Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Очки Бречалова

Channel

Очки Бречалова

@obrech

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,470subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001135528997
TypeChannel
Username@obrech
DescriptionПолитический канал Удмуртии. Все предложения шлите на [email protected]
Created26 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/obrech

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,43714,47814,457.514,4706 August 202611 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 98 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,431–14,484 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 20:1114,470+1
8 Nov 2026, 15:5614,469-1
7 Nov 2026, 09:3714,470+2
6 Nov 2026, 12:3614,468-1
5 Nov 2026, 14:3614,469-2
4 Nov 2026, 17:4814,471-1
3 Nov 2026, 14:3714,472+2
2 Nov 2026, 16:2714,470-1
1 Nov 2026, 15:4914,471-1
31 Oct 2026, 12:2614,472+1
30 Oct 2026, 09:5414,471-4
29 Oct 2026, 08:0714,475+2
28 Oct 2026, 03:0614,473-5
27 Oct 2026, 01:4814,478+1
25 Oct 2026, 22:4814,477+3
25 Oct 2026, 01:3914,474+3
23 Oct 2026, 22:1014,471+1
23 Oct 2026, 01:3614,470+2
22 Oct 2026, 03:4014,468+3
20 Oct 2026, 19:4914,465first reading

Engagement

75 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.1%
avg views ÷ 14,470 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,390
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
12
of 75 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held75 (29 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total88,680
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 07:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,020
Videos
≈387
Links
≈3,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 46s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 09:03 UTC≈3,000 viewsread 12 November 2026

А за Голубевым и Слугина. Пока все это перестановки малозначительные. Будут и серьезнее перемены. Но не в конце года. Кстати, тут к нам в комменты пришел Эмиль Бикмеев - сказать, что он работает и уходить не собирается. Ну сказал. Запомните этот твит, как говорится. Его должность серьезной не назовешь. Так что... И интересно как справлялась корпорация развития до сих пор без "специального представителя по федеральном…

10 Nov 2026, 09:16 UTC≈4,130 viewsread 12 November 2026

Еще один пошёл. Ну этому предложили небольшой парашют. И ненадолго, вангуем. Потихоньку Абрамова избавляется от бречаловской плесени. Ждем Журавлева на вылет. Кстати и сам директор корпорации так называемого развития тоже готовится.

10 Nov 2026, 06:40 UTC≈4,360 viewsread 12 November 2026

И как же это, интересно, так вышло, что минстрой не заметил такого ограничения? Вот на какой вопрос должна искать ответ прокуратура.

10 Nov 2026, 05:12 UTC≈4,610 viewsread 12 November 2026

Анекдот. По данным статистики Удмуртия оказалась на втором месте в России по качеству дорог.

5 Nov 2026, 10:23 UTC≈7,460 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

В догонку к предыдущей новости промониторили для вас цены на парковку в соседних и не очень аэропортах. Выводы делайте сами.

4 Nov 2026, 05:19 UTC≈6,660 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @life_udmurtia

Уважаемая авиакомпания «Ижавиа» (или кто там сейчас отвечает за аэропортовое хозяйство)! Объясните, чем отличается «суточная парковка» от «долгосрочной»? Особенно если учесть, что стоимость одна и та же — 750 рублей в сутки. Или всё дело только в отсутствии на последней льгот для инвалидов? Ну так и назовите её — «льготная». Отдельное «спасибо» за ценник. 750 рублей в сутки — это больше, чем в городах-миллионниках …

4 Nov 2026, 05:19 UTC≈6,040 viewsread 12 November 2026

Непонятно чего удивляются коллеги. Авиакомпания разрушена и восстановлена уже не будет, деньги банально проели, самолеты однозначно будут проданы (глава пообещала), аэропорт тоже будет продан, новым хозяевам выгодно поднять все тарифы ДО сделки, пока это можно сделать простым решением.

27 Oct 2026, 11:19 UTC≈9,010 viewsread 12 November 2026

А в чем прецедент? У Бречалова как прецедент нужно рассматривать обратный вариант - работал с ним и не сел - вот это чудо. И среди не севших там были такие лютые претенденты, что непонятно как их вообще пронесло. А может и не пронесло еще

23 Oct 2026, 18:34 UTC≈11,900 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Короче выяснилось чего не хватало учителям России, по мнению федеральных чиновников, для статуса. Это удостоверение. Дб, б. Уровень конечно. Что же удивляться, что сюда к нам Бречаловых присылают. Там то вот такое работает

23 Oct 2026, 11:32 UTC≈10,000 viewsread 12 November 2026

Судя по тому, с каким воодушевлением местные СМИ восприняли новость о назначении Бурановой советников ио главы УР, кадровые перестановки в республиканской власти ожидаются с нетерпением. Конечно Буранова - не тот человек, который способен что-то там улучшить - типичная местечковая карьеристка, ничем себя не зарекомендовавшая в госдуме. Но менять нужно и нужно искать людей, которые действительно могут что-то изменить …

22 Oct 2026, 07:20 UTC≈9,210 viewsread 12 November 2026

По поводу Чистякова одно можно сказать наверняка — если он говорит о сроках, то они точно будут нарушены. Такой вот уровень управления.

16 Oct 2026, 11:38 UTC≈12,300 viewsread 12 November 2026

В принципе последние заявления Абрамовой и людей из минтранспорта РФ, которые продемонстрировали попутно изрядное непонимание реальной ситуации, дают призрачную надежду на то, что "Ижавиа" могут вернуть сертификат. Ну хотя бы потому что без него пассажиропоток в Ижевске будет снижаться неминуемо. Впрочем пока далеко не не факт, что вернут - в Росавиации на этот счет кажется свои расклады. И тут, кстати, вышла интерес…

Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @obrech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @obrech as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
24 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бречалов
@brechalov · 53,660
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
АБРАМОВА. О главном.
@AbramovaUR · 23,399
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 September 2026
Ижевск Где Гай Стоят ® ИГГС
@IGGS18r · 36,625
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 1 September 2026
МДПС - Местоположение ДПС Ижевск (ЧП и ДТП)
@mdps18 · 28,153
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 9 September 2026
ЗИ - ЗЛОЙ ИЖЕВЧАНИН / НОВОСТИ УДМУРТИИ и Ижевска
@zloyizhevchanin · 72,567
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 20 August 2026
Ижевск с огоньком
@izhevsktop1 · 40,875
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026
Udm-Info
@udm_info · 20,377
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Очки Бречалова” (@obrech), 14,470 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obrech.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.