Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

عُمَری فان😆

@omar_fun

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

893subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001782062749
TypeChannel
Username@omar_fun
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/omar_fun

Growth

893894893.57 Aug 2026, 08:21 — 894 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:33 — 894 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:00 — 893 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:217 Aug 2026, 20:00
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 893–894 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 20:00893-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:33894no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:21894first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.9%
avg views ÷ 893 subscribers
Avg views / post
374
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (17 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,362
Reactions total202
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

202 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6833.7%
🤣5426.7%
👎2713.4%
🔥2311.4%
💯94.46%
🤷52.48%
👏41.98%
31.49%
👌31.49%
😁20.99%
😡10.495%
😱10.495%
🤯10.495%
🤷‍♀10.495%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC3 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اشغل الجاهلین بالجاهلین موضع متناقض دو ادمین وهابی در قبال ما وقتی به کلام ابن حزم در باب وضو احتجاج کردیم یک ادمین میگوید ابن حزم اشتباه کرده چنین گفته و ادمین دیگر میگوید ابن حزم این حرف را نزده‼️ اینها را به حال خودشان رها کنیم دائم مشغول ردیه زدن به یکدیگر خواهند بود #عمری_فان #سنت_دروغین 🆔 @omar_fun

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC84 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Raahe_Etrat

🛑شیخ الاسلامِ مالکی: متعه حلال است! ⚠️ابن عاشور رئیس مفتیان و شیخ الاسلام مذهب مالکی قائل به اباحه و جواز متعه بوده‼️ محمد الطاهر بن عاشور: رئيس المفتين المالكيين بتونس وشيخ جامع الزيتونة وفروعه بتونس. مولده ووفاته ودراسته بها. عين (عام ١٩٣٢) شيخا للإسلام مالكيا. وهو من أعضاء المجمعين العربيين في دمشق والقاهرة. https://shamela.ws/author/77 🔰نظر شیخ الاسلام ابن عاشور راجع متعه: وَالَّذِي يُسْتَخْلَصُ مِنْ مُخْتَلِ

👍3👎1

4 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC184 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‼️ خلاصه‌ی چت بنده برای هناهنگی در خصوص مناظره با مخالفین و فرار آنها از مباحث اصولی 🛑 عموما این جماعت در مباحث عقلی و اصولی حتی مقدمات‌ را نمیدانند بلکه هنر آنها صرفا جمع و نقل روایات است بنابراین اگر جایی فکر کنند طرف مقابل میخواهد بحث اصولی کنند فرار را بر قرار ترجیح میدهند!!!! 🔹 مدتی قبل بنده در پاسخ به یکی از کانال های مخالفین یک تحدی را ارائه داده بودم: 🆔 https://t.me/javaheralklam/2403 بعد از این تحدی شخصی

👍81👎1👏1

31 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTCviews —

عُمَری فان😆 pinned «#تذکر_مهم: 🔹 هدف از معرفی برخی کانال‌ها، #صرفاً آشنایی مخاطبان با منابع، پژوهش‌ها و دیدگاه‌های موجود در موضوعات مختلف است و این معرفی، به هیچ‌وجه به معنای تأیید تمام مطالب، مبانی، تحلیل‌ها، استدلال‌ها یا نتایج مطرح‌شده در آن‌ها نیست. 🔸 چه‌بسا در یک کانال،…»

31 Jul 2026, 02:01 UTC357 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

کلیپ مباهله مذکور مباهله بر سر کفر سیوطی اهل بدعت بودن ابوحنیفه و نووی و لعنت فرستادن بر خود در صورت کذب ادعاها! https://t.me/omar_fun/1721 #عمری_فان #سنت_دروغین 🆔 @omar_fun

🤷51👍1

30 Jul 2026, 20:48 UTC353 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#تذکر_مهم: 🔹 هدف از معرفی برخی کانال‌ها، #صرفاً آشنایی مخاطبان با منابع، پژوهش‌ها و دیدگاه‌های موجود در موضوعات مختلف است و این معرفی، به هیچ‌وجه به معنای تأیید تمام مطالب، مبانی، تحلیل‌ها، استدلال‌ها یا نتایج مطرح‌شده در آن‌ها نیست. 🔸 چه‌بسا در یک کانال، مطالب ارزشمند و قابل استفاده‌ای وجود داشته باشد و در عین حال، برخی دیدگاه‌ها یا استدلال‌های آن از نظر ما قابل پذیرش نباشد؛ همان‌گونه که ممکن است در مواردی با تحلی

