Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

کنج عزلت | سارا چگنی

@sarachegenii

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

358subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002340174028
TypeChannel
Username@sarachegenii
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sarachegenii

Growth

3483583537 August 2026 — 348 subscribers7 August 2026 — 349 subscribers15 August 2026 — 358 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 347–360 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:02358+9
7 Aug 2026, 18:42349+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:17348first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.8%
avg views ÷ 358 subscribers
Avg views / post
164
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,282
Reactions total308
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

308 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17556.8%
💘258.12%
😍227.14%
👍216.82%
👏196.17%
👌165.19%
😁165.19%
🍓113.57%
😭20.649%
😈10.325%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 308reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC45 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

یه روز و این همه سوال؟ امروز زودتر از همیشه بیدار شدی. پیام پشتیبانی رو باز کردی. عضو کانال و گروه داستانک‌نویسی شدی‌. دیدی جمع خفنا جَمعه. بعید می‌دونی داستانک تو شانسی داشته باشه‌. گپ زدی با دوستات و کتاب خوندی. کتابی که خیلی دوسش داری. بوطیقای جهالت. به چندتا کتاب دیگه‌ام نوک زدی. آزادنویسی کردی و آزادپرسی. هربار قبل از آزادپرسی می‌گی سوالی ندارم. اما همین‌که شروع می‌کنی شوکه می‌شی از اون همه سوالی که تو مغزت وو

7👍3🍓1😈1

5 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC64 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

دیر نشه یه وقت هیچ‌گاه به یکدیگر نگفتیم دوستت دارم. غرور بود یا یاد نگرفته بودیم ابراز علاقه را؟ نمی‌دانم. اهمیتی هم ندارد. مهم این است که فرصت داشتیم بگوییم و نگفتیم. حالا که هر دو می‌دانیم چقدر به شنیدن این جمله نیازمندیم باز هم نمی‌گوییمش. چه مرگ‌مان شده است؟ از هم دلخوریم و دلخوری‌مان مانع گفتن دوستت دارم می‌شود؟ خشم داریم از هم؟ نمی‌دانم. شاید. شاید هم اصلا زبان یکدیگر را نمی‌دانیم. تو دوستت دارم را در دلت پن

10👌1👏1

4 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC90 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

صادقانه به راستگویی شهره شد از بس که صادقانه زیست دروغ را سارا چگنی #شعر @sarachegenii

👍95👌2🍓1💘1

4 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC54 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sarzabaanPhoto

کارگاه سه‌جلسه‌ای «دستورزبانِ تصمیم» زبان، چگونه تصمیمات ما را شکل می‌دهد؟ کدام ساختارهای زبانی در فرآیند تصمیم‌گیری ما حضور دارند؟ ساختار تصمیم چیست؟ چه عواملی به جز زبان، تصمیمات ما را می‌سازند؟ چگونه اطلاعات خودمان را پیش از تصمیم بسنجیم؟ و چطور تصمیم بهتری بگیریم؟ اطلاعات کارگاه ⏰شروع از ۱۶ مرداد جمعه‌ها ساعت: ۱۹:۳۰-۱۸ (یک‌ساعت آموزش+ نیم‌ساعت تمرین و بررسی) کارگاه آنلاین در بستر اسکای‌روم ظرفیت: ۳۰ نفر

6

3 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC91 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

وقتی بهتر می‌نویسم که... وقتی بهتر می‌نویسم که غمگین باشم. زخمی باشم. دردی داشته باشم و بتوانم آن درد را به واژه تبدیل کنم. وقتی غمگینم آدم‌ترم انگار. به احساساتم دسترسی بیشتری دارم. انگار غم و اندوهم سرمایه‌‌ی نوشتن است. وقتی بهتر می‌نویسم که حالم خوش باشد. شاد و شنگول باشم. پرانرژی باشم و بخواهم آن شادی و شور و هیجانم را به واژه تبدیل کنم. انگار انرژی جمع می‌شود در من و تمنای جاری شدن دارد. وقتی بهتر می‌نویسم که

