Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

☀️Семья на Маркетплейсах

@sellermp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

47,913subscribers

-92 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001272317969
TypeChannel
Username@sellermp
DescriptionСергей и Виктория Делимся фишками продвижения🚀 ГЛАВНОЕ: https://t.me/sellermp/6422 ЧАТ: https://t.me/sellermpchat Помощь поставщикам: @c_hubai РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6752c4ea46efdb335e2b21ef&registryType=bloggersPermission
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sellermp

Growth

47,91348,01147,9627 August 2026 — 48,005 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48,011 subscribers9 August 2026 — 47,987 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47,958 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47,945 subscribers11 August 2026 — 47,946 subscribers12 August 2026 — 47,913 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,898–48,026 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:0347,913-33
11 Aug 2026, 22:5247,946+1
10 Aug 2026, 22:3647,945-13
10 Aug 2026, 02:1147,958-29
9 Aug 2026, 05:0147,987-24
8 Aug 2026, 02:1048,011+6
7 Aug 2026, 08:3348,005first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 47,913 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,060
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held49 (5 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total296,910
Reactions total5,516
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,130
Videos
583
Links
1,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

5,516 reactions across 48 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,81833.0%
👀86215.6%
🤣75613.7%
😢64711.7%
👎4718.54%
2504.53%
🔥2193.97%
💯1112.01%
💩921.67%
😱771.40%
😁611.11%
🤬330.598%
😎310.562%
220.399%
custom 5323513071770033159160.29%
💔120.218%
🤩120.218%
🤝80.145%
70.127%
👌50.091%
2 further kinds60.109%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,516reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 49 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sellermp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC≈2,030 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @rwb_press_service

Из-за воздушной атаки в Башкирии на территорию промышленной зоны, где расположен один из объектов компании, произошло возгорание. На месте работают пожарные расчёты. На объекте была проведена заблаговременная эвакуация в соответствии с требованиями безопасности. На указанном объекте хранение товаров не осуществляется.

😱12😢3

12 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC≈4,480 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

НАКОНЕЦ-ТО СПП ВЕРНУЛСЯ 😁

👀20🤩11😱62

12 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈5,240 views1,310 reactionsread 13 August 2026

А где деньги друзья? Вам пришли? ДА 👍 НЕТ 👀

👍663👀647

12 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈4,180 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @rwb_press_service

Приложение Wildberries в App Store в США будет снова доступно для скачивания и обновления в ближайшее время. Во всех странах, кроме США, приложение в сторах доступно и работает в обычном режиме.

🔥62

12 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈4,870 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Удалили и WB из App Store USA

👀14😱9👌5👍1

12 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC≈5,030 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026

‼️‼️‼️Какой увас СПП ? В комментариях напишите: категория/ цена товара / СПП У многих заказы упали, потому что СПП - 0

🤬27👎2😱2

12 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈5,180 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Ozon Банк удалили из Google Pay. Если удалили там, то, скорее всего, скоро удалят и из App Store. Ранее уже писали об этом: https://t.me/sellermp/10538 Но нам не привыкать - придумают костыли 😄

2

12 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC≈5,750 views154 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🤣🤣🤣

🤣133😁13💯61🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC≈5,540 views48 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Причина почему мы последний месяц продавцы не спят, повышается интелект. 🚀 В текущих ситуациях точно умнее станешь, 🧠 столько идей нагенерили.... Всем доброе утро ☀️☀️

22🤣18👀53

11 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC≈5,580 views15 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

Коллеги, у кого как налажена система фбс? Какие проги стоят? Какие сканеры? Как данные перегружаются в 1с и в честный знак? Делитесь опытом, может что-то лучшее знаете, а мы тут мучаемся Ей богу с ума сходим всей командой 😭🤯😵‍💫

10💯3👍2

11 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC≈5,520 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

Вы попали в этот список ?

  1. Да36%
  2. Нет64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

11 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈4,810 views18 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @wbsellerofficial

Открываем возможность досрочно отключить опции и пакеты конструктора тарифов для продавцов, у которых пострадала значительная доля товаров в качестве дополнительной меры поддержки Всем, кто сможет отключить опции и пакеты досрочно, отправим в ближайшее время персональную новость с инструкцией. Сейчас в список попали предприниматели, у которых из-за атак на склады Wildberries пострадала большая доля товаров. Если вы

👀123😱3

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @sellermp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTCAnonymous Poll696 voters

Вы попали в этот список ?

  1. Да36%
  2. Нет64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTCAnonymous Poll1,460 voters approx.

Многие перестраиваются. Что вы делаете, что бы не держать одни яйца 🥚 фиолетовой корзине?

  1. Вышли/усиливаем Ozon🛍52%
  2. Рассматриваю: Ламода, ЯМ, МВ и тд. 🛍🛍🛍26%
  3. Сайт и внешний трафик, соц.сети. 📷💬📷💬📺19%
  4. Другие МП СНГ6%
  5. Другие МП (Европа, Бразилия, USA и тд).5%
  6. Ваш вариант в комментариях14%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 52,705 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

WB Партнёры
@wbsellerofficial · 183,362
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“☀️Семья на Маркетплейсах” (@sellermp), 47,913 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sellermp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.