Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Live Law

Channel

Live Law

@livelawindia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,774subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001384576422
TypeChannel
Username@livelawindia
Created1 February 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/livelawindia

Growth

38,73538,77438,754.56 August 2026 — 38,740 subscribers6 August 2026 — 38,741 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,736 subscribers9 August 2026 — 38,744 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38,735 subscribers11 August 2026 — 38,746 subscribers11 August 2026 — 38,752 subscribers12 August 2026 — 38,743 subscribers14 August 2026 — 38,761 subscribers15 August 2026 — 38,774 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,729–38,780 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:2238,774+13
14 Aug 2026, 01:1738,761+18
12 Aug 2026, 18:2438,743-9
11 Aug 2026, 21:5238,752+6
11 Aug 2026, 01:0138,746+11
10 Aug 2026, 04:2638,735-9
9 Aug 2026, 05:5138,744+8
8 Aug 2026, 02:3338,736-5
6 Aug 2026, 23:5738,741+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:4538,740first reading

Engagement

316 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.634%
avg views ÷ 38,774 subscribers
Avg views / post
246
316 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.625%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
316
of 316 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 316 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held316 (6 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total77,718
Reactions total76
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 38 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2330.3%
1418.4%
🔥79.21%
👎67.89%
🤡67.89%
🤣67.89%
😁45.26%
🌚11.32%
👏11.32%
💅11.32%
💯11.32%
🖕11.32%
😡11.32%
🙊11.32%
🤔11.32%
🤷‍♀11.32%
🤷‍♂11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 316 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 316 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC103 viewsread 15 August 2026

Promotion Doesn't Wash Out Past Adverse Entries, Full Service Record Relevant For Compulsory Retirement: Allahabad High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-high-court-promotion-adverse-entries-entire-service-record-compulsory-retirement-545927

15 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC199 viewsread 15 August 2026

Courts Must Strictly Follow 45-Day Timeline Under BNSS For Disposal Of Seized Property: Karnataka High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/karnataka-high-court/karnataka-high-court-strictly-follow-45day-timeline-bnss-disposal-of-seized-property-545925

15 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC261 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Allahabad High Court Raises Concern Over School Bus Drivers With Adverse Police Reports After Alleged Incidents Of Sexual Harassment Of Children https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-high-court-inspection-schools-verification-of-inspecting-staff-credentials-545924

15 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC264 viewsread 15 August 2026

Petrol Pump Owner Has No Locus To Challenge Approval To Rival Outlet Merely Due To Business Competition: Allahabad High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-hc-petrol-pump-owner-locus-rival-outlet-noc-business-competition-545960

15 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC275 viewsread 15 August 2026

Allahabad High Court Orders 30% Women's Reservation In Oudh Bar Association; President's Post Reserved From 2028 On Rotation Basis https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-hc-30-percent-women-reservation-oudh-bar-association-president-2028-545958

15 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC261 viewsread 15 August 2026

Zamindari Abolition Act | Land Claims Must Be Decided On Entire Chain Of Revenue Records, Not Isolated Entry: Allahabad High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-high-court-s229b-decided-entire-chain-revenue-entries-545914

15 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC226 viewsread 15 August 2026

Does Banker's Books Evidence Bill, 2026 Meet Constitutional Demands Of Privacy And Electronic Evidence? https://www.livelaw.in/articles/banker-books-evidence-bill2026-privacy-electronic-evidence-545838

15 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC260 viewsread 15 August 2026

CJI Surya Kant Highlights Lawyers' Role In Freedom Struggle, Says Legal Fraternity Must Keep Constitutional Promise Alive https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/cji-surya-kant-highlights-lawyers-role-in-freedom-struggle-says-legal-fraternity-must-keep-constitutional-promise-alive-545953

15 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC284 viewsread 15 August 2026

Allottee Who Knowingly Took Lease Of Lesser Area Can't Claim Benefit Of Zero Period In Entirety: Allahabad High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-high-court-allottee-knowingly-took-lease-lesser-area-claim-benefit-of-zero-period-545907

15 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC249 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Plea In Supreme Court Seeks Term Limit For Bar Council Chairperson, Review Of BCI's Functioning https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/plea-in-supreme-court-seeks-term-limit-for-bar-council-chairperson-review-of-bcis-functioning-545945

👍2

15 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC255 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Hamirpur 'Gen Alpha' Students Walk 5 Km To Protest Lack Of Road To School; Allahabad High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/hamirpur-gen-alpha-students-walk-5-km-school-road-allahabad-hc-suo-motu-cognizance-545943

👍2

15 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC258 viewsread 15 August 2026

Former SC Judge Moves Supreme Court Against Rajasthan HC Calling Tribunal Headed By Him 'Lethargic', Reducing Arbitral Fee https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-jvvnl-hcl-discoms-528-crore-dispute-ex-sc-judge-plea-against-hc-order-calling-tribunal-lethargic-reducing-fee-545938

Showing the 12 most recent of 316 posts we hold for @livelawindia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,285,666 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Indian Express
@indianexpress · 122,399
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
The Hindu
@THnewsupdates · 248,761
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Live Law” (@livelawindia), 38,774 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/livelawindia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.