Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

РЭП СМИ

@rapsmi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

58,798subscribers

-101 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001815660370
TypeChannel
Username@rapsmi
Descriptionрассказываю актуальные новости про рэп. реклама — @rarerapp / @durianceo ‼️ РАБОТАЕМ ТОЛЬКО С ЭТИХ АККАУНТОВ РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67c5a4e539842d08bc157c7b
Created2 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rapsmi

Growth

58,79858,89958,848.57 August 2026 — 58,899 subscribers8 August 2026 — 58,889 subscribers9 August 2026 — 58,872 subscribers10 August 2026 — 58,854 subscribers11 August 2026 — 58,835 subscribers12 August 2026 — 58,798 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,783–58,914 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:2358,798-37
11 Aug 2026, 03:5858,835-19
10 Aug 2026, 02:1258,854-18
9 Aug 2026, 03:0158,872-17
8 Aug 2026, 05:3258,889-10
7 Aug 2026, 14:4758,899first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.6%
avg views ÷ 58,798 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,400
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held48 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total496,970
Reactions total15,545
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,290
Videos
5,100
Links
294

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14m 17s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15,545 reactions across 48 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,87937.8%
🤣3,17820.4%
🤡1,64210.6%
🤮7845.04%
❤‍🔥7344.72%
👍6003.86%
💩5573.58%
🥰3362.16%
🤯3172.04%
💔2611.68%
🔥2501.61%
😢1901.22%
👎1801.16%
😭1681.08%
🕊740.476%
💘670.431%
😁670.431%
👏480.309%
🖕320.206%
💋300.193%
27 further kinds1510.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,545reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 48 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rapsmi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC≈4,330 views347 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🍑 Бывшая Моргенштерна поделилась новыми фотками Норм выглядит?

💩199🤡54🤮38🥰20🔥17💋9🤣6👍1

12 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈10,300 views396 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

😨 Жена WormGanger’a выкинула их дочку из окна — после того как рэпера посадили, у неё начались нервные срывы Мнение?

🤯30924💔19😭12🤡10🕊7🤬6😢4

12 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈8,160 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎟️ Получи бесплатный инвайт на «Силу Звука: настройся на ритмы латины» — 20 августа сервис Звук проведёт специальный ивент, где знакомые треки любимых артистов прозвучат в латиноамериканских ритмах Лайн-ап: • BUSHIDO ZHO • MAYOT • BATO • пазнякс • uglystephan • GORILLA GLU, LIL NAKU • алёна швец. • NEXTIME • Крыли • fvnni (из плейлистов для фрешменов СВЕЖО) Чтобы попасть на ивент, слушайте специальный плейлист в Зв

25🔥6👍3👎2👏1

12 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈8,280 views249 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🚫 Инстасамка не бросит писать музыку на русском языке — она заявила, что это был прогрев перед её новым треком Мнение?

😢140🤡6818🤣11💩4👍3🕊3❤‍🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC≈8,910 views275 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🅰️ AARNE выпустил альбом «AA LANGUAGE» ровно 4 года назад Норм релиз?

208🔥29❤‍🔥17💩16👍2💘2👏1

11 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC≈10,800 views271 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

👀 xxxmanera про пьяную морось на улице Мнение?

221🤣30👍10🔥4👏2💘2🥰2

11 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC≈11,700 views357 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

👊 Литвин снял драку xxxmanera на улице Норм махач?

215🤣104❤‍🔥23🕊4💋3💯2🔥2😁2

11 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC≈11,800 views392 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🥀 Инстасамка заявила, что больше не вернётся в Россию и теперь будет выпускать музыку на английском языке — сейчас она перезаписывает все свои треки на английский в Дубае Мнение?

🤣286🔥35🤡3116👍10👎6🤮4👏1

11 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈11,600 views294 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

👀 Жена PHARAOH о его творчестве и строчках про сук Мнение?

234❤‍🔥27🥰19🤡6👏4🔥2🤣2

11 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈12,500 views441 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💔 Платина расстался со своей девушкой Кристиной — девушка заявила, что на данный момент она не в отношениях Мнение?

281😭95🥰24💔13🕊12👍6🤣6👏4

11 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈12,700 views379 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

👊 В сети появилось видео боя ICEGERGERT — рэпер проиграл на 53-й секунде после удушающего приёма Мнение?

🤣311🤡3322🕊6👍5👏1🗿1

10 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC≈12,400 views574 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👀 Drake ответил девушке, которая похвасталась тем, что он на неё посмотрел Ты вышла из туалета с туалетной бумагой на каблуке. Я просто думал, когда лучше тебе об этом сказать Мнение?

🤣480❤‍🔥4638😨3👍2🥰2😐2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @rapsmi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,112,894 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BUDA +
@budaog · 356,549
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
Риса за Творчество / РЗТ
@risazatvorchestvo · 161,144
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
Рифмы и Музыка
@rhymesmus · 374,142
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
Lovv66
@lovvdoublesix · 156,547
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
9mice
@the9mice · 268,398
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 August 2026
Платина
@sosamuzik300 · 315,352
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,413,480
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 August 2026
bushido zho
@bushidozho · 192,169
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 August 2026
MAYOT
@mayotofficialchannel · 205,902
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026
Scallygram
@scallymilanogram · 203,629
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РЭП СМИ” (@rapsmi), 58,798 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rapsmi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.