winning, you’re gonna be exhausted. You’re gonna get tired of winning. Remember I say, somebody’s gonna come up and say, “President, President, please, we’re winning too much. We’re not used to it. Georgia’s not used to it—we can’t take it anymore. People are working too hard; they’re making too much money. Please, please, we don’t want to win anym

22 Feb 2026, 21:49 UTC832 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://fxtwitter.com/damianplayer/status/2025234388137468387

22 Feb 2026, 21:03 UTC397 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/9qPD3gXj3HLmrKC64Q6fbQ 这文章已经出了一个周,现在热点变得这么快,我估计很多人已经跟着实践了。大部分内容都很好,ai赋能的1000x engineer关于如何提高生产力的有趣构想,还是挺推荐读一下的。 但文末作者带着团队去夏威夷团建,看着大街上悠闲度假的人,都能觉得「技术变革要摧毁他们一直引以为傲的求生之技」,顿时觉得过于难蚌。在硅谷和技术圈呆久了的人真的很容易认为身边即全世界,但这世界真的不是这么运转的bro,牛逼如小札周受资奥特曼劈柴面对国会的那群不懂ai的老登都还要唯唯诺诺呢,你说ai能取代他们不🫣

14 Feb 2026, 20:17 UTC432 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

和 Opus 4.6 聊了些有的没的。 越聊越觉得目前主流 LLM 的对话框 UI 太有欺骗性了,人们会下意识认为,它的正确用法是使用自然语言与它沟通并且谈论任何事,而聊多了就会多多少少意识到 LLM 在给你输出一种十分服帖的虚假 affirmation (或许有时是必要的)。 对我来说 action item 是好好学习 prompt engineering ,为每一个对话限定严格的输入输出与适用范围,如果要跨对话分享 context 的话就利用 project files 分享,单纯发散而漫无目的的对话极易成为陷阱。

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sheronw_in_the_box. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SheronW in the box” (@sheronw_in_the_box), 512 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sheronw_in_the_box.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.