Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Effetti collaterali

Channel

Effetti collaterali

@effetticollaterali

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,371subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001339376222
TypeChannel
Username@effetticollaterali
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/effetticollaterali

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,3715,4255,3987 August 2026 — 5,425 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,424 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,418 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,415 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,409 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,404 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,399 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,398 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,392 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,388 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,383 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,371 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,363–5,433 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:175,371-12
12 Sept 2026, 03:205,383-5
7 Sept 2026, 22:375,388-4
30 Aug 2026, 18:285,392-6
27 Aug 2026, 22:465,398-1
24 Aug 2026, 23:265,399-5
20 Aug 2026, 23:475,404-5
17 Aug 2026, 13:145,409-6
14 Aug 2026, 01:565,415-3
10 Aug 2026, 14:025,418-6
7 Aug 2026, 11:545,424-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:155,425first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 53 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29m 51s
Average length
2m 29s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC151 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bordernightsVideo

Il governo neozelandese ha ordinato l'incendio di massa di alveari perfettamente sani, compiendo un attacco scioccante all'approvvigionamento alimentare. Le autorità stanno costringendo brutalmente gli apicoltori a bruciare vivi i loro alveari. Citazioni di apicoltori: "Ci è stato ordinato di bruciare alveari sani e forti." "Guardate quanto sono sani questi alveari." Le api impollinano un terzo del cibo mondiale e

11 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC132 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

A SPASSO PER LA FIERA DI SHANGHAI TI PRESENTIAMO IL ROBOT UMANOIDE AWE 2026, TOTALMENTE AUTONOMO MENTRE MUSK PRODUCE BARATTOLI SMART LA CINA E SEMPRE PIÙ VICINA ALLE SEMBIANZE UMANE E MODELLI DI IA AVANZATISSIMI AVANTI DI ALMENO 5 ANNI #ROBOT #CINA #AWE2026

11 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC345 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Mercoledì 12 agosto l’Europa sarà interessata dalla prima eclissi solare totale dal 1999, con la fascia di totalità che attraverserà l’Islanda, la Spagna settentrionale e le Isole Baleari. Dall’Italia il fenomeno sarà visibile come eclissi parziale, anche se con percentuali di oscuramento comunque notevoli, che supereranno il 90% in molte località del Centro-Nord e in Sardegna. L’appuntamento sarà poco prima del tra

10 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC320 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @imolaoggi

Sindaco Ceuta: "Internare i migranti per ristabilire l'ordine" https://www.imolaoggi.it/2026/08/10/sindaco-ceuta-internare-migranti-ristabilire-ordine/

10 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC332 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @radiogreginfo

QUANDO CI VUOLE CI VUOLE 😂😂😂 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Db0iHtQI9j_/?igsh=bXQxZWM5ZmlneGdw

10 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC396 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Rappresentazione grafica del "cambiamento climatico" e del "caldo anomalo". 👀

10 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC382 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ultimoraPhoto

Colombia 🇨🇴, terremoto di magnitudo 7.4: almeno 21 morti. Edifici crollati e bambini sotto le macerie di un ospedale a Cali. 📰 @ultimora

10 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC954 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Qua siamo tutti morti, vi scriviamo dall'Aldilà. 🤣😬 #lostudio #lascienza Iscriviti ad @effetticollaterali

9 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC407 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @imolaoggi

Berlino vuole inviarci i migranti: il piano di Merz https://www.imolaoggi.it/2026/08/09/berlino-vuole-inviarci-i-migranti/

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @effetticollaterali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTCAnonymous Poll72 voters

Quale destino è più appropriato per l'Eroe Giuseppe Conte per aver servito la Repubblica Italiano durante il periodo di falsa pandemica?

  1. Dargli onorificenze pubbliche con lauti compensi economici.3%
  2. Tutti coloro che sono stati salvati aprono un fondo a suo favore con contributo minino 100€.6%
  3. Carcere a vita.64%
  4. Pubblica lapidazione.18%
  5. sbudellamento in pubblica pizza.7%
  6. Un colpo alla testa e via.11%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

RADIOGREG.info - SOLO PER LO 0.3% ☄☄☄
@radiogreginfo · 22,126
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 September 2026
Danni Collaterali
@dannicollateralivaccinocovid · 28,877
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Effetti collaterali” (@effetticollaterali), 5,371 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/effetticollaterali.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.