Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ДЛЯ НАС

@dlyanxss

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

102,329subscribers

-409 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001569361208
TypeChannel
Username@dlyanxss
Created21 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dlyanxss

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

102,329102,738102,533.56 August 2026 — 102,738 subscribers6 August 2026 — 102,687 subscribers7 August 2026 — 102,616 subscribers8 August 2026 — 102,599 subscribers9 August 2026 — 102,540 subscribers11 August 2026 — 102,482 subscribers12 August 2026 — 102,416 subscribers13 August 2026 — 102,415 subscribers14 August 2026 — 102,329 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -409. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 102,268–102,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:15102,329-86
13 Aug 2026, 04:13102,415-1
12 Aug 2026, 01:52102,416-66
11 Aug 2026, 02:56102,482-58
9 Aug 2026, 23:32102,540-59
8 Aug 2026, 20:53102,599-17
7 Aug 2026, 22:04102,616-71
6 Aug 2026, 22:00102,687-51
6 Aug 2026, 08:46102,738first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.11%
avg views ÷ 102,329 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,280
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held62 (5 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total451,160
Reactions total16,011
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 13s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,645 reactions across 54 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9,04866.3%
🤡2,66719.5%
😁6774.96%
❤‍🔥3012.21%
🔥2301.69%
🤮2261.66%
💘690.506%
🥰650.476%
💩550.403%
💋540.396%
👎430.315%
👻260.191%
230.169%
🙏220.161%
🤣190.139%
👍170.125%
💯130.095%
🤓130.095%
🫡130.095%
👏110.081%
14 further kinds530.388%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,011reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 62 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dlyanxss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC≈1,610 views96 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Кишлак и обезьяна 😎 ❤️ — они драться собираются?

94🐳2

14 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC≈3,850 views491 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Фладда ест лапшу 🍜 ❤️ — топ 🤡 — не понимаю прикола лапши

408❤‍🔥45🔥31💘5🤡2

13 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC≈5,080 views134 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤮85💩1715💔7❤‍🔥6💋2🤝2

13 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC≈5,050 views184 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Просто лол 😎 Вики Шоу, Милана Хаметова и Betsy дропнули кьют-рок трек «Парацетамол»! ❤️ — лол 😁 — парацетамол

🤮13725😁17🔥3💩1🤡1

13 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC≈6,310 views347 reactions1 Starread 14 August 2026
Video

Baby Cute катается на метро 😎 ❤️ — народный артист 🤡 — не хватило на бизнес такси

311🤡28🔥5👌2🙏1

13 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈6,710 views347 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Платина выпустил альбом «Sosa Muzik» 5 лет назад 😳 ❤️ — время летит 🤡 — не слушал

275🤡33❤‍🔥30🙏3💔2💘2👻1💩1

13 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈6,510 views19 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Уже оценили коллаб Огней и Яндекс Еды? Теперь всё что хочется есть не только в приложении На открытии заценили сразу несколько крутых опций: веранду на балконе можно забронить через раздел «Сходить» в Яндекс Еде и кайфовать с красивым видом, в пит-стоп баре Еды можно выбрать какие хочется напитки без отрыва от тусовки, а в зоне посадки под тополем комфортно разместиться и почувствовать загородный вайб прямо в Москв

19

13 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈6,440 views294 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

9mice в модных подкрадулях 🦶 ❤️ — модный 🤡 — кринж

🤡19493💘2🔥2🤮2👻1

13 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈7,170 views129 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Что выйдет сегодня в полночь? 🎧 Синглы: • ЮГ 404 — «назови меня» • жанна орешкина, семьсот семь & 17 SEVENTEEN — «как дура» • 5opka, MellSher & Вова Солодков — «ТУСА МЕДУЗА» • ENTYPE — «не твой» • Jubilee — «Черный стих» • UncleFlexxx — «Call Me» • Даня Милохин — «Мне нужна любовь» • Betsy, Viki Show & Милана Хаметова — «Парацетамол» • Ганвест — «СВЕТЛАНА» • ЕГОР ШИП — «Танцуй» • SASHA TRAUTVEIN & NIKER — «прощай,

98💩21😁4💘3🔥2👻1

13 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC≈6,620 views119 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Trippie Redd выложил трек лист альбома «NDA» который выйдет уже завтра 😈 ❤️ — ждём 🤡 — пофиг

99🤡16👻3🙏1

13 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC≈6,870 views135 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Бекстейдж со съёмок Доры для бренда одежды 👀 Судя по лукам, похоже на Ecru. ❤️ — красотка

127👻4😁4

13 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC≈7,360 views471 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Фанат Буды набил тату «Скучаю, но ещё работаю» на всю ногу 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️ ❤️ — стиль 😁 — это ужас

😁37488🔥6🤡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @dlyanxss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 04:43 UTCAnonymous Poll1,970 voters approx.

Кто забрал пятницу?

  1. Mzlff19%
  2. Scally Milano14%
  3. Акулич х Платон7%
  4. 22 раза11%
  5. KSB16%
  6. Rocket x Fresco9%
  7. Никто26%
  8. Я единолично забрал27%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 137,741 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Яндекс Музыка
@yandexmusic_live · 465,112
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 August 2026
GSPD
@gspd2000 · 148,582
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
Lida
@mudotalida · 253,539
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 August 2026
BUDA +
@budaog · 357,048
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 435,745
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 August 2026
Heronwater
@H3ronwat3r · 131,727
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
Lovv66
@lovvdoublesix · 156,536
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
Scallygram
@scallymilanogram · 203,730
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 August 2026
ванг ас фак
@wangasfuck · 129,629
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 13 August 2026
Blink — общение и друзья на карте
@blinkmap · 134,367
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
Риса за Творчество / РЗТ
@risazatvorchestvo · 161,218
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
Подвал Стинта
@thestint · 266,369
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 August 2026
Мысли Жопера | 5opka - Пятёрка
@joper5 · 177,688
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 August 2026
Рифмы и Музыка
@rhymesmus · 374,090
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
дед инсайд блонд
@deadblonde · 155,273
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
ХАЗЯЕВА В МОМЕНТЕ
@xazayeva · 365,883
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
stereoNEWS
@stereoNWS · 118,444
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 264,526
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 August 2026
T2x2
@t2xtwitch · 326,820
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 August 2026
МЭЙБИ БЭЙБИ
@maybebaby · 173,697
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
Влад Раговский
@GABARITVLAD · 203,695
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,058,599
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 August 2026
9mice
@the9mice · 268,331
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 August 2026
Логово Имморталиуса
@imms1337 · 113,082
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 52 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДЛЯ НАС” (@dlyanxss), 102,329 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dlyanxss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.