Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تحقیقات

Channel

تحقیقات

@bazgasht_be_shie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

101subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002327849908
TypeChannel
Username@bazgasht_be_shie
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bazgasht_be_shie

Growth

81101918 August 2026 — 81 subscribers9 August 2026 — 81 subscribers17 August 2026 — 84 subscribers25 August 2026 — 91 subscribers31 August 2026 — 97 subscribers10 September 2026 — 98 subscribers19 September 2026 — 101 subscribers8 August 202619 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78–104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:01101+3
10 Sept 2026, 19:1798+1
31 Aug 2026, 19:3597+6
25 Aug 2026, 02:3691+7
17 Aug 2026, 09:2984+3
9 Aug 2026, 18:3281no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:1681first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
583.3%
👍116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC54 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

پاسخ به شبهات بزرگترین جهاد استــــــ بـــــــراے این جـــــــهاد امــــــــاده باشــــــــــیــــــــــــد 🍃🌟کانال منهاج البدعة الامویة، شبکه دفاع از شیعه🌟🍃 🔴مناظره 🔴مباحثه🔴گفتگوی علمی 🔍ارائه مقالات و پایان نامه ها و کتب کلامی و اعتقادی ناب 🔍ارائه تخصصی مقالات دررد ونقد مذهب جماعت موسوم به اهل سنت 🔍نقد تخصصی کانال ها و شبکه های وهابیت 🔍نقد تخصصی شبهات وارده به مسئله اجتهاد و تقلید و

31 May 2026, 05:33 UTC340 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

حضرت رسول الله صلی الله علیه و اله به عایشه توصیه میفرماید به جنگ جمل نرود. این حدیث« کلاب حواب» نام دارد ــــــــــــــــــــ 🟣طریق اول: عایشه حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جَعْفَرٍ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ أَبِي خَالِدٍ، عَنْ قَيْسِ بْنِ أَبِي حَازِمٍ، أَنَّ عَائِشَةَ، قَالَتْ: لَمَّا أَتَتْ عَلَى الْحَوْأَبِ سَمِعَتْ نُبَاحَ الْكِلَابِ، فَقَالَتْ: مَا أَظُنُّنِي إِلَّا رَاجِعَةٌ، إِنَّ رَ

4

11 May 2026, 07:00 UTC122 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

❌اشکال: اشکالی که شده اولا به منکر الحدیث بودن قیس شده: وَقَال علي بْن المديني: قال لي يحيى بْن سَعِيد: قَيْس بْن أَبي حازم منكر الحديث - ثُمَّ ذكر له يَحْيَى أحاديث مناكير منها حديث كلاب الحوأب - وَقَال أَبُو سَعِيد الأشج [2] : سمعت أَبَا خَالِد الأحمر يَقُول لعَبد الله بْن نُمَيْر: يَا أَبَا هشام أما تذكر إِسْمَاعِيل بْن أَبي خَالِد وهُوَ يَقُول: حَدَّثَنَا قَيْس بْن أَبي حازم هذه الإسطوانة يَعْنِي أَنَّهُ في ال

1👍1

11 May 2026, 06:53 UTC87 viewsread 9 August 2026

مویدات بیشتر از #کلاب #حواب مسروق عن عایشه حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، نا يَزِيدُ بْنُ مَوْهَبٍ، ثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ زَكَرِيَّا بْنِ أَبِي زَائِدَةَ، عَنْ مُجَالِدٍ، عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، عَنْ مَسْرُوقٍ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، قَالَتْ: كَانَ يَوْمٌ مِنَ السَّنَةِ تَجَمَّعَ فِيهِ نِسَاءُ ...«كَيْفَ بِإِحْدَاكُنَّ تَنْبَحُ عَلَيْهَا كِلَابُ الْحَوْأَبِ» https://lib.efatwa.ir/42122/6/233 طاوس: تابعی عَنِ ابْنِ طَاوُ

