5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,245–8,437 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 16:08
8,415
+53
13 Aug 2026, 07:25
8,362
+80
10 Aug 2026, 14:38
8,282
+8
7 Aug 2026, 16:00
8,274
+7
7 Aug 2026, 08:02
8,267
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.4%
avg views ÷ 8,415 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,060
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
22 (25 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
67,423
Reactions total
3,082
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
1m 31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,082 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
914
29.7%
custom 5328152083126318935
584
18.9%
❤🔥
538
17.5%
custom 5256164643084182148
365
11.8%
😁
257
8.34%
custom 5256223398236791592
216
7.01%
🙏
164
5.32%
custom 5249189087914501688
44
1.43%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,082reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 22 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @razreshisebe_sebya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
4.55%
1 of 22 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,270
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,360
over 21 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqwy6u3Q
1
31 July 2026
31 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🖤 Началось, что ли?
Сегодня проснулась в четыре утра от того, что падла-роботша, которая Алиса, что-то шептала и мигала в темноте.
Сказать, что я обосралась, а следом и Стёпа, не сказать ничего. Началось, что ли? подумала я. То, чего я больше всего на свете боюсь. Восстание машин. Причём начать они решили почему-то с моей спальни. Извинитесь, блин!
Лежу, смотрю на неё и спрашиваю: ты там с кем, блять, шепчешься? М…
Всегда удивляют женщины, которые на вопрос «откуда это шикарное платье?» кокетливо отмахиваются. Я наоборот, рада делиться хорошим, когда спрашивают.
А лучшим — даже когда не спрашивают. Поэтому делюсь с вами этими крутейшими женскими постами:
Охлаждающие гели для ног от отечности и усталости
Как планировать свой месяц по циклу: тело, настроение и энергия
Средства для укрощения пушистых и пористых волос на любой …
🤩 «Мужчину надо удивлять!»
Приходит ваш партнёр с работы, а вы ему колено прострелили «лебединое озеро» исполнили.
Потому что отношения без сюрпризов долго не живут.
Я пять лет назад вышла из тяжелых отношений, в которых была почти десять лет. И одно из самых крутых последствий этого опыта: я стала довольно бесполезной женщиной, по патриархальным меркам.
Раньше я была женщина-мультитул. Всё понять. Простить. Подд…
Девочкам дарю шикарный букет!
Я обожаю цветы и особенно обожаю цветы от Mate, с которыми я по любви уже 4 года! А мне шоб угодить и полюбиться это, знаете ли, задача со звёздочкой.
Ну во-первых, вы гляньте какое это эстетство! Ребята спросили каким букетом меня порадовать, я им назвала палитру и несколько цветов, которые хочу, чтобы в нем были и вуаля! Феи собрали мне этот и тут же отправили эльфами.
Во-вторых, я х…
📞 Ну что, новенькие. Вас тут прибавилось. Давайте знакомиться.
Я Алёна. Психолог, 12 лет работаю с людьми, преимущественно с женщинами. Ещё я маркетолог. А ещё человек, который пережил клиническую смерть, тяжёлую клиническую депрессию, зависимость от вещ-в и алкоголя, десять лет абьюзивных отношений и девяностые.
Родилась в маленьком селе на севере Казахстана, где до цивилизации было 200 км, без нормальной дороги. …
🌞 8 удивительных фактов о нашей психике, которые многое о нас объясняют
Я часто читаю исследования и думаю: господи, какой же всё-таки невероятный кусок мяса мы носим в черепной коробке.
Собрала любимое:
1. Если назвать эмоцию словами, её интенсивность может снизиться.
То самое «мне страшно / я злюсь / мне больно» не просто психологическая болтовня. Исследования связывают называние эмоций со снижением реакции минд…
🫦 Страдающая женщина = хорошая женщина?
Щас у многих сгорят жопы, но! Мы ещё долго будем молчать о том, что заёбанная женщина считается нормой, а счастливая и расслабленная до сих пор вызывает вопросы?
Женщина с синяками под глазами, развешивающая бельё в 22:40, параллельно отвечает по работе, завтра в семь встаёт, тащит быт, дом, детей, отношения, а на вопрос «как ты?» автоматом отвечает «нормально», никого особен…
Топ бесячих фраз #1: такая красивая и до сих пор одна?!
Ну попробуй найди надёжного мужчину для отношений. Это ж тот ещё квест нынче.
Одна из настоящих причин почему ты до сих пор одна. Спойлер: на это сразу и не подумаешь. Обсудим?
Ира, автор блога о свиданиях и отношениях много рассказывает о том, как сама обжигалась пока искала свою любовь. Сейчас счастлива, живёт с мужем у океана. Я тоже хочу жить у океана!
В…
🍑 Главный критерий при выборе партнёра
По крайней мере, мой.
Не чувство юмора, не общие интересы, хотя для меня это важно, и не то, как человек выглядит рядом со мной. И даже не то, насколько сильно мы влюблены друг в друга.
Я всё чаще думаю совсем о другом.
Если однажды моя жизнь пойдёт по пизде. Если я сильно заболею. Если мне понадобится, чтобы кто-то помог помыть мне голову.
Или если этот человек будет сидет…
🍪 Скажите честно. У вас тоже в детстве была эта…
абсолютно нормальная игра?
Представить, что ты умеrла. И вот теперь они стоят на твоих похоронах. Мама плачет. Папа плачет. Воспитательница из детского сада плачет. Учительница тоже. И обязательно кто-нибудь говорит: «Она была такой хорошей девочкой…»
А ты лежишь такая и мысленно: «Ну что? Дошло теперь?»
И тут учительница ещё выдаёт:
— Блин… зачем же я придиралась…
Мы можем быть очень успешными в работе, разбираться в людях, много читать, заниматься саморазвитием…
И при этом наступать на одни и те же грабли, в отношениях в том числе.
В какой-то момент понимаешь: дело не всегда в другом человеке. Иногда мы просто сами не знаем себя так хорошо, как нам кажется.
Ольга Осипова у себя подробно разбирает тему отношений немного под другим углом.
Мне нравится, что она говорит не то…
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @razreshisebe_sebya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 204,600 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“разреши уже себе” (@razreshisebe_sebya), 8,415 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/razreshisebe_sebya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
