Channel
@fendiglockchannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,707subscribers
+86 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001876384275 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fendiglockchannel |
| Description | реклама, концерты 🌍 instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fendiglock1?igsh=MWZzanRhb2ExcWs0Mw%3D%3D&utm_source=qr |
| Created | 3 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fendiglockchannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 21,707 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 21,705 | +14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 21,691 | +29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 21,662 | +21 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 21,641 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 21,631 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 21,628 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 21,621 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 21,621 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
15,981 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12,379 | 77.5% | |
| 💔 | 3,602 | 22.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,981reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fendiglockchannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 September 2025 to 11 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
завтра в 20:00 стрим на твиче в формате song wars 10 участников, 10 треков, будем слушать по очереди, каждый будет проходить дальше либо выбывать кто победит в финале получит от меня новый пресет (нет ни у кого) + репост на ск для участия писать в этот инстаграм- @ fenditwitch цена входа- 4000₽ / 55$ успевайте !
❤179💔47
русский рэп
❤325💔141
апдейт- исходя из последней инфы походу даже спотик и эпл будет разъебан. потому что занимается цензурой не артист, а лейбл, которому артист передал права на треки при подписании договора и чисто юридически мы нихуя не можем сделать я слушал уже «обновленные»альбомы коллег- это ПИЗДА русский рэп R.I.P. будем думать что делать пока что хули
❤399💔129
S3X MUSIC не выйдет вместо него я анонсирую свой новый проект! FENDIGLOCK- МОРАЛЬНЫЕ ЦЕННОСТИ
❤857💔381
на платформах дерьма скоро будет одна каша вместо треков (спойлер- у всех артистов) поэтому переходите на спотик и эпл, давно пора, там все будет как раньше
❤339💔84
переходим на правильную музыку 🔥🔥🔥
❤580💔135
не хотел спойлерить до последнего, но…. я собрал морти и питкида на одном треке 😭
❤966💔242
2 трека осталось и альбом готов баляяяяя
❤657💔171
Photo, posted without a caption
❤933💔269
S3X MUSIC 80% ДОДЕЛЫВАЮ 12 ТРЕКОВ 🧘🏻♀️
❤1,040💔250
реакций ебаните если ждёте
❤1,060💔268
Video message, posted without a caption
❤838💔262
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fendiglockchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 378,246 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“fendiglock” (@fendiglockchannel), 21,707 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fendiglockchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.