6 Jan 2026, 18:59 UTCviews —

تحقیقات pinned «★اثبات متعه النساء نزد اهل سنت★ [مبحثی تقریبا کامل برای محققین] ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ 1️⃣ قسمت مطالب مربوطه به خود ایه و فهم از ایه مشاهـــــده ----------------------------------- 2️⃣ قسمت حلال متعه نزد صحابی های بزرگ اهل…»

6 Jan 2026, 18:59 UTCviews —

تحقیقات pinned «اسناد فرار شیخین بخصوص عمر بن الخطاب از جنگ #خیبر ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ 1️⃣➖استدلال به ایه فتح خیبر 2️⃣➖ طرق نقل واقعه 3️⃣➖طریق دیگر از نقل واقعه 📖ترجمه متن با هوش مصنوعی یک دو ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ…»

6 Jan 2026, 18:59 UTCviews —

تحقیقات pinned «حدیث: امام علی[علیه السلام] ولیکم بعدی امام علی علیه السلام بعد از من سرپرست و اولی بکم برای شماست به جهت لفظ #بعدی این حدیث مهم هست و الا برای واژه دوست لفظ بعدی بکار نمیبرن. ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ 1️⃣ عمران بن حصین 2️⃣ابن…»

6 Jan 2026, 18:59 UTCviews —

تحقیقات pinned «حدیث ثقلیـــــــــــن «↓↓↓» ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ 🔰پیامبر اکرم صلوات الله علیه و ال فرمودن: «من میان شما دو جانشین قرار میدهم،ڪتاب خدا وعترتم اهل بیتم، وآن دو از یڪدیگر جدا نخواهند شد تا آنڪه بر حوض وارد شوند  📌قران…»

6 Jan 2026, 18:59 UTCviews —

تحقیقات pinned «تواتر وضوی شیعه در کتب اهل سنت✅ ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ ♨️صحابه امام علی علیه السلام ۷ طریق: مشاهده ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ ابن عباس=صحابی 5️⃣➖عطاء بن یسار 6️⃣➖عکرمة 7️⃣➖محمد بن عقیل بن أبی طالب 8️⃣➖الرُّبَيِّعِ…»

6 Jan 2026, 18:48 UTC503 viewsread 9 August 2026

★اثبات متعه النساء نزد اهل سنت★ [مبحثی تقریبا کامل برای محققین] ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ 1️⃣ قسمت مطالب مربوطه به خود ایه و فهم از ایه مشاهـــــده ----------------------------------- 2️⃣ قسمت حلال متعه نزد صحابی های بزرگ اهل سنت مشاهـــــــــده ----------------------------------- 3️⃣ تضعیف روایات نقد ادله تحریم متعه النساء مشاهــــــــده ----------------------------------- 4️⃣ قسمت نقد

6 Jan 2026, 18:39 UTC69 viewsread 9 August 2026

تضعیف روایات تحریم متعه از صحابه و تابعین. ⛔❌ بیشتر این روایت ها با اسناد #ضعیف امده یا در باب خود #شاذ هست یا روایتی #ناقض روایت دیگر است. ---------------------------------- ابن عباس؛=شاذ❌ یــــک • دو ---------------------------------- ابوهریره =ضعیف❌ ---------------------------------- عمر بن الخطاب =ضعیف و جعلی❌ ---------------------------------- حارث بن غریة سهل بن ساعدی کعب بن مالک هر سه مورد=ضعیف❌

6 Jan 2026, 18:39 UTC115 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026

اثبات اشتباه بودن تحریم خبر خیبر در مورد متعه النساء ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ 🔘 «۵» صحابه ای که تحریم متعه خیبر را اورده اند که؛ #ضعیف و #شاذ هستند و اصلا قابل احتجاج نیستند ابن مسعود =شاذ ✘ زید بن خالد بن الجهنی =ضعیف✘ کعب بن مالک =مضطرب و ضعیف✘ عبدالله بن عمر =شاذ ✘ ثعلبة بن الحکم=ضعیف✘ ---------------------------------- امام علی علیه السلام =اثبات جعلی بودن انتساب تحریم در متعه

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bazgasht_be_shie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تحقیقات” (@bazgasht_be_shie), 101 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bazgasht_be_shie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.