Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

FinFocus

@fin_focus_uz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,542subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001248757652
TypeChannel
Username@fin_focus_uz
Created7 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fin_focus_uz

Growth

2,5422,5502,5465 August 2026 — 2,550 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,550 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,549 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,547 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,542 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,541–2,551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:172,542-5
9 Aug 2026, 05:032,547-2
6 Aug 2026, 14:552,549-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:322,550no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:172,550first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 14s
Average length
2m 37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁4640.0%
2320.0%
👍2118.3%
🔥86.96%
🤝76.09%
🫡43.48%
😢32.61%
🤔32.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2024 to 1 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Dec 2025, 05:00 UTC≈1,590 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Imom Abu Homid Gʻazzoliy Xalil ibn Ahmaddan naql qilib aytadi: “Kishilar toʻrt xil boʻladi: - Bir kishi biladi va bilishini ham biladi, u olimdir, undan soʻranglar! - Bir kishi biladi, lekin bilishini bilmaydi, u unutuvchi, unga eslatinglar! - Bir kishi bilmaydi, lekin bilmasligini biladi, u johildir, unga oʻrgatinglar! - Bir kishi bilmaydi, lekin bilmasligini ham bilmaydi, u ahmoqdir, uni tark qilinglar”.

👍85

16 Nov 2025, 09:42 UTC≈2,650 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кимни имзолари?

1🔥1🤝1

10 Nov 2025, 15:51 UTC≈2,020 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @muhrim2022

O‘zbekistonda o‘g‘il bolalar ko‘proq tug‘ilayotgan ekan, kelajakda bu muammo bo’ladi, deyishyapti iqtisodchilar

3 Nov 2025, 13:20 UTC≈2,280 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2-qonun: Do‘stga ko‘p ishonmang, dushmandan foydalaning Mazmuni: Hokimiyat olamida eng katta xiyonat — ko‘pincha yaqinlardan keladi. Do‘stlar sizni his-tuyg‘u asosida baholaydi, sizga raqobatchi sifatida qaray boshlashi ham mumkin. Dushman esa, agar siz unga imkon bersangiz, o‘zini sodiq qilib ko‘rsatishga majbur bo‘ladi — chunki u o‘z obro‘sini tozalashni xohlaydi. Amaliy ma’no: • Ishda, loyihada yoki rahbarlikda

👍4🤝2🔥1

2 Nov 2025, 06:52 UTC≈1,720 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ChatGPT huquqiy, tibbiy va moliyaviy maslahat berishni to‘xtatadi OpenAI kompaniyasi sud mojarolaridan so‘ng qoidalarni yangiladi. Endi ChatGPT ishga joylashish, migratsiya, ta’lim, sug‘urta, moliya va davlat xizmatlari bo‘yicha maslahat bermaydi. “Siz litsenziyani talab qiladigan maxsus maslahatlar uchun bizning xizmatlarimizdan foydalana olmaysiz”, deyiladi OpenAI xabarida.

🤔3🔥2😢2

1 Nov 2025, 15:58 UTC≈1,900 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Qanday talaba ekanligingizni bilmoqchimisiz? Quyidagi promtni ChatGPTga yozing va savollariga javob bering. "Sen — ta'lim psixologiyasi, talabalar uchun kompetensiyalar va yondashuvlarni tahlil qilish bo'yicha mutaxassissan. Tasavvur qil, sen tajribali ta'lim inspektori va ta’lim olish bo'yicha ekspert sifatida talabaning ichki qobiliyat xaritasini tuzishing kerak. Vazifang - menga 15 ta savoldan iborat ketma-ket (

2🔥1

1 Nov 2025, 10:22 UTC≈39,200 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Pedagogik qobiliyatingizni bilmoqchimisiz? Unda ChatGPTga uchbu promptni yozing: "Sen — ta'lim psixologiyasi, pedagogik kompetensiyalar va kasbiy yondashuvlarni tahlil qilish bo'yicha mutaxassissan. Tasavvur qil, sen tajribali ta'lim inspektori va kadrlar bo'yicha ekspert sifatida o'qituvchining ichki qobiliyat xaritasini tuzishing kerak. Vazifang - menga 15 ta savoldan iborat ketma-ket (birvarakay emas) savollar be

🤝4👍2🫡1

1 Nov 2025, 10:02 UTC≈1,490 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ushbu iqtisodiy so‘rovnoma natijalari faqat ilmiy tadqiqot maqsadlarida qo‘llaniladi. Ishtirokchilarning shaxsiy ma’lumotlari maxfiy saqlanadi va javoblar faqat anonim tarzda tahlil qilinadi. Iltimos, so‘rovnomadagi savollarga to‘g‘ri va samimiy javob bering — bu bizga iqtisodiy jarayonlarni chuqurroq o‘rganishga yordam beradi. SO’ROVNOMADAN O’TISH

1 Nov 2025, 08:13 UTC≈1,390 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👑 1-qonun: Ustozingni soyada qoldirma Hokimiyat o‘yinida eng katta xato – o‘zingizni rahbaringizdan kuchliroq qilib ko‘rsatish. Nega bu xavfli? Agar rahbar (direktor, ustoz, homiy) o‘zini sizdan pastroq his qilsa, u sizni hamkor emas, raqib sifatida ko‘radi. Va raqibni u himoya qilmaydi – hujum qiladi. Nima qilish kerak? 1. Rahbaringiz g‘oyasini ommada siz kuchaytirib bering: “Bu tashabbus aslida rahbarimizniki, m

1😢1

1 Nov 2025, 07:35 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📘 FinFocus’da yangi rukn: “48 ta hokimiyat qonuni” Kuch — bu faqat lavozim yoki pul emas. Kuch — bu insonlarni, vaziyatni va qarorlarni tushunish qobiliyati. Robert Grinning mashhur “48 ta hokimiyat qonuni” asari endi FinFocus kanalida — tahlil, misollar va amaliy maslahatlar bilan. 🔹 Har bir qonunning mazmuni 🔹 Psixologik asoslari 🔹 O‘zbekiston sharoitidagi real qo‘llanilishi ⚠️ Bu kitob manipulyatsiya emas — bu

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fin_focus_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 396,721 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FinFocus” (@fin_focus_uz), 2,542 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fin_focus_uz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.