Channel
@IROODdesign
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,732subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002180847835 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IROODdesign |
| Created | 2 August 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IROODdesign |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 2,732 | -17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 2,749 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 2,749 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 2 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IROODdesign. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 2 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2024 to 6 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📁 کد: GW-101 📌مدل: «آیرونتِک» (IronTech) «تکنولوژی در حصار چوب و آهن.» ترکیب آهن و چوب طبیعی. جای اختصاصی کنسول. شارژ وایرلس روی میز. داک شارژ دستهها. شیار مخفی لپتاپ. مدیریت هوشمند کابلها. ظریف، مقاوم، ماندگار. برای سفارش به شماره زیر تماس بگیرید. ۰۹۳۳۶۲۰۴۸۱۹📲
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @IROODdesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IROOD” (@IROODdesign), 2,732 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IROODdesign.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.