Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПОДТЯЖКА ЛИЦА | БЛЕФАРОПЛАСТИКА в Подольске | Soleil Clinic

Channel

ПОДТЯЖКА ЛИЦА | БЛЕФАРОПЛАСТИКА в Подольске | Soleil Clinic

@plastic_soleil

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,668subscribers

+965 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001745992512
TypeChannel
Username@plastic_soleil
Description💠Клиника Пластической Хирургии ⚜️Все виды пластических операций лица и тела 🌐Экспертный уровень оказания медицинских услуг 🔥Акции ☎️ Запись на консультации по телефону +7(499)343-30-09
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/plastic_soleil

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@doctor_demin/70298 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC@plastic_soleil/6885 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@plastic_soleil/6859 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 12:37 UTC@doctor_demin/70025 Nov 2026, 12:37 UTC0.96under a minute
@doctor_demin/70298 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC@plastic_soleil/6906 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC0.963 days
@doctor_demin/70359 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC@plastic_soleil/6891 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC0.96under a minute
@doctor_demin/69964 Nov 2026, 15:10 UTC@plastic_soleil/6853 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 15:11 UTC0.95under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@doctor_demin5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.97under a minute@doctor_demin (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 3 of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 82 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,66510,4639,5646 August 2026 — 8,703 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,671 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,911 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,165 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,604 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,720 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,752 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,772 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,761 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,711 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,422 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,382 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,903 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,811 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,665 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,690 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,361 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,444 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,520 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,311 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,472 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,438 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,316 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,463 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,164 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,136 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,910 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,884 subscribers9 November 2026 — 9,668 subscribers9,6686 August 20269 November 2026
29 measurements spanning 95 days, net +965. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,395–10,733 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 08:469,668-216
6 Nov 2026, 06:579,884-26
3 Nov 2026, 07:049,910-226
2 Nov 2026, 06:4510,136-28
1 Nov 2026, 05:5810,164-299
31 Oct 2026, 02:4810,463+147
29 Oct 2026, 23:5710,316+878
26 Oct 2026, 13:559,438-34
23 Oct 2026, 09:449,472+161
20 Oct 2026, 09:519,311-209
17 Oct 2026, 07:509,520+76
14 Oct 2026, 09:019,444+83
11 Oct 2026, 00:429,361-329
5 Oct 2026, 02:399,690+1,025
26 Sept 2026, 09:018,665-146
17 Sept 2026, 08:008,811-92
13 Sept 2026, 17:378,903-479
9 Sept 2026, 13:189,382-40
4 Sept 2026, 02:159,422-289
1 Sept 2026, 02:359,711first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.19%
avg views ÷ 9,668 subscribers
Avg views / post
212
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held83 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total6,577
Reactions total418
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 11:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,070
Videos
≈140
Links
≈567

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,485 reactions across 82 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤36524.6%
👍29319.7%
🔥23415.8%
👏16311.0%
🤩1006.73%
💯895.99%
❤‍🔥855.72%
🥰855.72%
😍674.51%
👌40.269%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,485 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC176 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

💙 На фото наша прекрасная пациентка, которой была выполнена круговая блефаропластика (пластика верхних и нижних век): 1⃣ резекция тканей верхних век; 2⃣ жиросохраняющая блефаропластика нижних век с перераспределением жировых пакетов в места дефицита тканей. Данная техника проведения операций является самой бережной, дающей максимально возможно-привлекательный результат и комфортную реабилитацию. ⏺ Проводится опера…

11 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC178 views57 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🖇 На фото наша прекрасная пациентка, которой было выполнено эндоскопическое периорбитальное омоложение (с подтяжкой средней трети лица и блефаропластикой верхних и нижних век в жиросберегающей технике). ⏺ Проводится операция под общей анестезией. ⏺ Снятие швов и стрипов на 7 сутки после операции. ⏺ На работу выходите на 7-ой день без склеек на веках. ☺️ Стоимость эндоскопического периорбитального омоложения от 350 …

🤩22👍17🥰16❤2

11 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Блефаропластика ТОЛЬКО верхних век по запросу пациентки. ✅Является достаточно распространённой операцией, особенно даже у пациентов младшего и среднего возраста. ✅ Суть данной операции заключается в удалении излишков кожи верхних век, а так же, при необходимости, частичном удалении гипертрофированных (увеличенных) жировых тел верхних век. ☺️ Блефаропластику верхних век проводят, как под местной, так и под общей ан…

❤1

11 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

РАННИЙ ЭТАП РЕАБИЛИТАЦИИ. ПОКА ЕЩЕ НАБЛЮДАЕТСЯ ГИПЕРКОРРЕКЦИЯ. На фото наша прекрасная пациентка, которой были выполнены: 1⃣ блефаропластика верхних век и жиросохраняющая 2⃣ блефаропластика нижних век с перераспределением жировых пакетов в места дефицита тканей; эндоскопическая подтяжка висков с целью коррекции SOOF (моляры) и омоложения периорбитальной зоны. ⏺ Проводится операция под общей анестезией. ⏺ Выход на…

❤1

10 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC349 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Сочетанная блефаропластика верхних и нижних век. Является достаточно распространённой операцией, особенно у пациентов среднего и старшего возраста. ↗ Суть данной операции заключается в удалении излишков кожи верхних и нижних век, а так же, при необходимости, частичном удалении гипертрофированных (увеличенных) жировых тел нижних век или их перемещении (жиросохраняющая техника с перераспределением). ✅Стоимость сочета…

