Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 14 of the 14 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 825 comparable posts for this entry, running 8 August 2026 to 19 September 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 92 days, net -59,086. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 09:38
158
+26
2 Nov 2026, 12:09
132
+50
26 Oct 2026, 13:30
82
+31
19 Oct 2026, 10:31
51
+11
11 Oct 2026, 22:41
40
+25
30 Sept 2026, 11:37
15
-58,452
18 Sept 2026, 06:20
58,467
-144
16 Sept 2026, 03:18
58,611
-17
14 Sept 2026, 08:20
58,628
+1
12 Sept 2026, 18:01
58,627
-9
10 Sept 2026, 16:01
58,636
-38
7 Sept 2026, 13:40
58,674
-107
4 Sept 2026, 19:21
58,781
+14
3 Sept 2026, 01:35
58,767
-26
1 Sept 2026, 22:04
58,793
-16
31 Aug 2026, 21:33
58,809
-97
30 Aug 2026, 19:04
58,906
+25
29 Aug 2026, 18:19
58,881
+23
28 Aug 2026, 21:08
58,858
-41
28 Aug 2026, 00:24
58,899
first reading
Engagement
896 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 896 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3h 00m
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 263 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
36,039 reactions across 893 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11,104
30.8%
😢
6,486
18.0%
🤬
5,017
13.9%
😱
4,215
11.7%
😁
3,122
8.66%
👍
2,953
8.19%
🙏
2,341
6.50%
👎
801
2.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 893 of the 896 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36,039 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 896 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 896 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lviv_nw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 896 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 August 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всім мирної ночі! Підготували для вас добірку головних новин дня:
💥 Смертельна ДТП на Львівщині, є також постраждалі
👀 Обстановка на Воробкевича: питань більше ніж відповідейїй
❗️ Жінка впала в колодязь у Львові
👀 Колись новини у Львові виглядали ось так
🤯 Унікальне «мертве» озеро з плавучим озером на Львівщині
😱 14-річна дівчина загинула в ДТП на Львівщині, інша — у лікарні
Надсилайте нам фото/відео/інформаці…
😱 14-річна дівчина загинула в ДТП на Львівщині, інша — у лікарні
Смертельна ДТП сталася близько 20:20 у селі Бутини Шептицького району. Водій Renault наїхав на двох 14-річних дівчат, які йшли краєм дороги.
Одна з дівчат загинула на місці, іншу госпіталізували.
За попередніми даними, 50-річний водій був тверезий. Його затримали, поліція відкрила кримінальне провадження.
Надсилайте нам фото/відео/інформацію ➡️ @lvi…
❤️ Казкові персонажі сьогодні керували трамваями у Львові
Водії переодягнулися в костюми відомих персонажів в рамках фестивалю дошкілля.
Надсилайте нам фото/відео/інформацію ➡️ @lviv24x7_bot
🇺🇦 ЛС: новини Львів
👀 Колись новини у Львові виглядали ось так
Газета «Українські вісти». Львів, 1936 рік.
Надсилайте нам фото/відео/інформацію ➡️ @lviv24x7_bot
🇺🇦 ЛС: новини Львів
❗️ Кишенькового злодія затримали після крадіжки гаманця
На вулиці Смаль-Стоцького 35-річний львів’янин, за даними поліції, витягнув із сумки 42-річної мешканки Городка гаманець.
Знайти підозрюваного вдалося за допомогою камер відеоспостереження «Безпечна Львівщина». Поліцейські встановили його місцеперебування та затримали.
За крадіжку чоловікові загрожує від 5 до 8 років ув’язнення.
Надсилайте нам фото/відео/інф…
❗️ Жінка впала в колодязь у Львові
Жінка опинилася в колодязі та не могла самостійно вибратися. На допомогу прибули рятувальники ДСНС, які підняли її на поверхню та передали медикам.
На щастя, обійшлося без тяжких травм.
Надсилайте нам фото/відео/інформацію ➡️ @lviv24x7_bot
🇺🇦 ЛС: новини Львів
🚒 Вночі спалахнув житловий будинок: жінку госпіталізували
Пожежа сталася 19 вересня близько 02:34 у селі Боянець Шептицького району. Вогонь охопив домашні речі, дерев’яне перекриття та стіни будинку.
Внаслідок пожежі жінка отруїлася продуктами горіння. Її госпіталізували до лікарні Святого Пантелеймона у Львові.
О 03:22 рятувальники повністю ліквідували займання.
Надсилайте нам фото/відео/інформацію ➡️ @lviv24x7_b…
👀 Обстановка на Воробкевича: питань більше ніж відповідейїй
Надсилайте нам фото/відео/інформацію ➡️ @lviv24x7_bot
🇺🇦 ЛС: новини Львів
😱21👍4❤1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 896 posts we hold for @lviv_nw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Якби вибори президента України відбулися сьогодні, за кого ви би віддали свій голос?
Володимир Зеленський20%
Валерій Залужний4%
Михайло Федоров10%
Кирило Буданов28%
Ігор Терехов7%
Андрій Білецький1%
Сергій Притула1%
Дмитро Разумков4%
Юлія Тимошенко21%
Петро Порошенко4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 896 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 19 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Львів | Зберігай локацію! @lviv_location · 37,976 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
Львів Сьогодні @lviv_svitlo · 115,623 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Львів Повістки @holovni_Lviv · 127,542 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
Новини Львова ⚡️ | Visti Lviv @lviv_visti · 44,481 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 August 2026
Типовий Львів @lvivtp · 232,633 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Львів. Оперативно @lvivVScoronavirus · 27,015 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Суспільне Львів @suspilnelviv · 71,656 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Львівський дощ @lviving · 21,376 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 September 2026
Львів⚡️Незламний @lviv_nez · 30,843 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
VARTA1 Львів Львівщина @varta1 · 57,641 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Львів | Новини | LEMBERG @lviv_lmbrg · 68,066 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
🩵 Femheart 💙 @zahidwtf_official · 166 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
‼️РАКЕТНА НЕБЕЗПЕКА ЛЬВІВ🚀⛔️ @RAKETNANEBESPEKA · 46,877 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Львівський купол @lviv_raketna · 86,579 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Андрій Садовий @andriysadovyi · 85,995 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Труха⚡️Львів @lvivtruexa · 340,732 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Львів 24/7 🟢 @lviv_24x7 · 64,453 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
Оренда від Віктора @orendakvartyr_ua · 47,069 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
ЗАХІД УКРАЇНИ @zahid_novyny · 75,820 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Львів ⚡️Новини @lviv_insider · 54,785 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Оповіщення ЦЗ @dczloda · 344,574 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
🇺🇦 Максим Козицький/Львівська ОВА (ОДА) @kozytskyy_maksym_official · 133,868 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
ЧОРНИЙ ЛИСТ @blacknews_ukr · 190,821 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Львівич | Новини @lvivych_news · 458,286 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“lviv_nw” (@lviv_nw), 158 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lviv_nw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.