Channel
@neudascha
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,800subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001077811658 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neudascha |
| Created | 29 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neudascha |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 8 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @dirtytatarstan/838245 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC | @neudascha/175398 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC | 1.00 | 67 minutes |
| @dirtytatarstan/838285 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC | @neudascha/175407 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC | 1.00 | 74 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @dirtytatarstan | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 85 minutes | @dirtytatarstan (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 45 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 8, the earliest publisher we hold is @sidpolit. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 3,800 | -17 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 3,817 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 3,826 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 3,826 | first reading |
54 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 54 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 54 (5 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,247 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤯 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В Тюменской области не будет дистанционного электронного голосования на выборах. Выборы депутатов Госдумы РФ и Тюменской облдумы пройдут в оффлайн-формате, так как регион не включили в пилотный проект ДЭГ. По словам зампредседателя облизбиркома Андрея Николаева, Тюменская область является сложным субъектом, и для применения ДЭГ необходимо согласие ХМАО и ЯНАО. В УрФО дистанционное электронное голосование применяетс…
Племяннику президента Роману Путину наконец нашли должность в «Единой России», с прямым подчинением секретарю генсовета Владимиру Якушеву. Табличка уже появилась в партийном офисе на Кутузовской. В статусе советника Якушева Путин будет курировать молодежную политику партии - МГЕР, сторонников, НКО, малый и средний бизнес, а также взаимодействие с госкорпорациями, такими как Росатом, РЖД, Ростех и Газпром. Отдельное н…
Неужели это правда? Надо побольше сюда завести этих учёных, мы сможем многому научиться у преподавателей этой древней цивилизации. Ведь даже насекомые преисполнились. Подписаться | Предложить новость
1903 год Казань правый берег озера Кабан
И еще об «Ижавиа». Ольга Абрамова вполне ожидаемо бросилась выправлять косяки прошлой команды по ситуации с авиакомпанией, фактически прекратившей деятельность после отзыва сертификата эксплуатанта. Врио главы Удмуртии уже повстречалась в Москве с руководителем Росавиации Дмитрием Ядровым. В официальных сообщениях прозвучал ряд позитивных и дежурных заявлений о будущем взаимодействии, работе по устранению замечаний…
Пишут, что бывший директор свердловского ДИПа Александр Рыжков вернулся в администрацию губернатора. Этим летом Рыжков покинул должность директора департамента социологии и политологии УрФУ, которую занимал на протяжении трёх лет. К тому моменту по истеблишменту уже ползли слухи о том, что он может в том или ином качестве войти в команду губернатора Дениса Паслера. В нулевых Рыжков работал под началом областного пр…
Сейчас годна из главных тем закулисных разговоров в Дзержинске – это грядущая отставка главы города Михаила Клинкова. Первая мысль о том, что Клинков в Дзержинске ненадолго, возникла ещё в январе 2025 года. Тогда стало заметно, что Клинков стал отходить от преемственности власти, которую сам декларировал при избрании в Думе в октябре 2024 года. Хорошо помню, как человек из команды Клинкова сказал мне, что клинковцы о…
С начала 2026 года в России ежемесячно закрываются 12-15 тыс. компаний по экономическим причинам. Это примерно втрое больше, чем в предыдущие годы, подсчитал Центр макроэкономических исследований «Сбера» на основе статистики Федеральной налоговой службы. В расчеты не вошли организации, которые налоговые органы исключили из реестра как фактически недействующие. Речь идет о компаниях, самостоятельно прекративших работ…
Партия "Яблоко" приняла решениe подать встречный иск "за клевету" в отношении депутата Алексея Журавлева "В партии «Яблоко» ознакомились с видеозаписью выступления депутата Государственной Думы от ЛДПР Алексея Журавлева у здания Верховногo суда. Выступление содержит клеветнические высказывания в адрес партии «Яблоко». Сегодня в суд будет подано исковое заявление о защите деловой репутации партии. Исковое заявление…
«Веселого молочника» Джастаса Уолкера собираются выдворить из России! Американский фермер, который прославился в 2014 году знаменитой фразой про «итальянский сыр», сообщил, что его семье планируют аннулировать вид на жительство. Джастас живет в России с самого детства и уже много лет развивает собственное сельское хозяйство в Алтайском крае. По его словам, известие об аннулировании ВНЖ стало для семьи полным шоком. …
Очень странная получилась история с аукционом на право аренды свежепостроенного ресторанного павильона в парке Берёзовая роща. Вчера администрация города радостно отчиталась о том, что торги завершились и есть победитель — известный ижевский предприниматель. Однако, если внимательно изучить страницу процедуры, то выясняется, что никаких торгов-то и не было. Аукцион не состоялся, на торги заявился единственный участ…
45 лет назад, в августе 1981 года на экраны СССР вышел фильм «Тегеран-43», который произвел настоящий фурор в нашей стране. В фильме описаны события конференции лидеров СССР, Великобритании и США в Тегеране, которая прошла в 1943 году. По сюжету, разведка нацисткой Германии задумала убийство лидеров стран- участниц конференции. Покушение на Сталина, Рузвельта, Черчилля должны были исполнить диверсанты Отто Скорцени,…
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @neudascha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 307,253 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@neudascha named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НеудаЩа — Волга и Урал” (@neudascha), 3,800 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neudascha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.