Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net -1,038. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,939–24,292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 16:20
23,098
-15
7 Nov 2026, 09:47
23,113
+11
6 Nov 2026, 13:05
23,102
+7
5 Nov 2026, 13:59
23,095
-10
4 Nov 2026, 15:50
23,105
-7
3 Nov 2026, 17:06
23,112
-10
2 Nov 2026, 14:54
23,122
-24
1 Nov 2026, 13:45
23,146
-26
31 Oct 2026, 10:15
23,172
-10
30 Oct 2026, 08:46
23,182
-13
29 Oct 2026, 06:31
23,195
-7
28 Oct 2026, 07:44
23,202
-24
27 Oct 2026, 09:40
23,226
-19
26 Oct 2026, 08:01
23,245
-13
25 Oct 2026, 05:00
23,258
-11
24 Oct 2026, 05:46
23,269
-10
23 Oct 2026, 02:44
23,279
-11
21 Oct 2026, 23:47
23,290
-15
20 Oct 2026, 18:10
23,305
-6
19 Oct 2026, 20:06
23,311
first reading
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 23,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,520
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
75 (1 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
55,430
Reactions total
1,255
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 14:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,882 reactions across 75 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,752
63.8%
custom 5330148362450663357
588
10.00%
🔥
555
9.44%
😍
194
3.30%
❤🔥
181
3.08%
🥰
161
2.74%
👍
91
1.55%
😱
83
1.41%
🎉
78
1.33%
💘
62
1.05%
👀
52
0.884%
💔
38
0.646%
🦄
20
0.34%
🤷♀
11
0.187%
😢
7
0.119%
👏
5
0.085%
🐳
4
0.068%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,882 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 75 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @meow_teacher_meow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 75 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.67%
2 of 75 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,700
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,820
over 73 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjeJuWRy
1
4 October 2026
4 October 2026
2W5zFJiokxa
1
30 October 2026
30 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Есть особенная добрая атмосфера, которую невозможно почувствовать нигде, кроме школы🩷
Шумные перемены, звонкий детский смех, бесконечные разговоры в коридорах и сотни маленьких историй, которые происходят каждый день.
Иногда от этой энергии устаёшь так, что мечтаешь хотя бы о пяти минутах тишины😄
Наверное, в этом и есть особенная магия нашей профессии.
Мы приходим в школу учить детей, а они каждый день незаметно …
Да-да, я же не только для учеников придумываю всякие разные интересные материалы к урокам😄
Так получается, что я редко в блоге показываю свои «мамские» разработки, поскольку у меня уже давно проф. деформация… похоже🤪
Однако для Алисы я создаю гораздо больше разных развивашек, так как с ней я 24/7, а уроки веду лишь два раза в неделю)
Вот из совсем недавнего — это раскраски с Алисой и героями русских сказок и новог…
Друзья, к сожалению, в последнее время участились случаи использования моих фотографий в коммерческих целях.
Я ещё раз хочу вас предупредить и предостеречь от обмана⬇️
Я работаю в государственной школе учителем русского языка и литературы.
Я НЕ являюсь репетитором, НЕ набираю никакие группы и НЕ работала никогда в онлайн-школах.
Поэтому будьте, пожалуйста, внимательны🩷🙏🏼
Выбирать зимнюю обувь для ребёнка — это, кажется, отдельный вид родительского квеста😂
Хочется, чтобы Алисе было тепло, чтобы ножки оставались сухими, чтобы ничего не натирало и не мешало бегать, прыгать по сугробам и исследовать этот мир.
И, конечно, чтобы Алиса могла сама «справляться» с обувью, а сборы на прогулку не превращались в целое приключение🙈
Поэтому этой зимой я у бренда LASSIE приобрели вот такие розовы…
Картинки нашего утра☀️
Алису отправила в сад➡️Убралась➡️Создала стикеры с правилами➡️Приготовила обед
Теперь настроение: спать🤣
Но надо уже скоро идти за Алисой)))
Ну что ж, друзья, отдохнем на зимних каникулах😄
Адаптация в детском саду пройдена✅🙏🏼
Я считаю, что мы довольно плавно вошли в сад. Начинали с одного часа и постепенно (каждую неделю) увеличивали время пребывания.
Как только муж стал Алису отводить в сад — слёзы закончились🪄
За эти три недели у Алисы уже появились друзья😍 Она научилась очень многому за этот короткий период.
И самое главное, нам безумно повезло с воспитательницей! Именно благодаря её поддержке и…
Вчера выгрузила фотопост, где мельком показала уже начавшуюся подготовку к новогодним урокам))
Конечно, сразу получила вопрос, на который хочу ответить🩷
Безусловно, до НГ ещё далеко😄И создавать материалы к урокам, возможно, рановато.
НО!! Вы же меня знаете🤣
Я — человек творческий, у которого идей миллион. И если ко мне пришла в голову какая-то идея, то я стараюсь её как можно раньше «воплотить в жизнь», иначе пот…
Хочу поделиться с вами маленьким, но важным для меня событием🥹
В одной из моих социальных сетей ЮБИЛЕЙ🩷🎉🎊
Это событие оказалось для меня действительно невероятным, поэтому я даже заранее забронировала фотостудию, заказала огромный торт и купила зефирное платье, потому что мне хотелось создать максимально воздушный и нежный образ🎀🩷💅
Поскольку за всеми моими серьезным ролями: жены, мамы, учителя, ИП… Скрывается та с…
Я часто делюсь полезными материалами для уроков русского языка и литературы. Принесла вам, коллеги, новый способ подготовки к урокам, набирающий огромную популярность в России)
Авторский метод позволяет учителям-словесникам значительно снизить нагрузку и увеличить эффективность работы. Можно высвободить драгоценное время на себя (наконец-то)! Создала новую методику Валерия Добронравова – учитель русского языка и лит…
❤15custom 53301483624506633571
Signed Екатерина Чеботарева
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @meow_teacher_meow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @meow_teacher_meow as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
1 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Варенички @varenikivtelege · 29,843 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 7 September 2026
❤️🔥istinaglagolova Life❤️🔥 @istinaglagolova · 41,235 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
Алена и Марк @alena_ily · 23,011 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 September 2026
ISTOR.ICHKA @istor_ichka · 29,983 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Meow_teacher_meow” (@meow_teacher_meow), 23,098 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meow_teacher_meow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
