Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tukpencarialhaqnews

Channel

Tukpencarialhaqnews

@tukpencarialhaqnews

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,337subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001002914334
TypeChannel
Username@tukpencarialhaqnews
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tukpencarialhaqnews

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,3371,3611,3495 August 2026 — 1,361 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,361 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,360 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,359 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,356 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,354 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,355 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,352 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,351 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,348 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,346 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,342 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,339 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,337 subscribers5 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,333–1,365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 09:571,337-2
12 Sept 2026, 23:181,339-3
8 Sept 2026, 16:161,342-4
3 Sept 2026, 14:571,346-2
31 Aug 2026, 06:471,348-3
28 Aug 2026, 02:031,351-1
25 Aug 2026, 00:251,352-3
21 Aug 2026, 13:241,355+1
15 Aug 2026, 10:151,354-2
12 Aug 2026, 07:421,356-3
9 Aug 2026, 03:541,359-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:281,360-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:001,361no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:091,361first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC≈18 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarah

6. MEMBONGKAR KONTRADIKSI PEMBELAAN "SYAIKH UTSAIMIN" TERHADAP SYAIKH BESAR RODJA (NARAPIDANA AKIDAH MURJI'AH ALI HASAN AL-HALABI): KLAIM FATWA YANG RUNTUH DARI TULISANNYA SENDIRI https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/3348 Pernyataan Ali al-Halabi dalam teks pembelaannya mengandung kontradiksi logika mendasar (تناقض منطقي) dan cacat metodologi ilmiah (anomali amanat ilmiah). Kontradiksi ini secara otomatis merusak kredibil…

5 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC≈20 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarah

3. Kampanye Hitam Atas Nama Syaikh Utsaimin: Penentangan Situs Rodja Terhadap Lajnah Dibakar Semangat Provokatif Pembangkangan Narapidana Akidah Murji'ah Ali Hasan Al-Halabi Jawaban Resmi Situs Rodja: Benarkah Syaikh Ali Al-Halabi Seorang Murji’ah? Ini adalah tuduhan keji dari kaum takfiriyyin terhadap beliau agar pemahaman takfir mereka bisa leluasa menyebar di tengah-tengah umat.¹ https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/3…

5 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC≈13 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarahPhoto

4. LICIKNYA AL-HALABI DAN QIYAS RUSAK HALABIYUN Alih² mendustakan secara ilmiah Jarh Mufassar Lajnah Daimah, narasi pembelaan VONIS MURJI'AHnya AL-HALABI yang dibangun oleh Al-Halabi dan Halabiyun situs Radio Rodja dan Badrusalam melawan Lajnah dengan cara bergelantungan pada ketokohan Syaikh Utsaimin dan Syaikh al-Albani rahimahumallah. A. Realitanya: Al-Fauzan mendustakan tuduhan Murji'ah pada Al-Albani rahimahu…

5 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC≈15 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarah

https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/3343 B. Perbedaan Mendasar https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/3343 Tuduhan atas Syaikh al-Albani: Berasal dari orang-orang ekstrem/Haddadiyah/Khawarij (seperti Hisyam al-Biyali atau kelompok takfiri) tanpa bukti ilmiah yang sah, sehingga ditolak secara tegas oleh Syaikh al-Fauzan. Bukan hanya Syaikh Al-Fauzan, bahkan situs Rodja sendiri secara resmi mengakui pengingkaran Syaikh Utsaimin t…

5 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC≈23 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarahPhoto

TANAZZUL JADALI, SEJENAK 'BERGEMBIRA' BERSAMA KLAIM ALI HASAN AL-HALABI DAN HALABIYUN RODJA, FATWA SYAIKH UTSAMIN BENAR² NYATA MEMBELA AL-HALABI? Tanazzul Jadali. Anggaplah pernyataan Syaikh Utsaimin tersebut didukung fakta yang kuat. Namun kenapa Halabiyun Rodja dan para dedengkotnya hanya menyebarkan pernyataan Syaikh pada kotak pertama dan tidak menyebarkan pernyataan Syaikh Utsaimin pada kotak kedua untuk mendel…

5 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC≈27 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarah

