Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ХAOСTИKA

@haostika

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

290subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002491014451
TypeChannel
Username@haostika
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/haostika

Growth

290291290.57 Aug 2026, 18:21 — 291 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:17 — 291 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:26 — 290 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:218 Aug 2026, 14:26
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 290–291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 14:26290-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:17291no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:21291first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.6%
avg views ÷ 290 subscribers
Avg views / post
213
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (9 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,560
Reactions total220
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 25s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

316 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7323.1%
🔥6921.8%
custom 5202131192836553479299.18%
custom 5201947359646347867185.70%
custom 5201985640689858517175.38%
🙏175.38%
❤‍🔥154.75%
👏154.75%
🆒134.11%
🌚92.85%
custom 520183420443796937082.53%
custom 520188074899855727982.53%
🥰72.22%
😍51.58%
custom 520167729639774492241.27%
custom 520191050023701412841.27%
custom 520211987559772611330.949%
😭20.633%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 316reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 17 we hold a reading for · 59%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @haostika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC77 views23 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥105❤‍🔥4🆒4

4 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC161 views19 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

9🔥6❤‍🔥3custom 52019856406898585171

3 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC197 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Очень активный понедельник у нас! Из минусов: сдали тендер утром и сразу получили отбивку об отмене мероприятия(( Из плюсов: пришли 4 запроса (2 из них от новых клиентов) - такое мы любим! А как ваш понедельник проходит?

custom 52019856406898585177custom 52021311928365534796🌚5

29 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC256 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 52016772963977449223custom 52021198755977261133custom 52021311928365534792

29 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC261 views30 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Именно так сейчас выглядит наша команда! Потому что мы ВЫИГРАЛИ тендер и будем ДРИФТИТЬ по полной. И да, дым тоже будет! Нас поздравляем с победой, а вам следующим постом в подарок будет музыкальный трек!

🔥16❤‍🔥53👏2🆒2custom 52019856406898585172

28 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC233 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

9🔥9🙏7custom 52019856406898585172custom 52021311928365534791

24 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC273 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Работа кипит Удаленка вошла в офис Лангольеры И еще много разных подписей можно и нужно придумать в комментариях к этому видео! Всех с пятницей, друзья! И, конечно, всем хорошего настроения!

👏74custom 52021311928365534793custom 52018807489985572792❤‍🔥1🆒1

21 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC218 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Просто хотим поддержать команду фестиваля OUTLINE! «Сил вам, ребята!»

🙏7custom 52018342044379693703custom 52021311928365534793😭1

21 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC215 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @outlinefestivalVideo

Outline 2026 не состоится. Администрация Талдомского района вынесла распоряжение об отмене события в связи с угрозой беспилотной опасности в регионе проведения. Команда Outline предприняла все, чтобы этот фестиваль стал лучшим. Мы продумали каждую деталь и по-настоящему ждали встречи с вами... Сейчас важно, что все, что мы создали, остается. А значит, мы вернемся! Информация о билетах появится в ближайшее время.

😭1

19 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC230 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Вместо множества фотографий решили поделиться с вами атмосферным вечерним видео нашего стенда! Оба дня фестиваля он был таким же ярким, как и Московское солнце ☀️ @vkfest

6custom 52021311928365534795custom 52019856406898585173custom 52019473596463478672🆒1

18 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC217 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лицо руководителя проекта, когда все стартовало и идет успешно! #vkfest2026

8🔥6🌚4🥰2custom 52019473596463478672

16 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC222 views22 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥106👏3custom 52019105002370141282😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @haostika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ХAOСTИKA” (@haostika), 290 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haostika.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.