❤3

10 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC178 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🔁 На фото наша прекрасная пациентка, которой были выполнены: ☺️блефаропластика верхних век; ☺️эндоскопическая подтяжка верхней трети лица. ⏺ Проводится операция под общей анестезией. Выход на работу через 7 дней после операции без швов и склеек. ✅Блефаропластика верхних век + Эндоскопическая подтяжка верхней трети лица 280'000 руб. ☺️Запись на консультацию через Max и WA: +7(926) 223-33-37 (☺️ просьба писать с 1…

❤2

10 Nov 2026, 09:11 UTC334 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

☺️ На фото наша прекрасная пациентка после выполненной расширенной блефаропластики нижних век. Является достаточно распространённой операцией, особенно у пациентов среднего и старшего возраста. ⏺ Суть данной операции заключается в удалении излишков кожи нижних век, а так же в частичной резекции и/или перемещении жировых грыж нижних век в места дефицита тканей. 🖇 Стоимость классической (резекционной) блефаропластик…

❤3

9 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC656 views56 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🔁 На фото наша прекрасная пациентка, которой было выполнено периорбитальное омоложение. В ходе операции было выполнено: 1⃣ расширенная блефаропластика нижних век; 2⃣ эндоскопическая подтяжка верхней трети лица для омоложения взгляда. ✅Данная техника проведения операций является самой бережной, дающей максимально возможно-привлекательный результат и комфортную реабилитацию. ⏺ Проводится операция под общей или местн…

❤‍🔥22👍19🥰10❤3👌2

9 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC46 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

☺️ На фото наша прекрасная пациентка, которой была выполнена эндоскопическая подтяжка верхней трети лица (фронтотемпоральный лифтинг) для омоложения. ⏺ Проводится операция под общей анестезией ⏺ На работу выходите через 7 дней без склеек. ✅ Эндоскопический лифтинг верхней трети лица 200'000 руб. ☺️Запись на консультацию через Max и WA: +7(926) 223-33-37 (☺️ просьба писать с 11:00 до 21:00, отвечает мой врач-ассис…

❤3

9 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

☺️ Сочетанная блефаропластика верхних и нижних век. Является достаточно распространённой операцией, особенно у пациентов среднего и старшего возраста. 🔁 Суть данной операции заключается в удалении излишков кожи верхних и нижних век, а так же, при необходимости, частичном удалении гипертрофированных (увеличенных) жировых тел нижних век или их перемещении (жиросохраняющая техника с перераспределением). ✅Стоимость соч…

❤1

8 Nov 2026, 15:19 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔁 На фото наша прекрасная пациентка, которой была выполнена эндоскопическая подтяжка висков с целью коррекции SOOF (моляры) и омоложения периорбитальной зоны. ⏺ Проводится операция под общей анестезией. ⏺ Выход на работу через 7 дней без швов и склеек на веках. ↗ Эндоскопическая подтяжка висков (темпоральный лифтинг) 200'000 руб. ☺️Запись на консультацию через Max и WA: +7(926) 223-33-37 (☺️ просьба писать с 11:0…

❤1

8 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔁 Блефаропластика ТОЛЬКО верхних век по запросу пациентки. ✅Является достаточно распространённой операцией, особенно даже у пациентов младшего и среднего возраста. 🔎 Суть данной операции заключается в удалении излишков кожи верхних век, а так же, при необходимости, частичном удалении гипертрофированных (увеличенных) жировых тел верхних век. 💙 Блефаропластику верхних век проводят, как под местной, так и под общей а…

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @plastic_soleil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Юлия Лашкова - mom"s blog❤️
@pro_pravo_lashkova · 25,506
12 posts
Helenoki AESTHETIC
@helenoki · 10,093
10 posts
SvetikSVD
@svetiksvd_life · 19,004
6 posts
Жанна и компания
@life_to_me_life · 33,812
4 posts
Хочу халву ем, хочу не ем
@sea_see_you_live · 43,569
4 posts
Chudomax
@chudilovaa · 24,979
3 posts
first_viktoria_nikolaeva
@first_victoria_nikolaeva · 11,725
3 posts
Дожить до завтрака
@nutriannashis · 21,277
3 posts
Клуб психологии, Оксаны Васильевой
@psydolls · 15,448
3 posts
@sem_sona
@in_love_with_family · 85,726
2 posts
Нутрициолог💊Дача🏠 Ремонт ⚒️ Рецепты 👩‍🍳 Юмор 😆
@julmetova · 33,775
2 posts
КРИСТИ 👑
@KristiNilova · 19,157
2 posts
Семья. Дети. Рецепты. Путешествия.
@mama_prosto · 73,234
2 posts
Всё о красоте и уюте дома
@natali_original20 · 50,933
2 posts
LIFE ОБЗОРЫ МОСКВА
@natalya_obzor_moscow · 91,404
2 posts
Ryabichenko life
@olga_ryabichenko · 39,448
2 posts
Не только брокколи
@olushka171180 · 68,236
2 posts
Женственность в декрете
@reginaitova · 22,804
2 posts
Мама. Семья . Дети. Путешествия.
@sem_sonafamily · 71,643
2 posts
Посекретничаем с SlavAlenka
@slavalenka_diary · 5,698
2 posts
ya_toeva
@ya_toeva · 18,926
2 posts
С любовью к каждой детали
@evgeniya_es_offical · 21,144
1 post
жизнь ᴋᴀᴋ ᴄᴛоᴩиᴛᴇᴧᴧинᴦ
@marina_shestak · 44,018
1 post
Vik.wik по секрету
@vik_wik_mom · 9,651
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПОДТЯЖКА ЛИЦА | БЛЕФАРОПЛАСТИКА в Подольске | Soleil Clinic” (@plastic_soleil), 9,668 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plastic_soleil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.