Channel
@radanews1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
96,551subscribers
-554 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001238197900 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @radanews1 |
| Description | رادا نيوز | نرصد الحدث، ننقل الحقيقة، ونواكب الأخبار أولاً بأول |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/radanews1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 96,551 | -172 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 96,723 | -143 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 96,866 | -91 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 96,957 | -86 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 97,043 | -62 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 97,105 | first reading |
219 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 219 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 219 (10 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 70,157 |
| Reactions total | 64 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
64 reactions across 39 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 45.3% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 26.6% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 17.2% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 7.81% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 219 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 219 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
رئيس تركيا أردوغان حول احتمال نشوب حرب مع إسرائيل: نحن لا نتحدث عن حرب، بل نتحدث عن سلام. - ولكن إذا كان هناك من سيهاجم تركيا من أجل الحرب وليس من أجل السلام، فإن تركيا لن تتردد في خوض تلك الحرب ولن تتراجع عنها. - أقول هذا بوضوح تام وصراحة.
مساعد قائد حرس الثورة يد الله جواني: التعيينات نوع من إعادة ترتيب وجعل العقيدة الدفاعية أكثر كفاءة بما يتناسب مع الظروف
نيويورك تايمز: كوشنر يجري محادثات مع حماس لدفع خطة ترامب لغزة
رئيس البرلمان الإيراني: يجب أن نصل إلى مستوى من الردع بحيث لا نقع في دوامة الحرب ثم السلام ثم استنزاف الحرب
التايمز البريطانية: إيران تضع مكافأة قدرها 30 ألف دولار لمن يدلي بجنود أمريكيين.
كربلاء يتعادل إيجابياً مع الشرطة وأربيل يهزم الكهرباء في دوري النجوم
أكسيوس: قادة حماس أكدوا خلال اجتماع مع مستشار ترامب، في مصر التزامهم بتجريد أنفسهم من الأسلحة ونزع سلاح قطاع غزة.
👍2
قاليباف: أقول بكل صدق أننا حققنا النصر في هذه الحرب، سواء من الناحية العسكرية أو السياسية. هذا لا يعني أننا دمرنا الجيش الأمريكي. ما أقصده هو أن الولايات المتحدة وإسرائيل هاجمتنا بتسع أهداف محددة ومعلنة، لكنهما فشلتا في تحقيق أي من هذه الأهداف التسع على أي مستوى. لقد كان هذا أعظم هزيمة مطلقة للولايات المتحدة والنظام الصهيوني. وفي المجال الدبلوماسي أيضًا، فإن الاتفاق هو مصدر فخر وانتصار في ساحة المعركة الدبلوماسي…
👍1
تحليق متواصل للطيران الأميركي في أجواء العاصمة بغداد.
الرئيس الإيراني، بزشكيان: يجب أن نصل، من خلال الاستثمار في أبنائنا، إلى قدرات تجعل العدو لا يجرؤ على التعدي على أراضينا إسرائيل أفسدت منطقة الشرق الأوسط بأكملها.
النائب الأول لرئيس مجلس النواب عدنان فيحان الدليمي: البرلمان يدعم جهود هيئة الاستثمار لتعزيز دورها وتمكينها من أداء مهامها بكفاءة ويجب العمل على توفير بيئة استثمارية مستقرة وجاذبة
مشاهد قريبة لحطام صاروخ توماهوك الأمريكي.
Showing the 12 most recent of 219 posts we hold for @radanews1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 196,142 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رادا نيوز - Rada News” (@radanews1), 96,551 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/radanews1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.