10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,760–21,801 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 19:15
21,765
-20
13 Aug 2026, 00:24
21,785
+2
11 Aug 2026, 23:16
21,783
+3
10 Aug 2026, 21:15
21,780
+3
9 Aug 2026, 21:11
21,777
-1
8 Aug 2026, 19:50
21,778
-4
7 Aug 2026, 18:32
21,782
-14
6 Aug 2026, 16:20
21,796
+12
6 Aug 2026, 02:05
21,784
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:01
21,784
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
187.1%
avg views ÷ 21,765 subscribers
Avg views / post
40,700
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
7 (20 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
284,990
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
817
Videos
96
Links
369
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
14.3%
1 of 7 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,590
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
22,400
over 6 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Ranyn34cuR
1
14 August 2026
14 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Advertisementerid 2Ranyn34cuRForwarded from @citydriveruPhoto
Как насчёт побывать на Outline, не выходя из машины?
В этом году фестиваль не состоялся — но его атмосферу теперь можно поймать в наших московских каршах.
Ищите вкладыш с QR-кодом в машине, сканируйте и переключайтесь между сценами ВУДЗ, МЕЙН, БАЛКОН, БАР У РЕКИ, СТЕЛЛА и НЕОН. В плейлисте — сеты Denis Korablev, CPSL, Ranishe Niyaak b2b Andrey Kling, Tania Andrianova, Electric Blue и Michael Dop, которые должны были…
🔆 Новости на начало августа
Идет обработка возвратов, по части заявок они уже произведены. В связи с объемом, для проведения всех выплат требуется время. Деньги будут возвращены по всем заявкам.
❤️ Команда бесконечно благодарна тем, кто решил не сдавать билеты. Ваша поддержка в этот момент бесценна!
⚡️ В рамках договоренностей с организаторами событий Signal, New Star Weekend, Круто и клубом DEX* предлагаются опци…
❤️ Спасибо за поддержку и теплые слова!
Информация о возврате билетов. Вернуть можно все: билеты всех типов, опции в кемпингах, трансферы, места на парковке и т.д.
Все, что вы решите не сдавать — автоматически переносится на следующий Outline. Это наивысшая форма поддержки и доверия. Мы бесконечно благодарны всей аудитории фестиваля и каждому, кто проявил солидарность с командой!
Вчерашняя новость пришла в момент,…
Outline 2026 не состоится.
Администрация Талдомского района вынесла распоряжение об отмене события в связи с угрозой беспилотной опасности в регионе проведения.
Команда Outline предприняла все, чтобы этот фестиваль стал лучшим. Мы продумали каждую деталь и по-настоящему ждали встречи с вами... Сейчас важно, что все, что мы создали, остается. А значит, мы вернемся!
Информация о билетах появится в ближайшее время.
…
404.ZERO ✕ Т-БАНК
404.zero — международно известный дуэт медиахудожников Кристины Карпышевой и Александра Лециуса — совместно с Т-Банком представляет свето-звуковую инсталляцию «1.0».
В лесу возникает поле из сотен гибких светящихся стеблей. Они движутся от ветра и шагов, соприкасаются и отвечают звуком. Каждый огонек живет в собственном ритме, но иногда всё поле на мгновение синхронизируется: вспышки складываются …
⚪️Новый мерч Outline! Герои съемки: Utah, Artem Orlov, Raumtester и Angelina.
В коллекции. Оверсайз-худи и худи на молнии с капюшоном. Нейлоновый виндстопер с лесным принтом. Куртка из вареного хлопка со вставкой-принтом, светло-серого цвета и двусторонняя: черная / серая. Слим-зип, принтованный топ с капюшоном. Сумка-батон из вареного нейлона с двумя отсеками на молнии, в двух вариантах: с принтом и цвета зеленый н…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @outlinefestival. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 756 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 67 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@outlinefestival named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tomrus named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘖𝘜𝘛𝘓𝘐𝘕𝘌” (@outlinefestival), 21,765 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/outlinefestival.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.