Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

The Fort

@theFort2019

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

228subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001264375930
TypeChannel
Username@theFort2019
DescriptionAt the end of the world, sometimes love is the ultimate crime.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/theFort2019

Growth

2287 Aug 2026, 23:52 — 228 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:17 — 228 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:528 Aug 2026, 10:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 227–229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:17228no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:52228first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.0%
avg views ÷ 228 subscribers
Avg views / post
77.6
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (25 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total388
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
106
Videos
8
Links
379

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC53 viewsread 8 August 2026

有段时间没有玩到如此细腻动人的demo了。几十分钟里,喜怒哀乐循环往复,如同春风中盘旋的风筝。 https://store.steampowered.com/app/3473430/_All_Our_Broken_Parts/

31 Jul 2026, 19:18 UTC63 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @yahnc

Bad Apple but It's Traceroute https://jssfr.de/2026-07-27-bad-apple-but-traceroute.html

31 Jul 2026, 03:25 UTC66 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://itsmevox.substack.com/p/im-38-and-i-cant-support-myself-anymore

24 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC140 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sheronw_in_the_box

知乎:我和菲奖得主都爱看百合 小红书:我和菲奖得主都是女的

8 Jul 2026, 04:39 UTC195 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheTeletypePhoto

Goose Philosophy. ▎Source

4 Jul 2026, 05:54 UTC137 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhihu_bazaar

如何评价美国最高法院驳回特朗普“出生公民权”行政令? | 原文

2 Jul 2026, 22:11 UTC119 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://store.steampowered.com/app/4776100/Dust_Front_RTS_Demo/ RTS+4X 还有毛子特有的灰色牲口的劲 味真足

25 Jun 2026, 09:07 UTC111 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @peopleofscreen

“认知游击战”。 科技巨头在建造宏大的“系统”(如庞大的AI模型),而我们作为个体,最好的反击不是去造更大的系统,而是在微观层面重建“工具”与“感知”的连接。 这里有三个具体的行动方向: 拒绝“毁灭论”的恐吓(破除“应该”): 下次听到有人说“AI会让所有人都失业”时,不要陷入恐慌,也不要盲目反驳。试着问一句:“对谁有利?”​ 这种问题能瞬间戳破谎言,让你看清这到底是趋势,还是某种商业策略。 支持“小作坊”式的创新(寻找佛罗伦萨): 关注那些开源的、去中心化的、由小型团队开发的AI工具。这些工具往往更透明,更注重隐私,且允许你修改(就像用可擦除的墨水写字)。它们不是要接管你的生活,而是要帮你更好地生活。 坚持“低效”的人文关怀(感知苦行): 无论AI写诗多快,坚持亲手给朋友写一张卡片;无论AI总结多准,坚持亲自读完一本书。这种“低效”不是落后,而是对“人”的主体性的坚守。正如你所说,辨别力是关键——我们要辨别出哪些是机器的“高效

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @theFort2019. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Fort” (@theFort2019), 228 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theFort2019.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.