Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 63.1%
- avg views ÷ 104 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 65.7
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
9 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC34 viewsread 9 August 2026 尚不清楚пельмени是何时进入西伯利亚原住民族的饮食,也不清楚它们最初何时出现在俄罗斯菜系中。一种理论认为,пельмени,或者说带馅的水煮饺子这一类食物整体上起源于西伯利亚;它可能是中国饺子(цзяоцзы,在某些中国方言中被称为баомиан「包麵/包面」)的简化改良版,由蒙古人从中国带到西伯利亚和乌拉尔地区的,并从那里逐渐传播到东欧,进入俄罗斯人以及中国其他邻近民族——朝鲜人和中亚各民族——的民族菜系。пельмени在俄罗斯猎人中尤其受欢迎。
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8
Signed Mistivia
9 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC35 viewsread 9 August 2026 俄罗斯人过年也包饺子?
Signed Mistivia
9 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC35 viewsread 9 August 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Mistivia
9 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC36 viewsread 9 August 2026 https://trinixy.ru/7039-sssr_v_fotografijakh_100_foto.html
Signed Mistivia
8 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC48 viewsread 9 August 2026 Photo
https://www.noemamag.com/why-is-everyone-in-tech-so-sad/
Signed Mistivia
8 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC49 viewsread 9 August 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Mistivia
8 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC52 viewsread 9 August 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Mistivia
8 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC52 viewsread 9 August 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Mistivia
7 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC62 viewsread 9 August 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Mistivia
5 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC66 viewsread 9 August 2026 纷纷跑路
Signed Mistivia
5 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC72 viewsread 9 August 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Mistivia
4 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC75 viewsread 9 August 2026 光圈、快门速度、感光度什么的换算感觉已经很熟练了,手动对焦能力也马马虎虎,唯一经常出问题的是拍猫,拍猫的对焦就从来没准过。
Signed Mistivia
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @l0adiing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 749,733 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Loading...” (@l0adiing), 104 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/l0adiing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.