👍4🤣1😁1

29 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC488 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اهل بدعت بودن ابوحنیفه و نووی اهل تسنن نبودن (تکفیر) ابوحنیفه و نووی کفر یا اسلام سیوطی 🔺موضوعات مباهله بین وهابی ها🔺 بدون شرح .... کار وهابی ها از تکفیر شیعیان گذشته و به تکفیر ائمه و علمای خودشان مانند ابوحنیفه، نووی و سیوطی رسیده است! چند صباح دیگر ابن تیمیه را به مقام نبوت و الوهیت میرسانند و کل جهان را تکفیر میکنند. #عمری_فان #سنت_دروغین 🆔 @omar_fun

👍4👌2👎1

27 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC328 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @javaheralklamPhoto

#تحدی_علمی 🔹 بنده این شخص و هر کسی را که چنین ادعایی دارد، به تحدی دعوت می‌کنم که در یکی از مسائل اختلافی میان شیعه و اهل‌سنت، صرفاً از منابع حدیثی معتبر امامیه ثابت کند که نظر مورد اتفاق فقه و عقیده‌ی شیعه، مخالف سخن اهل‌بیت علیهم‌السلام است و در مقابل، نظر اهل‌سنت همان نظر اهل‌بیت علیهم‌السلام است. 🔸 توجه شود که محل بحث، استدلال از منابع حدیثی خود شیعه است؛ بنابراین استناد به منابع اهل‌سنت یا اقوال علما خارج از م

👍7👎2👏1

25 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC378 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @salman_e_farsi

😄❤️هندگفت: مگه زن آزاد هم زنا میکنه؟ در آن هنگام پیامبر به عمر نگاه کرد و خندید !!! داستانی از کتب اهل سنت درباره مادر خانومی معاویه لع: 🆘«میان یزید بن معاویه و اسحاق بن طلحه ، در حضور معاویه، گفت‌وگویی درگرفت. یزید گفت: "ای اسحاق! برای تو بهتر است که همهٔ بنی‌حرب وارد بهشت شوند." اسحاق گفت: "و به خدا سوگند، برای تو بهتر است که همهٔ بنی‌عباس وارد بهشت شوند." پس از آنکه اسحاق برخاست، معاویه به یزید گفت: "آیا م

🤣15

25 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC990 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

قربانیان مسیار امرأة سنية (منى مكي مدير مركز أمان لضيافة الأطفال) تشكو من انتشار المسيار عند أهل السنة السعودية وتقول: "غير شرعين في أطفال من زواج مسيار مثلا تقول بس عشان شرط المسيار إنه ما أخلف طيب أنا حملت يعني وين فيتخلون عن الطفل يسلمونه وكذا واحدة قد تواصلت معي أنا شخصيا تقول لي أنا بعطيك الطفل قلت لها أعتذر منك سلميه للجهات الرسمية" زن سنی (مونا مکی مدیر مرکز امان) از رواج مسیار در بین اهل تسنن عربستان شکایت

🤣8👎1🤯1😱1

23 Jul 2026, 16:10 UTC338 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Raahe_Etrat

💢صحابی کافر💢 1⃣مغیره بن شعبه به امام علی دشنام میدهد المغيرةَ بنَ شعبةَ سبَّ عليَّ بنَ أبي طالبٍ 📚السلسلة الصحيحة 5/520 2⃣دشنام دهنده به صحابه مسلمان نیست قال: وسمعت أبا عبد اللَّه يقول: قال مالك [بن أنس]: الذي يشتم أصحاب النبي -صلى اللَّه عليه وسلم- ليس له سهم، أو قال: نصيب في الإسلام. 📚الجامع لعلوم الإمام أحمد ج 4 ص 562 Raahe_Etrat | راه عترت

👍10👎1😡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @omar_fun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 535,502 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عُمَری فان😆” (@omar_fun), 893 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omar_fun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.