Channel
@redguelderrose
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,047subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001236191974 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @redguelderrose |
| Created | 18 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/redguelderrose |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 1,047 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 1,049 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 1,049 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 July 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 5,511 |
| Reactions total | 159 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
159 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 29 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 17.0% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 16.4% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 8.18% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 6.92% | |
| ✍ | 10 | 6.29% | |
| 🍌 | 10 | 6.29% | |
| 🙈 | 7 | 4.40% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 3.14% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 3.14% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 3.14% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 2.52% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 1.89% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 1.26% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.629% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.629% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Инопланетная жизнь и возможная форма пиздеца. Я поел жаренной рыбки и подумал вот. Ксеносы/инопланетяне или как вам угодно их называть по моральной оценке права на существование должны классифицироваться не по вопросам науки, а по вопросу религии и не важно верите вы во что то или нет Эта сухая логика. Если я узнаю что определенный вид обладая разумом и социальной структурой ебет и жрет своих детей - мне, возможн…
❤7
Минутка нытья, блять как же ебучие бляди испортили своим существованием слово "хохол" это пизда. Вот блять щас "я хохол" ассоциируется с чем то в стиле "продаю гуманитарку", это трагедия нахуй А может просто это я дурачек термин дрочу как мне удобно, ну а хули много кто так делает, а мне низя что-ли?
💯8
Все, пока умные вещи не пишу, а то голова лопнет у меня, да и у тебя тоже
👍3
Почему? Я ахуел? Нет, просто сигналы "нам все нравится, слава правительству" очень быстро могут привести к хуевым вещам Это не вопрос конкретных лиц у власти. Не вопрос времени и идеологий государства. Это факт работы нашего мозга. Поставьте меня у руля и излишне захвалите и я рано или поздно стану уебаном. Впрочем, это не означает что надо кидать кал на 360 просто на всякий случай, ведь если общество держит ста…
👍6❤1
Если что, я все равно буду в какой то степени недоволен действиями властей в почти любое время и мне будет мало хорошего потому что я хохол. Это моя, условно говоря, идеология. И вся наша история лишь питает мое осознание своей правоты.
💯7❤4
И ещё пять копеек. С опозданием на год, лол Тогда не было такого размаха потому что без массивного (эпического прям) инфоповода и некой формы лидерства общество не будет делать НИХУЯ в подавляющем большинстве случаев И это не мы такие плохие как нация, а человеческий разум так работает и можно это не принимать и с ветряными мельницами махаться, а можно принять и работать с этим если интерес и ресурсы есть.
❤8
Кстати, тем кто в жертву принес свою репутацию ради сырка, я надеюсь вам хотя бы заплатили
🍌5
А год назад то некоторые говорили мол "за набу вышли а за проблемы армии не вышли фу" Это что получается разрыв между гражданским и военными пускай и очевидно существует, но искусственно усиливался (и продолжает) разного калибра и сторон говноедами? И оказывается тылу на военных не похуй? Вообще это и тогда было очевидно, но бурление общества штука сложная и не по щелчку пальца происходит
👍2🤯1
Всему активному обществу спасибо конечно, но не забываем за причастность действующих военных которые публично выступали против сырка. Эти люди сделали чудовищно рискованную ставку. Ну, а так по факту смотреть будем. Я уже немного зрадоеб зашуганный давно, так что ебал радоваться раньше времени. Абы новому человеку на должности руки не выкручивали и не заставляли продолжать гнуть мясофаршную линию.
🔥13
Какие то не смешные цифры вышли у опроса, я обиделся и удаляю на похуй
😢4
Сыр и Федоров - это вопрос вообще сложный, честно говоря Вот из плюсов топить за сырка вижу такие: 1) Человек науправлял такой хуеты что можно до самой смерти говорить что я бы в армию пошел конечно, но слыхал что куда ни пойди то можно внезапно спать лечь в одном месте а проснуться в телеге как в Скайриме, только вместо плененного Брата Бури будет сидеть чел с шевроном Скалы 2)Ну он уж точно не мовнюк А из минусо…
👍8🤣4💋2
А, чисто на всякий, я полностью слился с маняфантазий об отдаче голоса за тех или иных правых на выборах, если вообще до них доживу . Потеря доверия + абсолютное непонимание целей + полное отсутствие понимания зачем мне это. Даже обсуждать не заинтересован и вряд-ли более коснусь этого вопроса шо в жизни шо в интернете. Как то так.
💯7🫡3🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @redguelderrose. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 868,946 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психотроний свінарнік” (@redguelderrose), 1,047 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redguelderrose.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.