Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Европейский 🚂 ПаровозЪ

@lokoeurostat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,025subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001559331614
TypeChannel
Username@lokoeurostat
Created23 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lokoeurostat

Growth

3,0163,0253,020.56 August 2026 — 3,016 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,016 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,019 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,025 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,015–3,026 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:543,025+6
9 Aug 2026, 12:023,019+3
6 Aug 2026, 11:023,016no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:543,016first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.3%
avg views ÷ 3,025 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,190
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held15 (8 May 202628 July 2026)
Views total6,560
Reactions total377
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 46s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,417 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯46833.0%
custom 522465312945841024338227.0%
19613.8%
🔥926.49%
😁704.94%
custom 5249024345853951300624.38%
custom 5249428854463824907483.39%
👍241.69%
custom 5224456823683178492231.62%
👎211.48%
custom 5224603200463592122130.917%
🤔80.565%
🙈60.423%
🙏40.282%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,417reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lokoeurostat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,970 views184 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😵‍💫Карпукас в «Локо» – похоже, всё. Дождёмся объяснений от Ротенберга? Динамика последних инсайдов и высказываний не оставляет сомнений: история Карпукаса в «Локо» де-факто завершена. Переговоры о продлении остановлены, а с «Зенитом» активированы, Карпукас печально говорит об «общем знаменателе» с кЛубом. 1. Исход этой саги, хоть и внешне напоминает переход Баринова в ЦСКА, но всё же сильно отличается. «Локо» не ро

💯14415🔥10custom 52246531294584102437custom 52490243458539513005😁2👎1

22 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC≈2,270 views104 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚂 Топ-11 ожиданий от нового сезона «Локомотива» На самом деле это что-то среднее между хотелками и ожиданиями, но ничего нереального - вполне достижимые цели. Правда же? 1. «Локо» выиграет Кубок России 2. «Локо» удержится в топ-3 РПЛ 3. Раков забьет 10+ голов 4. Батраков все-таки уедет в топ-лигу 5. Карпукас подпишет новый контракт с кЛубом 6. Пиняев проведет яркий сезон без травм 7. В основе закрепится хотя бы оди

custom 522465312945841024378custom 522460320046359212213custom 5249428854463824907103

22 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC≈2,320 views89 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👍 Ну что, обсудим форму «Локо»? 1. Эмблема – кайф, очень радует, что после экспериментального четвертого комплекта в прорывном по дизайну сезоне 2024/25 последовало развитие идеи – и теперь гениально минималистичное лого добралось до основных комплектов! Это и современно выглядит, и одновременно является отсылкой к ретро-формам кЛуба – полный вин-вин. 2. Формы 2001 и 1999 годов, которыми, судя по всему, вдохновляли

custom 522465312945841024357💯17custom 524942885446382490783👎3👍1

12 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC≈3,230 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

❤️ Останутся ли в «Локо» Батраков и Карпукас – один из главных вопросов этого лета. В новом выпуске кЛубного подкаста «Попутчики» при поддержке BetBoom оба высказались о своем будущем и не только. «Если останусь в «Локомотиве», я буду очень счастлив», - сказал Артём. И как же хочется, чтобы Карпукас был счастлив вместе с нами! А вообще сразу 7 гостей в выпуске – это отличная возможность посмотреть глазами игроков «Л

🔥245custom 52494288544638249073custom 52246531294584102432

16 Jun 2026, 08:16 UTC≈3,640 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤙 Вадим Раков позвонил Возинье после переподписания контракта с «Локо» ⚽️🇨🇻 Успели поговорить во время перерыва на водопой!

31😁16custom 52246531294584102435

12 Jun 2026, 00:47 UTC≈3,710 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚂⚽️След «Локо» на ЧМ-2026: от Монтеса и Чорлуки до финалиста ЛЧ За кого болеть и за кем следить на ЧМ? 1248 футболиста – это вам не шутки. Но 9 из них нам роднее остальных (ну ладно, некоторые сильно с натяжкой, но всё же), потому что так или иначе были связаны с «Локо». Кто-то – напрямую, другие же так и остались трансферными байками в контексте кЛуба. Вот все они (плюс два тренера): Группа А 🇲🇽Мексика: Сесар Монт

🔥328😁6custom 52246531294584102435custom 52494288544638249072

11 Jun 2026, 17:02 UTC≈2,230 views132 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

🥉 мысли о третьем месте «Локо» Вот я и проснулся! Пока ЧМ-2026 не перетянул ваше внимание на себя и не устроил вам дикий недосып матчами всяческих Кюрасао, Гаити и Кабо-Верде, подведу-таки свои итоги сезона. Сезона важного во многих смыслах и противоречивого – поэтому, думаю, даже хорошо, что уже можно посмотреть на него без лишних эмоций. 1. Бронза - это всё же достижение. Не все поняли счастливые улыбки и «бронзо

💯81custom 52246531294584102432314👍7custom 52494288544638249075🤔1custom 52490243458539513001

8 Jun 2026, 20:07 UTC≈2,500 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🧤Гиля – идеальный гость для подкаста про «Локо». Поэтому неудивительно, что «Попутчики» доехали до того, чтобы из соведущего сделать его героем. В итоге получился один из самых фактурных выпусков за всё время. От деталей переезда в Россию до впечатлений от Ньясса, Ману Фернандеша и Левенца. Куча рассказов про Сёмина, которого Гиля очень реалистично изображает, и, конечно, история, как он чуть не перешёл в «Спартак» –

23custom 52246531294584102438👍4custom 52494288544638249073

1 Jun 2026, 14:02 UTC≈4,130 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👽Дальше можно не читать. Инсайды - это хорошо, но документам из налоговой как-то верится больше. Перед кем у «Локо» этот миллиардный долг? Перед банком? Открываем бухгалтерские отчёты кЛуба за последние три года (2023-2025), в них ровно ноль банковских кредитов у «Локо». Были дополнительные вливания и аванс от РЖД, но с банками уже давненько ни-ни. Более того, уже в который раз ВОТ СКРИН из пояснений к отчетности з

37custom 522465312945841024317🤔7custom 52494288544638249074🙈1

17 May 2026, 21:50 UTC≈3,760 views219 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @alexander_poydaVideo

Локомотив должен одну медаль Евсееву отправить

custom 522465312945841024312650💯23custom 524942885446382490711🔥9

17 May 2026, 17:05 UTC≈4,150 views187 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👏 Как ни крути, это максимально галактионовская бронза! 🚂@lokoeurostat

💯116custom 524902434585395130044👎13😁7custom 52244568236831784924🙈2custom 52246531294584102431

15 May 2026, 19:37 UTC≈3,650 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🏟 L’ONE все же выступит на «РЖД-Арене»! Ждем его концерт следующим летом! Такую классную новость принес новый выпуск кЛубного подкаста «Попутчики» при поддержке BetBoom. Леван – большой поклонник «Локо» и крайне важно, что после былых недопониманий он снова полноценно медийно возвращается в красно-зеленую семью. L’ONE еще много чего рассказал в этом ролике, и каждая его история пронизана глубокой любовью к кЛубу. И

custom 522465312945841024334🔥164🙈3👎2custom 52494288544638249072

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lokoeurostat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 878,538 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Европейский 🚂 ПаровозЪ” (@lokoeurostat), 3,025 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lokoeurostat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.