11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,094–10,152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 18:34
10,145
+9
15 Aug 2026, 06:09
10,136
+9
14 Aug 2026, 01:15
10,127
-1
12 Aug 2026, 17:34
10,128
+3
11 Aug 2026, 15:03
10,125
+7
10 Aug 2026, 11:53
10,118
-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:31
10,119
+4
8 Aug 2026, 14:20
10,115
+4
7 Aug 2026, 11:57
10,111
+9
6 Aug 2026, 10:40
10,102
+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:06
10,101
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 10,145 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 60 of 62 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
62 (3 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
73,189
Reactions total
1,185
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 39m
Average length
4m 19s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,167 reactions across 58 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
419
35.9%
🤬
336
28.8%
🔥
140
12.0%
❤
82
7.03%
👍
48
4.11%
😭
34
2.91%
👎
26
2.23%
🤯
23
1.97%
😡
18
1.54%
😨
15
1.29%
😢
13
1.11%
👀
12
1.03%
😎
1
0.086%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,185reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❤️Спасибо подписчику за свежий ответ из Пенсионного фонда по поводу отказа от цифрорубля и получении пенсии наличкой.
Друзья распечатайте себе и своим родителям пенсионерам разъяснение Пенсионного фонда.
⚡️Главное в ответе:
«Действующее законодательство предусматривает два способа доставки и получения пенсии, которые призваны обеспечить передачу начисленной суммы пенсии ее получателю своевременно и и в полном разме…
Что-то очень интересное происходит на странице у Алекса Джонса— он начал публиковать видео с раввинами, в которых они говорят о том, что хотят уничтожить белую расу: Европу, США и Россию (их здесь достаточно много на канале, особенно в видео Иудаизм как радикальная форма религиозно-идеологического экстремизма https://t.me/adonarischannel/9422 ) И комментирует, называя их больными психами.
Что происходит, я не могу в…
Скандал с католической библейской ассоциацией.
p.s. Bloody circus.. Все уже становится элементарно смешным и комичным.
Католическая библейская ассоциация Америки (CBA) впервые в своей истории выбрала президента иудейского вероисповедания — им стала Эми-Джилл Левин (Amy-Jill Levine). Историческое голосование состоялось в конце июля 2026 года на 88-м ежегодном собрании ассоциации в Балтиморе, а официальное утверждени…
Огромный конвой ирландских патриотов - водителей грузовиков, трактористов и автомобилистов, заполнил все дороги в знак протеста против тирании правительства и элит, пытающихся уничтожить их образ жизни и отнять национальную идентичность.
p.s. Как было бы круто если бы в России все автомобилисты устроили такой конвой с плакатами— нет мобилизации и нет войне. По всем законам Природы у нас есть право на самозащиту. Поч…
Все было продумано и рассчитано заранее до мелочей, сегодня в войнах подожгли практически весь мир и повсюду идет страшный геноцид. И все внимание людей как правило приковано только к своей собственной проблеме и своей боли (и это вполне логично). И уже никому особо неинтересно— что там происходит в остальном мире. Потому что на это уже не хватает ни времени, ни сил.
И поэтому жестокость и зверства творимого геноцид…
Начало
▪️Солдаты в Газе с Российскими и Украинскими паспортами https://t.me/adonarischannel/12355
▪️Независимая комиссия ООН обвинила израильские силы в преднамеренном преследовании и убийствах палестинских детей, квалифицируя эти действия как ГЕНОЦИД https://t.me/adonarischannel/12489
▪️Еврейские раввины о том, что нужно убивать палестинскх детей https://t.me/adonarischannel/10648
▪️Shimon Riklin, израильский жу…
📽Видео
▪️"Мы играем не по вашим правилам. Мы играем по правилам Торы" https://t.me/adonarischannel/12514
▪️Зверства Израиля https://t.me/adonarischannel/12277
▪️Газа. Дети. https://t.me/adonarischannel/6480
▪️Евреи ликуют и радуются уничтожению детей https://t.me/adonarischannel/6363
▪️Израиль: пропаганда— вред психическому здоровью. Заражение и контроль сознания
https://t.me/adonarischannel/11868
▪️Самое тем…
Западный Берег. Израиль.
Геноцид продолжается. Газу стерли с лица земли, остался Западный Берег, где евреи уничтожают городскую инфраструктуру не бомбами, а бульдозерами— делая весь город непригодным для жизни, чтобы изгнать местных жителей.
Дополнительные ссылки
📽Видео
"Эх, батюшки-светы, дожили... Гляжу я на это видео — а там наш «верховный главнокомандующий» в морской форме, с пилоткой набекрень, сидит на крейсере «Варяг», будто настоящий адмирал из старых кинохроник. Прибыл на крейсер в обычном костюме, и там уже переоделся, видать для него специальную костюмерную отвели.
Только вот незадача: сам-то в армии срочную даже не нюхал, в казарме не ночевал, кирзу не натирал …
Начало Уголовные дела за «дискредитацию», «организацию массовых беспорядков», «призывы к уклонению».
Сопротивление будет точечным и быстроломающимся — система уже отработала механизмы 2022+ последующих лет.
Итог гипотезы
Получается конвейер: электронная повестка → ограничение прав → силовой вылов → ускоренная отправка. Без громких объявлений «всех подряд», но с системным принуждением и готовностью давить любые всп…
Начало Еще раз— это возможный, приблизительный сценарий.
Официально российские власти (Медведев, Гурулёв, Песков и др.) неоднократно заявляли, что новой волны мобилизации нет и не планируется, армия закрывает потребности контрактниками. Но ряд независимых источников говорят об обсуждениях и подготовке к новой мобилизации после сентябрьских выборов в Госдуму.
Росгвардия действительно обновила правила гражданской об…
🤬16😡3❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @adonarischannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@adonarischannel edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой стиль подачи информации вы предпочитаете? Иными словами, в каком стиле информация быстрее доходит до вашего сознания и до вашего сердца?
эмоциональный, живой29%
нейтральный12%
риторический2%
саркастический, с юмором15%
формальный, сухой4%
критический, жесткий28%
добавить свое в комментарии1%
я тут только чтобы посмотреть результаты опроса8%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 100,930 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Коваленко. НОВЫЙ МИРОВОЙ ПОРЯДОК- СОПРОТИВЛЕНИЕ @n_w_order · 112,044 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“adonaris” (@adonarischannel), 10,145 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adonarischannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.