Channel
@pmalliance_ru
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,060subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001487720948 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pmalliance_ru |
| Created | 6 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pmalliance_ru |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 1,060 | +15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 1,045 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 1,050 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 1,050 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,981 |
| Reactions total | 112 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
112 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 37 | 33.0% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 16.1% | |
| ✍ | 12 | 10.7% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 9.82% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 7.14% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 5.36% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 4.46% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 4.46% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 3.57% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.79% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.79% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💥 Запись вебинара «Почему в мегапроектах не срабатывают даже правильные решения: социокультурные факторы принятия решений» будет опубликована на платформах VK Видео и VK Музыка в видео- и аудио- форматах. Обязательно подписывайтесь и следите за обновлениями! @projectpointru
👌3
💥 Присоединяйтесь к вебинару сегодня в 12:00! Требуется предварительная регистрация👇 @pmalliance_ru
🔥3
⚡️ Как создать зелёный офис — и не потерять хорошую идею на этапе реализации 21 августа в Москве пройдёт бесплатная образовательная конференция «Зелёная недвижимость: пространства будущего». Она объединит девелоперов, управляющие компании, корпоративных заказчиков, ESG-специалистов и экспертов по устойчивому управлению. Участвовать можно очно на ВДНХ или онлайн. В программе — экономика зелёной недвижимости, национа…
👍4❤1🔥1
🚨 Завтра — вебинар «Формулы проекта» о мегапроектах Мегапроект — это не просто большой проект. Это система, в которой одно решение проходит через разные управленческие языки 👇 Для заказчика оно может быть стратегическим выбором, для проектного офиса — контуром ответственности, для подрядчика — новым ограничением, для команды — изменением приоритетов, для стейкхолдеров — сигналом о перераспределении влияния. Именно…
👌2👍2❤1
File, posted without a caption
👀2👍2🔥2
❓ Казахстан с 2027 года планирует не просто закрыть свои потребности в электроэнергии, а выйти в устойчивый профицит мощностей. На что уйдут лишние гигаватты? ❓ Почему Всемирный банк направляет еще $300 млн на строительство Рогунской ГЭС, и как проект изменит энергосистему Центральной Азии? ❓ Как первые в России ЦФА на восстановление лесов превращают инвестиции в реальные экологические проекты? 😀 Ответы — в июльском…
План есть. Совещания идут. Проект буксует! Знакомая ситуация? Часто дело не в том, что план плохой. А в том, что решения внутри проекта живут отдельной жизнью. Их согласовали, но поняли по-разному. Приняли, но не превратили в действие. Зафиксировали, но ответственность всё равно осталась размытой. В канале «Формула проекта» мы начали коротко разбирать именно такие ситуации: когда проект формально движется, но факти…
👍5
🚨 Уже 6 августа! Вебинар, который стоит поставить в календарь прямо сейчас В мегапроектах проваливаются не только плохие решения. Иногда проваливаются правильные. Потому что одно и то же решение в большом проекте могут по-разному понять заказчик, подрядчики, проектный офис, команда, партнёры и внешние стейкхолдеры. На бумаге всё логично. В реальности — разные культуры, разная ответственность, разные интересы, разн…
👍3👏3
Каждый четвёртый сотрудник уверен, что справился бы с работой начальника лучше Так считают 26% работающих россиян. Ещё 17% хотели бы занять должность руководителя ради более высокой зарплаты, но не ради управленческих обязанностей, следует из исследования Teachbase. Некомпетентным своего начальника считают 33% опрошенных: 24% уверены, что он не соответствует должности, ещё 9% называют его совершенно неподходящим дл…
✍2👍2🤝2
⚡️ Проект ещё можно заявить. Главное — не откладывать до сентября Предварительный этап направления «Проекты» завершён, но конкурсный сезон продолжается. Согласно Положению Национального конкурса «Формула устойчивых проектов», до 6 сентября 2026 года принимаются конкурсные материалы — заявка и отчёт по проекту. Именно отчёт становится основой профессиональной оценки. В нём команда показывает не только достигнутый р…
❤3🔥3
«Полюс» публикует Отчет об устойчивом развитии за 2025 год Следуя Целям устойчивого развития ООН, «Полюс» выстраивает свою деятельность с учетом глобальных и национальных приоритетов. Компания вносит вклад в достижение национальных целей развития России, реализуя проекты, направленные на развитие экономики, социальной сферы, науки и технологий, повышение экологической устойчивости и качества жизни в регионах своей д…
👍3💯2👀1
💥 В мегапроектах бывает парадоксальная ситуация: решение принято, зафиксировано, согласовано — но на практике не срабатывает Не потому, что оно обязательно ошибочное, а потому что между решением «на бумаге» и решением «в действии» есть сложный слой: культура, доверие, неформальные правила, разные управленческие привычки, отношение к ответственности, срокам, рискам и иерархии. 6 августа в 12:00 (МСК) проведём новый …
✍4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pmalliance_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 72,047 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПРОЕКТНЫЙ АЛЬЯНС” (@pmalliance_ru), 1,060 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pmalliance_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.