Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Женщина в праве

@moyechto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,013subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002058670909
TypeChannel
Username@moyechto
DescriptionАвторский канал Елены Богдановой , д.ю.н, профессора МГЮА Говорю о сложных юридических вопросах (семейных, жилищных и др.) просто, понятно и сохраняя оптимизм. Сотрудничество в ТГ: @Lenaprava
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/moyechto

Growth

6,0136,0186,015.57 August 2026 — 6,018 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,015 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,013 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,012–6,019 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 19:116,013-2
8 Aug 2026, 12:376,015-3
7 Aug 2026, 14:486,018first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 29 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.03%
avg views ÷ 6,013 subscribers
Avg views / post
423
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.861%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (29 May 202611 August 2026)
Views total5,494
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
291
Videos
189
Links
297

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 24s
Average length
1m 21s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2329.9%
🔥1823.4%
👏1418.2%
🤔1013.0%
😨911.7%
🤓33.90%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC144 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📁 Юриспруденция / Банкротство / Право Папка с полезными каналами по праву от практиков. Только актуальные новости, судебная практика и разбор реальных кейсов. Что внутри: — ⚖️ Банкротство (ФЛ/ИП/ООО): этапы, риски, сроки, расходы, защита активов — 💳 Долги и взыскание: работа приставов, аресты, ограничения, способы оспаривания — 🏛 Судебная практика: стратегии, доказательства, позиции Верховного суда — 🧾 Договоры и б

11 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC144 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Интересный вопрос возник по разделу имущества супругов и отступлению от принципа равенства долей (П. 2 ст. 39 СК)

  1. 1. Нет , не является11%
  2. 2. Да, является , так как надо учитывать интересы несовершеннолетних детей25%
  3. 3. Нет: интересы н/л детей не являются безусловным основанием отступить от равенства долей21%
  4. 4. В суд. практике сам по себе такой факт не рассматривается как основание отступления от равенства46%
  5. Свой ответ изложу в комментарии0%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC177 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Договор доверительного управления или договор поручения? Определяем подходящий вариант доверенности для управления имуществом осужденного, отбывающего наказание в местах лишения свободы - в нашем подкасте Рутуб Вк-видео

👍3

10 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC262 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

КС РФ о ПРЕДЕЛАХ ОСУЩЕСТВЛЕНИЯ РОДИТЕЛЯМИ ВОСПИТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ФУНКЦИИ (Определение от 28.05.2026 г.№ 1492-О) https://ksrf.ru/doc/KSRFDecision918749.pdf 🔻Недавно в Конституционном Суде РФ в рамках поступившей жалобы обсуждалась конституционность п. 1 ст 65 Семейного кодекса РФ,в соответствии с которой при осуществлении родительских прав родители не вправе причинять вред физическому и психическому здоровью детей, их нра

🤔2

5 Aug 2026, 03:23 UTC424 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @eaantonyan1975Video

Семейные отношения, когда партнер отбывает наказание в местах лишения свободы: выплата алиментов, вопрос сохранения семьи, отношения с детьми Разбираем в нашем подкасте Рутуб Вк-видео ✅ Я в MAX

🔥7

4 Aug 2026, 04:41 UTC471 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Очень сложная и запутанная история с семейными, наследственными вопросами осужденных лиц. Пытаемся разобраться с Е. А. Антонян. Пишите вопросы, если заинтересует Алименты с осуждённого. Как взыскать, если он не работает. 🔻Осуждённый человек не перестаёт быть человеком. У него остаются права и обязанности. 🔻Но реализовать их в колонии почти невозможно без помощи извне - Можно ли развестись в упрощённом порядке? -

👏2

2 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC486 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Возмездность и эквивалентность в гражданском праве с точки зрения справедливости 🔻Еще в 2016 году опубликовала статью « Возмездность и эквивалентность в гражданском праве Российской Федерации» (Е.Е. Богданова, журнал "Законодательство и экономика", N 5, май 2016 г.) https://base.garant.ru/57285459/ 🔻Радует то , что Верховный Суд применяет категорию «эквивалентности», говоря о добросовестности /недобросовестности

👏4

2 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC426 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Изменение порядка учета алиментов при назначении единого пособия 🔻С 1 марта 2026 года вступили в силу положения, которые меняют подход к определению суммы алиментов, учитываемой в качестве дохода семьи при определении права на единое пособие. 🔻1. Если родители договорились об алиментах устно или в нотариальном соглашении. Ранее минимальная сумма алиментов, которая учитывалась в доход семьи, зависела от минимально

👍3

28 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC549 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📁 ПАПКА, КОТОРАЯ СЭКОНОМИТ ДЕНЬГИ: Мы собрали в одну папку каналы, которые читают юристы, бухгалтеры и предприниматели, — чтобы вы узнавали о рисках ДО того, как они станут вашей проблемой: ⚖️ ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ — как обезопасить себя при заключении договора 💸 НАЛОГИ — законные возможности для экономии 🔥 БАНКРОТСТВО — как не остаться без имущества 🏠 НЕДВИЖИМОСТЬ — сделки без сюрпризов: проверяем, покупаем 🌍 ВЭД — и

👍3

28 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC490 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ВЗЫСКАНИЕ АЛИМЕНТОВ в 2026 г. : подходы судебной практики 🔻При рассмотрении споров о взыскании алиментов судебной практикой были сформированы следующие подходы: 📍1. Снижение алиментов при потере работы плательщика Однако сам факт утраты работы сам по себе не ведет к снижению алиментов. Необходимо доказать, что плательщик предпринимает активные усилия по трудоустройству, а не просто уклоняется от их уплаты. Если ж

👍3

23 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC659 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ЧТО ОЗНАЧАЕТ ЗАБЛУЖДЕНИЕ В СДЕЛКЕ ? 🔻Вынесенное недавно Верховным Судом определение по одному спору имеет все основания стать прецедентом, особенно в отношении таких инструментов как договор дарения и завещание между родственниками. ( Определение ВС РФ № 57-КГ26-5-К1 от 15.06.2026). 📌Суть спора : Яшина (мать) заключила договор дарения своей квартиры со своей дочерью Шальневой. Однако позднее потребовала признать е

😨9

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @moyechto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

Интересный вопрос возник по разделу имущества супругов и отступлению от принципа равенства долей (П. 2 ст. 39 СК)

  1. 1. Нет , не является11%
  2. 2. Да, является , так как надо учитывать интересы несовершеннолетних детей25%
  3. 3. Нет: интересы н/л детей не являются безусловным основанием отступить от равенства долей21%
  4. 4. В суд. практике сам по себе такой факт не рассматривается как основание отступления от равенства46%
  5. Свой ответ изложу в комментарии0%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Jun 2026, 15:26 UTCAnonymous Poll68 voters

На Ваш взгляд какое условие приобретения права собственности по ст. 234 ГК наиболее сложно обосновать ?

  1. 1. Добросовестность владения44%
  2. 2. Непрерывность владения имуществом18%
  3. 3. Открытость владения15%
  4. 4. Непонятно, что означает владение имуществом как «своим собственным»28%
  5. 5. Непонятно как исчисляются сроки в приобретательной давности16%
  6. 6. Свой вариант3%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 208,861 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Женщина в праве” (@moyechto), 6,013 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moyechto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.