10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +1,775. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 87,000–89,307 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 12:26
89,041
+556
16 Aug 2026, 01:53
88,485
+334
14 Aug 2026, 10:07
88,151
+249
13 Aug 2026, 00:53
87,902
+318
12 Aug 2026, 01:33
87,584
+225
11 Aug 2026, 02:41
87,359
+16
10 Aug 2026, 04:46
87,343
+6
9 Aug 2026, 02:51
87,337
+41
8 Aug 2026, 05:51
87,296
+30
7 Aug 2026, 13:02
87,266
first reading
Engagement
131 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 89,041 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,800
131 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.864%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
131
of 131 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
131 (5 August 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
1,283,740
Reactions total
11,091
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
11,091 reactions across 131 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,731
42.7%
👍
1,380
12.4%
🖕
1,232
11.1%
🤣
1,201
10.8%
🙏
916
8.26%
👏
446
4.02%
💔
256
2.31%
😍
235
2.12%
👎
218
1.97%
👌
162
1.46%
🤬
128
1.15%
🤡
40
0.361%
😭
35
0.316%
💘
29
0.261%
🤔
24
0.216%
🤯
21
0.189%
💋
13
0.117%
🎉
7
0.063%
🤨
7
0.063%
🔥
6
0.054%
2 further kinds
4
0.036%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 131 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,091reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مشخصات دریافت شبکه معاند🤬 ایران اینترنشنال در جهتهای مختلف
آخرین بروزرسانی
🌐 Iran International
(بروزرسانی: 26_5_1405 )
🟢 53.0°E Express AM6
12594 V 27500
🟢 52.0°E TurkmenÄlem/MonacoSat
11420 V 27500
🟢 26.0°E Badr 8
11785 V 27500
🟢 26.0°E Badr 8
12265 H 30000
🟢 13.0°E Hotbird 13G
11137 H 27500
🟢 13.0°E Hotbird 13G
11373 H 27500
🟢 7.0°E Eutelsat 7C
11285 V 30000
🟢 7.0°E Eutelsat 7C
11410 V 30000
🟢 8.0…
شبکه های ماهواره ترکست باتوجه به اینکه ماهواره جدید جایگزین شده
و برخلاف تغییرات در ماهواره های دیگر که بعد از جایگزینی تغییرات اندکی صورت میگرفت کاربران عادی اصلا متوجه نمی شدند
این تغییر بسیار زیاد بوده
و ابتدا باید کل شبکه های ماهواره ترکست را پاک کنید و سپس در قسمت جستجو پیشرفته را انتخاب کنید
تا فرکانسهای جدید جایگزین شده و سرچ این فرکانسها انجام شود
این فرکانسها به ثبات کامل نرسیده اگر مشکل دریافت ب…
⛔افت دوباره کیفیت اینترنت در ایران؛ داده های فنی از کاهش سطح اتصال کشور خبر میدهند😫
▪️طی روزهای اخیر، گزارشهای زیادی از کندی، قطعی و ناپایداری اینترنت در نقاط مختلف کشور منتشر شده و دادههای فنی هم نشان میدهند شرایط هنوز با یک اینترنت عادی فاصله دارد.
▪️علاوه بر گزارش های متعدد کاربران که نشان از افت محسوس کیفیت اینترنتشان دارد ؛ داده های Cloudflare هم نشان میدهد بعد از پایان خاموشی 88 روزه ، ترافیک HTTP ایران بر…
سرویس EPG
برای تعدادی از شبکه های سراسری صدا و سیما در ماهواره های بدر و تایکام فعال شد.
👈 مخصوص عزیزان دوستدار سریالهای تکــــــــــــراری صداو سیمای جمهوری اسلامی ایران 👉
@Mahvarehsat
EPG
مخفف Electronic Program Guide یا راهنمای برنامههای الکترونیکی است.
در رسیور، این همان جدول برنامههای ماهواره ای هستش که روی صفحه تلویزیون میبینید
این یک منوی دیجیتال است که اطلاعات پخش شبکهها را به صورت منظم نشان می…
💥جهت یادآوری مجــــــــــدد💥
باتوجه به سوال بسیار زیاد و مکرر همراههان کانال
🟢✅🟢✅🟢✅🟢✅🟢✅🟢✅🟢✅
شبکه معاند 🤬 ایران اینترنشنال
با نام IITV در فرکانس 12594 ماهواره اکسپرس(همجهتیاهست) روی ایر رفت.
برای دریافت شبکه ایران اینترنشنال
باید نسخه قبلی این شبکه را از رسیور خود حذف کنید و مجددا فرکانس جستجو کنید تا شبکه را دریافت کنید.
ایران اینترنشنال هماکنون با نام IITV در فرکانس زیر قابل دریافت می باشد.
✅ExperssAM…
❤52🤣20👍5🖕4
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @mahvarehsat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mahvarehsat edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 46,529 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
FREESAT @freesat · 124,133 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
MahvareTeam | ماهواره تیم @MahvareTeam · 179,737 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Satellites Last News @satlastnews · 165,750 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⛔جدیدترین فرکانسها و خبرهای ماهواره ⛔” (@mahvarehsat), 89,041 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mahvarehsat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.