5. AL-HALABI MEMBONGKAR KELICIKAN PARA PEMBELANYA, HALABIYUN RODJA DAN PARA DAI DEDENGKOTNYA https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/3346 Tanazzul Jadali sebagai cara efektif untuk menguliti kontradiksi dan kelicikan penyebaran propaganda (tadlis) Halabiyun Rodja dan para dedengkotnya. Berikut poin-poin argumentatif untuk mematahkan syubhat dan membongkar cara² licik pembelaan Halabiyun Rodja dan para dedengkot dainya terha…

5 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC≈38 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarahPhoto

🔥Al-Halabi Meruntuhkan Fatwa (Syaikh Utsaimin) Yang Dia Bangun Sendiri, Halaman Bukunya Menjadi Saksi⚠️ Firman Allah Ta'ala: وَلَا يَحِيقُ الْمَكْرُ السَّيِّئُ إِلَّا بِأَهْلِهِ "Rencana jahat/makar yang buruk itu tidak akan menimpa kecuali kepada orang yang merencanakannya sendiri." (QS. Fathir: 43) Demikian pula mengingatkan kita pada pepatah: مَنْ حَفَرَ حُفْرَةً لِأَخِيهِ وَقَعَ فِيْهَا "Barangsiapa menggal…

3 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC≈32 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarahPhoto

⚠️🚦Hasil Pelacakan Sumber Penyebaran Propaganda Situs Halabiyun Rodja Dan Dedengkotnya Tentang Penentangan Syaikh "Utsaimin" Terhadap Keputusan Lajnah Terhadap Murji'ah nya Ali Hasan Al-Halabi: Ternyata di Buku Tulisan Pembelaan (Diri) Al-Halabi Sendiri!

3 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC≈27 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarah

⏱ Mendedah Propaganda Halabiyun Rodja: Ketidaksukaan Al-Allamah Ibnu Utsaimin rahimahullah terhadap Tahdzir Lajnah Atas Madzhab Murji'ah nya Al-Halabi dari 4 sisi: 1. Menegakkan Akal Waras 2. Sumber fatwa 3. Pengakuan yang memberatkan 4. Kecurangan Halabiyun Rodja dalam memotong dan menyembunyikan ucapan Syaikh "Utsaimin" lainnya dari sumber rujukan mereka. Insyaallah....

3 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC≈41 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarah

🥨 HALAMAN UTUH SUMBER PROPAGANDA SITUS RODJA DAN DEDENGKOTNYA (Bahwa Syaikh Utsaimin Menentang Dan Menyalahkan Fatwa Lajnah Tentang Peringatan Dari Madzhab Murjiah Ali Hasan Al-Halabi Serta Seruan "Beliau" Untuk Melakukan Penolakan/Pembangkangan Terhadap Fatwa Tersebut) Perhatikanlah -wahai Hari Ahadi- bukti² yang kami tampilkan di bawah ini bahwa narasi² provokatif pembelaan pemilik Akidah Rodja dan para dedengkotn…

3 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC≈50 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarah

🇮🇩MENDEDAH CACAT ILMIAH FATWA PEMBELAAN SYAIKH "UTSAIMIN" TERHADAP TERPIDANA AKIDAH MURJI'AH ALI HASAN AL-HALABI: SERUAN PENENTANGAN DAN PEMBANGKANGANNYA ATAS LAJNAH https://t.me/sekelumitsejarah/3339 Dari teks lembaran di atas, makin tampak kelemahan metodologis dari pembelaan yang mereka bangun: 1. Pelacakan Jalur Nukilan (Dari Mana Klaim Ini Berasal?) Nukilan atau narasi yang dibawakan (seperti perkataan: "Ini…

3 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC≈59 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sekelumitsejarah

Poin 4: Tahrif Ucapan Syaikh Muhammad bin Ibrahim Alu Syaikh rahimahullah ٤. تَحْرِيفُهُ لِمُرَادِ العَلَّامَةِ الشَّيْخِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِبْرَاهِيمَ آلِ الشَّيْخِ -رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ- فِي رِسَالَتِهِ (تَحْكِيمُ الْقَوَانِينِ)... حَيْثُ زَعَمَ الْمُؤَلِّفُ أَنَّ الشَّيْخَ يَشْتَرِطُ الاِسْتِحْلَالَ القَلْبِيَّ! 4. Pembelokan (tahrif) maksud dari Al-'Allamah Syaikh Muhammad bin Ibrahim Alu Syaikh rahimahullah dalam ri…

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tukpencarialhaqnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tukpencarialhaqnews” (@tukpencarialhaqnews), 1,337 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tukpencarialhaqnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.