Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Buletin Fitnah

@BuletinFitnah

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,056subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001432445925
TypeChannel
Username@BuletinFitnah
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BuletinFitnah

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,0561,0581,0577 August 2026 — 1,056 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,057 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,058 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,056 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,056–1,058 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:131,056-2
10 Aug 2026, 14:041,058+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:531,057+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:311,056first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.1%
avg views ÷ 1,056 subscribers
Avg views / post
550
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held17 (23 May 202620 July 2026)
Views total1,650
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC639 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/BuletinFitnah/1318 Melabeli para ustadz atau ikhwan yang mentahdzir penyimpangan serta kerusakan mereka dalam beragama dengan sebutan “polisi manhaj” adalah tuduhan yang lahir dari KEDUNGUAN terhadap syariat. Agama Islam tidak hanya memerintahkan menyampaikan kebenaran, tetapi juga memperingatkan dari kebatilan. Sebagaimana ada dakwah kepada Sunnah, ada pula tahdzir dari bid’ah dan penyimpangan. Janga

20 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC529 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @abuhazim_faris

.... Apakah Kemarahan Bermula dari Kesombongan? Tidak semua kemarahan berawal dari kesombongan. Namun, orang yang sombong hampir tidak pernah lepas dari amarahnya. Ada orang yang marah karena kasih sayang, sebagaimana seorang ibu yang menegur anaknya. Ada pula yang marah karena kecemburuan, yang lazim terjadi dalam kehidupan rumah tangga antara suami dan istri yang masih memiliki rasa kecemburuan. Namun, kemarah

15 Jul 2026, 02:41 UTC620 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @datadanfakta

* Apa sikap terhadap berbagai penyimpangan yang selama ini dipermasalahkan para asatidzah? Selama hal-hal tersebut tidak dijelaskan secara terang, maka wajar apabila sebagian ikhwan masih merasa belum tenang. Bukan karena ingin mencari-cari kesalahan, tetapi karena persoalan ini menyangkut arah dakwah, manhaj, dan orang-orang yang akan mengambil ilmu. Apalagi apabila yang lebih sering tampak justru ajakan untuk ti

15 Jul 2026, 02:41 UTC405 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @datadanfaktaPhoto

PUZZLE-Puzzle YANG SALING TERKAIT

15 Jul 2026, 02:41 UTC393 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarah

[ARCHIVE] 🌵⚔️🌵 MANHAJIYAH: PARODI RODJA & BAHAYA LATEN JARINGANNYA Jika tak kenal maka tak waspada 💡Bagi anda yang sudah pernah membaca artikel di bawah ini dan menyaksikan bukti-buktinya maka kumpulan link tulisan ini bisa menjadi bahan untuk merefresh ingatan bahaya jaringan Sururiyun Halabiyun masih ada di depan mata. 🔋Bagi anda yang belum pernah membacanya maka semoga arsip data dan bukti yang terhidang akan m

15 Jul 2026, 02:41 UTC398 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @datadanfakta

SAMBIL MENYERANG MINUM AIR (Hari Ahadi, Antara Dalang Atau Wayang) Secara kronologis https://t.me/datadanfakta/1193 1. Hari Ahadi menegaskan fatwanya atas kesamaan akidah Rodja (Halabiyah Sururiyah Turatsiyah) dengan Salafiyun. https://t.me/BuletinFitnah/1273 2. Umar Jombang mengumumkan melalui statusnya poster seminar online yang masih belum dibuka pendaftarannya pun sudah diminati oleh Ikhwah Singapura 3. Chan

15 Jul 2026, 02:41 UTC432 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @datadanfakta

DATA PRIMER SEJARAH FITNAH SURURIYAH HALABIYAH RODJAIYAH TURATSIYAH DI INDONESIA 1⃣ Persaksian Ust. Muhammad as-Sewed hafizhahullah. Tahdzir Asy-Syaikh Rabi' rahimahullah terhadap Al-Sofwa al-Muntada sebagai cangkang fitnah Sururiyah di Indonesia (sebelum lahirnya cangkang baru mereka, Rodja): » https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/1964 2⃣ Buku Putih I: » https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/1961 3⃣ Buku Putih 2: » https://t

15 Jul 2026, 02:41 UTC564 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @datadanfakta

CATATAN KRITIS TERHADAP PERYATAAN HARI AHADI 1. Apa yang dimaksud dengan "memuji Rodja"? Pada poin pertama disebutkan bahwa tidak pernah ada pujian kepada Rodja, bahkan sampai disertai sumpah. Namun perlu dijelaskan terlebih dahulu, apa definisi "pujian" yang dimaksud? Apabila seseorang mengatakan bahwa Rodja, RII, dan yang semisalnya masih Ahlus Sunnah, atau memberikan kesan bahwa penyimpangan mereka bukan perk

22 Jun 2026, 03:54 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 7 August 2026

☝🏾SILAHKAN DIBACA DAN DIRENUNGKAN KEMBALI PARA FACEBOOKER YANG MENGAKU AHLUSSUNNAH TAPI KERJAANNYA SETIAP HARI MENCELA DAN MENGKRITISI PEMERINTAH DAN USTADZ-USTADZNYA TERUTAMA MEREKA YANG ADA DI GROUP INI 👉🏾 https://t.me/BuletinFitnah/1257 SEMOGA ALLAH MEMBERI KALIAN HIDAYAH

22 Jun 2026, 03:45 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔗 Imam Ahmad Rahimahullah, termasuk ulama yang didholimi penguasa, dicambuk dan dipenjara. Beliau sampaikan akidah kaum muslimin, al Qur'an kalamullah/ ucapan Allah, bukan makhluk. Ada kaum muslimin yang kasihan kepada beliau, mari kita memberontak penguasa atas perlakuan kepadamu. 📌 Maka Imam Ahmad berkata, Jangan!, jangan itu pertumpahan darah, yang didholimi beliau, dipenjara beliau, yang disakiti beliau, Masyar

22 Jun 2026, 03:44 UTC928 viewsread 7 August 2026

1️⃣ Hancur agamanya, hancur aqidahnya karena dikatakan oleh Nabi, merekaMunafik 2️⃣ Hancur dunianya, apabila dia diciduk oleh penguasa karena mencela penguasa 3️⃣ Akan dihinakan oleh Allah. Yang menghinakan penguasa, Allah akan menghinakannya (hadits Nabi) 4️⃣ Munculnya pemberontak kepada Penguasa/ kudeta/ kelompok sparatis 💎 Islam mengecam keras pemberontakan penguasa, dengan berbagai macam bentuk pemberontakan, ba

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @BuletinFitnah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 779,497 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Buletin Fitnah” (@BuletinFitnah), 1,056 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BuletinFitnah.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.