9👌1👍1

2 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC106 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

خوش‌شانس کی بودم من؟ نشسته‌ام به فهرست کردن شانس‌های زندگی‌ام. که یادآوری کنم به خودم زندگی سراسر رنج نیست. چرا که ذهن خاطرات تلخ و ناکامی‌ها را برجسته و از کنار اتفاقات مثبت به راحتی عبور می‌کند. پس می‌نویسم که به سلامت روانم کمک کنم. برای نوشتن این فهرست باید برگردم به قبل از تولدم. به شبی که در تکاپوی «بودن» بودم. شانس با من یار بود و تلاشم نتیجه داد. خوش‌شانس بودم که پدر و مادرم از تلاش من ناراحت نشدند و اجازه

😍84👏3👌1💘1

1 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC163 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

عادت‌سازی و انعطاف‌پذیری و این صوبتا صبح وسایل امیررضا را جمع کردم و فرستادمش خانه‌ی مادربزرگش. از وقتی آمده است هر روز کودک بودن را تجربه می‌کنم. بازی می‌کنیم و کارتون می‌بینیم. هر چند کارتون‌هایی که او می‌بیند واقعا دوست‌داشتنی نیستند. سری به کانالم زدم و داستانک‌هایی را که قبلا نوشته بودم دوباره خواندم. حالا که با فاصله می‌خوانمشان می‌بینم که بدک هم نبوده‌اند. اما نمی‌دانم چرا زمانی که می‌نوشتم‌شان اصلا دوست‌شان

5👏5👍1

31 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC146 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تنهایی بلوطی‌ست ریشه‌اش در سنگ تنهایی‌ام سارا چگنی #شعر @sarachegenii

10💘2🍓1👌1👏1

30 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC170 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

هنوز مچ‌گیری را فراموش نکرده امروز هم زودتر از همیشه بیدار می‌شود و خوشحال است که دیروز تمام شده. دیروزی که خیلی بد بود. آنقدر بد که دیشب خیال می‌کرد دیگر صبح را نمی‌بیند. فکر می‌کند. به روزهای اخیرش. تا بیابد علت حال‌بدی‌هایش را. می‌داند علت چیست. اما می‌خواهد همه را گردن تغییرات هورمونی‌ بیندازد. هر چند که آن هم بی‌تاثیر نبوده است. میان فکر کردن‌هایش متوجه می‌شود دستش دیگر درد نمی‌کند. مدتی با او مدارا کرده‌ است

9👏3😍3👌2💘1

29 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTC136 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تندتر بیشتر بهتر —بی‌خوابی. خستگی. نوسان هورمونی. گرما. صفحات صبحگاهی. —جمع کردن لباس. تمرین آواز. صدای سینه. صدای حنجره. صدای سر. به سکوت سرد زمان. روزی که از تو جدا شم. گل گلدون من. —مطالعه. کمال‌گرایی. مکرر توی سرم. شعارش: تندتر. بیشتر. بهتر. دستاورد. احساس ارزشمندی. —منفورترین کار دنیا. سبزی پاک کردن. —آزادنویسی. یادداشت نصفه‌نیمه. کون محترم. شعر موزون. کتابچه. تندتر. بیشتر. بهتر. —نویسنده‌ساز. داستان کوتاه

💘53👌1

28 Jul 2026, 18:46 UTC187 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

زبا‌ن‌باز تخم کفتر که خورد زبان‌باز شد. سارا چگنی #کاریکلماتور @sarachegenii

9😁7👍3🍓1💘1

27 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC206 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

نبودنت دماوندی‌ست نشسته روی قلبم غم نبودنت سارا چگنی #شعر @sarachegenii

14😍4👌2💘2😭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sarachegenii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 507,857 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کنج عزلت | سارا چگنی” (@sarachegenii), 358 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sarachegenii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.