Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

МИЛЛИАРД НА СУМКАХ💰

@steputenkov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,293subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001077785502
TypeChannel
Username@steputenkov
Description@Repliner_Bot - AI-агент ответов на отзывы WB, Ozon и Яндекс Маркет Дмитрий Степутенков Канал про бизнес на маркетплейсах от ТОП селлера Я начал торговать на WB в марте 2021 года. Продаю сумки на WB, OZON, Яндекс маркет и Lamoda.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/steputenkov

Growth

16,29316,34216,317.56 August 2026 — 16,342 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,342 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,340 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,331 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,315 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,307 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,303 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,308 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,293 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,286–16,349 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:2216,293-15
11 Aug 2026, 00:4516,308+5
10 Aug 2026, 02:4116,303-4
9 Aug 2026, 05:0116,307-8
8 Aug 2026, 01:4616,315-16
7 Aug 2026, 01:2716,331-9
6 Aug 2026, 03:4016,340-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:1916,342no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:3516,342first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 16,293 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,160
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held31 (31 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total97,990
Reactions total1,409
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
906
Videos
141
Links
138

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,328 reactions across 28 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍26419.9%
😭23317.5%
🔥21115.9%
custom 544950595028307847419314.5%
🤣18413.9%
😁1229.19%
👎765.72%
🤬261.96%
🥴90.678%
50.377%
🗿20.151%
😐20.151%
custom 544528498097862138710.075%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,409reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 31 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @steputenkov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,050 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Напоминаю, что завтра начнется крупная бесплатная конференция. Я также выступаю Тем, кто хотел, но отложил — регистрация открыта до эфира (расписание трех дней там же)

custom 54495059502830784745👍3🔥3👎1

11 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC≈1,830 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Если серьезно, то для бизнеса это большая проблема. Мы заранее заказали товар под сезон, рассчитывая на продажи через все маркетплейсы. Но сейчас канал FBW на Wildberries фактически выпадает, потому что объем продаж там существенно сократился. Да, мы активно перестраиваемся и начинаем работать по FBS. Распределяем товар по регионам, ищем партнерские фулфилменты и заново выстраиваем логистику. Но нужно честно призн

👍20🔥8custom 54495059502830784745

11 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,740 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Хотел пошутить, что на крайний случай загружу весь сток в Коледино и Казань, а потом скажу китайцам что денег нет, но не буду. Слишком жестко 😑

🤣17😁2custom 54495059502830784741

11 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC≈1,750 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

А вот это правильно, мы любим переработки и работу без выходных 😁 Правда, теперь это надо еще как-то продать..

😁12👍3custom 54495059502830784742

11 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,020 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Как wb-шнику быстро выйти на Ozon? Фишки и ключевые отличия от WB 1 из 20 тем, что разбираем 13, 14, 15 августа на эфирах по свободной регистрации Тема моего выступления уже опубликована в общем расписании Расписание 🔥 Онлайн-конференция на 3 дня от wbcom.ru, где выступят 25 экспертов, в числе которых — Сергей Федоринов (Юлмарт), Максим Обушенков (Revyline), Виталий Теин, Вячеслав Малых, Данил Овчинников и еще 20

custom 544950595028307847481👍1🔥1custom 54452849809786213871

11 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC≈2,150 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Склад в Воронеже вроде бы потушили, и товар сильно не пострадал. Я уже перестал следить за каждой новостью. У нас тут своя движуха: перестраиваем процессы, решаем задачи. В любой ситуации главное — не опускать руки и двигаться дальше. Проблемы не закончатся. Но и мы останавливаться не собираемся.

🔥23👍8🤣3custom 54495059502830784741

10 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈2,680 views75 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Что там с СПП? 😬 Какая у вас ситуация? 👇🏻

👎63👍6🗿2😁2😭2

7 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈4,160 views80 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Я сейчас как многорукий многоног Вся эта ситуация заставила очень активно шевелиться 😁 Каждый день сотня дел, десятки горящих чатов, новые задачи и процессы, которые приходится выстраивать буквально на ходу. Я ничего не успеваю. Только закрываю один вопрос, как появляются еще три. Но самое интересное, что энергии сейчас очень много. На полном энтузиазме продолжаю работать, принимать решения и двигаться вперед 🔥

🔥48custom 544950595028307847419👍9👎2🤣2

7 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC≈3,830 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Всем привет. Что там в ЕКБ, кто-то знает?

🥴7😭4custom 54495059502830784743

6 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC≈3,790 views51 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥27👍14custom 544950595028307847410

5 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈4,540 views24 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

В чате пишут, что при приемке поставок FBS Wildberries начал замерять товары. Знаете, что будет дальше? Много фотографий с криво приложенной линейкой и много штрафов. Искренне рекомендую подключить бесплатный сервис, который присылает уведомления о новых замерах. Две минуты на подключение могут сэкономить вам сотни тысяч рублей. 👉 @Repliner_Bot

👍13🔥6🤣3👎1custom 54495059502830784741

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @steputenkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 136,376 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

WB Партнёры
@wbsellerofficial · 183,389
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МИЛЛИАРД НА СУМКАХ💰” (@steputenkov), 16,293 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/steputenkov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.