Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Інсайдер ЗСУ

@insider_zsy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

1,235,888subscribers

-15,363 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001660226324
TypeChannel
Username@insider_zsy
DescriptionНайбільший військово-політичний канал України. Співпраця — @insider_zcy Посилання на канал — https://t.me/+1q_40f9MNFw5NGZi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/insider_zsy

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,235,8881,251,2511,243,569.56 August 2026 — 1,251,251 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,249,456 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,247,254 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,244,441 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,241,617 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,238,708 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,235,888 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -15,363. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,233,584–1,253,555 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:021,235,888-2,820
11 Aug 2026, 01:431,238,708-2,909
10 Aug 2026, 01:211,241,617-2,824
8 Aug 2026, 22:071,244,441-2,813
7 Aug 2026, 18:491,247,254-2,202
6 Aug 2026, 19:201,249,456-1,795
6 Aug 2026, 08:011,251,251first reading

Engagement

144 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 1,235,888 subscribers
Avg views / post
166,000
144 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
144
of 144 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held144 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total23,937,500
Reactions total406,331
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
19,100
Videos
14,100
Links
35,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
33m 48s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

Computed from 130 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 99of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3.9 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 21.9% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 67.4% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 167,000 views13.5% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 182,100).

8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/4522212 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC1027 minutes4.9 hours old74,800 views ~2,531 reactions60 minutes: 36,6003.0 hours: 63,230 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h62 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/4522112 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC124 minutes6.2 hours old98,000 views ~1,199 reactions60 minutes: 33,990 interp.3.0 hours: 73,1006.0 hours: 98,000still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/4522012 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC1216 minutes6.4 hours old97,300 views ~1,881 reactions60 minutes: 35,829 interp.3.0 hours: 70,6006.0 hours: 93,900still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/4521812 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC132 minutes6.7 hours old81,800 views ~1,047 reactions60 minutes: 37,393 interp.3.0 hours: 67,653 interp.6.0 hours: 80,200still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h70 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/4521712 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC1330 minutes7.2 hours old103,000 views ~2,263 reactions60 minutes: 44,9003.0 hours: 84,248 interp.6.0 hours: 101,000still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h78 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/4521612 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC1416 minutes7.5 hours old102,000 views ~644 reactions60 minutes: 39,463 interp.3.0 hours: 81,5006.0 hours: 99,600still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h81 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/4521512 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC1429 minutes7.7 hours old102,000 views ~2,022 reactions60 minutes: 38,131 interp.3.0 hours: 77,747 interp.6.0 hours: 98,900still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h90 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/4521412 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC1516 minutes8.1 hours old105,000 views ~242 reactions60 minutes: 34,672 interp.3.0 hours: 77,1006.0 hours: 101,000still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Reaction mix

393,898 reactions across 139 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬103,09026.2%
🔥69,06317.5%
👍58,52914.9%
🙏49,56112.6%
46,04311.7%
🤡30,6457.78%
😢14,9493.80%
😁9,6042.44%
😱4,8391.23%
🤯2,8740.73%
👏2,8690.728%
👎1,3640.346%
😍4680.119%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 144 of the 144 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 406,331reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 144 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @insider_zsy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 144 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.694%
1 of 144 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
105,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
176,000
over 143 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC≈74,800 views2,531 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Оновлена мапа бойових дій від DeepState ЗСУ звільнили Зелений Гай, Новохатське, Грушівське, Толстой, Зірку, Ялту, Піддубне, Мирне, Воскресенку, Січневе, Воронне, Тернове, Березове, Степове, Калинівське, Привілля, Злагоду, Рибне та Красногірське. Інсайдер ЗСУ

🙏1,750484👍204🔥51🤡32👎10

12 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈98,000 views1,199 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

📌А так виглядає сонячне затемнення в Ісландії Тут, а також на півночі Іспанії, найкраще видно повну фазу. Інсайдер ЗСУ

784😍185🔥80🙏74👍59👏17

12 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC≈97,300 views1,881 reactionsread 13 August 2026

❗️Україна визначила нові цілі для далекобійних ударів по рф: готуємо подальше застосування далекобійної та середньодальньої зброї, — Зеленський Інсайдер ЗСУ

