Channel
@resistance17
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
381subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003354619679 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @resistance17 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 21 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/resistance17 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 381 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 381 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
710 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 314 | 44.2% | |
| 👍 | 223 | 31.4% | |
| 😈 | 91 | 12.8% | |
| 🤝 | 74 | 10.4% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 1.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 710reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
проблемы virtual lp сегодня начался какой-то шквал проблем с токеном 5TON который был запущен на virtual lp (к слову, к которому мы не имеем никакого отношения). одно из вопросов был "как у биржи оказалось 10% саплая в виде комиссий в пуле с комиссиями в 1%". должен признать мне тоже стало интересно как так вышло. но прежде чем мы к этому перейдем к этому, давайте разберем как работают обмены в Classic-пулах DeDust'…
👍23😈9🤝6
как же заебали «инновационные токены» которые меняют количество токенов на лету если при отправке токена приходит количество отличное от отправленного (отправили 100, а получателю пришло 80), то этот токен - говна кусок как бы инновационно это не преподносили и что за логика не была бы под капотом («комиссии» или, боже упаси, бондинг керв). с такими поделками слиппейдж, трекинг объемов, расчет PnL и куча других вещ…
😁51👍28😈6🤝4
релизнули апдейт протокола Uranus с акцетом на билдеров: https://t.me/dedust_dev/19 p.s. два калиброванных гандона поставили палец вниз, а я ведь так старался
😁38👍32🤝10👎8
потная катка
😁25😈10🤝3
будет здорово если не будут заниматься хуйней в виде запуска tgBTC, а затащат WBTC
😁23👍10🤝6😈2
кстати, нужно выпилить это дерьмо с x1k
😁9👍6🤝5
там чет разгоняют дескать колы в каких-то альфах были даны по 20 центов. я бл с нетерпением жду когда это говнище обвалится в нулину (учитывая способности олигофренов стоящих за этим продуктом) NFA, DYOR, ACAB, FWB, вся хуйня
😁23🤝7😈5
Вот пример референсного[1] контракта, который был написан 4 года назад (тогда не было нормального инструмента) и не обновлялся: https://github.com/ton-blockchain/token-contract/blob/main/ft/jetton-discovery.fc#L3-L5 [1] Не люблю слово "официальный", потому что это хитрое слово, как правило, заставляет воспринимать любой шлак как что-то очень высококачественное. При этом "неофициальный" воспринимается как что-то тре…
😁16👍10😈4🤝3
Вот то, что стоимость сетевых комисиий снижена - это очень хорошо. Но тут важно понимать что это не дает вам возможности прикладывать сильно меньше TON чем раньше (например, 0.005 TON). Да, возвращаться будет больше, но прикладывать нужно как и раньше. Условно, вы прикладываете 0.25 TON, а возвращается 0.245 TON. То что 98% суммы возвращается обратно (или то что мы прикладываем в 30-50 раз больше чем нужно) может зв…
👍25😁20🤝6😈1
🔒 1 TON = $1.49 UPD: NFA, DYOR UPD #2: $1.50 было бы красивее, но ММ не дожал
😁22👍3😈2
Thank you for your attention to this matter and GOD BLESS TON!
😁22👍10🤝4
Глядя на изобилие критики, иронии и сарказма в этом канале, на первый взгляд может показаться что я якобы какой-то хейтер TON’а. На самом деле это отнюдь не так. Когда тебе не всё равно - сложно молчать глядя как один менеджмент без релевантных компетенций, лавиной сомнительных решений и раздутым штатом (можно было шутить «сколько членов TF нужно чтобы вкрутить лампочку? 21, для того чтобы …»), сменяется на новый м…
👍31🤝12😈7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @resistance17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 118,963 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“nick@dedust:~$” (@resistance17), 381 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/resistance17.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.