1,000👍494🙏157🤡131🔥86👏13

12 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈81,800 views1,047 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Над Україною видно сонячне затемнення Найвиразніше його спостерігали в Ужгороді, там Місяць закрив 43,44% сонячного диска. Інсайдер ЗСУ

720🙏148😍103👍56👎12😁8

12 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈103,000 views2,263 reactionsread 13 August 2026

⚡️Уночі уражено чотири військові кораблі ворога у Новоросійську За попередньою інформацією, пошкоджень різного ступеню зазнали: ▪️два фрегата проєкту 11356, «Адмірал Макаров» та «Адмірал Ессен»; ▪️малий ракетний корабель проєкту 21631 «Буян-М»; ▪️сторожовий корабель проєкту 22160 «Василь Биков». Інсайдер ЗСУ

🔥1,690👍394156🤯10🤬9👎4

12 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈102,000 views644 reactionsread 13 August 2026

❗️Це просто боляче бачити. Пост побачили тисячі людей, а підтримали — одиниці. А там, за сотні кілометрів, хлопці щодня ризикують своїм життям заради всіх нас. Невже ми не зможемо зібрати хоча б по кілька гривень? Для когось це чашка кави. Для них — шанс вижити і якісно виконувати завдання. МоноБанка: https://send.monobank.ua/jar/ANcA7Dcgx1 (4874100031133716) Приват24: https://www.privat24.ua/send/drxcq (414949

🙏491106👎19🤡19🤬8👏1

12 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈102,000 views2,022 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

❗️путін не хоче зупиняти цю війну, але він її зупинить, — Зеленський під час Українського молодіжного форуму Глава держави зазначив, що Україна спільно з партнерами має план щодо того, як чинити тиск на путіна. Інсайдер ЗСУ

🤡860🙏812👍187🤬6259😁42

12 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈105,000 views242 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

❗️Лише сьогодні дивись Суперкубок УЄФА безкоштовно! Справжня футбольна заруба, про яку говоритиме кожен, не пропусти безкоштовну трансляцію: 🏆 ПСЖ - АСТОН ВІЛЛА — сьогодні о 22:00! ☝🏻Готовий бонус на цей фінал вже опубліковано! ✅ Регулярні трансляції топових матчів, залишайся з нами, щоб нічого не пропустити. Обирай «трансляція матчу» та подавай запит нижче👇 #реклама

168🤡33🤯13🙏13👎11😍4

12 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC≈106,000 views1,619 reactionsread 13 August 2026

❗️Чехія почала відмовляти військовозобов’язаним українцям у тимчасовому захисті: за тиждень десятки відмов Ці люди не змогли підтвердити виконання військового обов’язку. Нововведення стосуються не лише нових заявників, але і тих, хто продовжує статус. Інсайдер ЗСУ

👍1,280🤬21265🤯39👎16🔥7

12 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈110,000 views1,664 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🚀Підвищена загроза балістичної атаки по Києву та області протягом найближчих двох діб русня може застосувати близько 30 балістичних та гіперзвукових ракет: «Іскандер-М», ракет до С-400, KN-23 та «Циркон». Інсайдер ЗСУ

🤬1,180🙏431👍16🤯14😁12🤡11

12 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈111,000 views625 reactionsread 13 August 2026

❗️Цей збір пів дня стоїть на місці.. Для когось це просто цифра на екрані. А для когось — шанс дочекатися ранку, шанс повернутися до рідних, шанс жити. Не проходьте повз, будь ласка Кожна гривня — це не «занадто мало». Найстрашніше — не допомогти зовсім. МоноБанка: https://send.monobank.ua/jar/ANcA7Dcgx1 (4874100031133716) Приват24: https://www.privat24.ua/send/drxcq (4149497500937893) PayPal: nrs_volunteer@ukr

🙏48092🤡25👎17👍8😁3

12 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC≈82,800 views2,705 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🔥Горить склад у Краснодарі, перед тим місцеві чули вибух Інсайдер ЗСУ

🔥2,060👍457114👏36🤡23🙏15

Showing the 12 most recent of 144 posts we hold for @insider_zsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@insider_zsy edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 456,878 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

3 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

www.facebook.comregistrable domain: facebook.com2 posts · 6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
24tv.ua1 post · 6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post
www.youtube.comregistrable domain: youtube.com1 post · 5 August 2026 – 5 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Інсайдер ЗСУ” (@insider_zsy), 1,235,888 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insider_zsy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.