🚀 *Join our 1 Million Club! Stay Updated. Stay Ahead. Stay Empowered* ⚠️ One wrong tax decision can cost lakhs. 3M+ professionals don’t take that risk — they rely on Taxscan. No noise. No guesswork. Clear impact. Clear action. 🚀 Taxscan Premium gives you: ✔ Latest Income Tax, GST & Corporate Law updates ✔ Expert-decoded judgments & amendments ✔ Practical impact analysis & compliance insights ✔ Notifications, circ…

Channel
Taxscan
@taxscan_in
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,833subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001476232747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @taxscan_in |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/taxscan_in |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 4,833 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 4,846 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 4,849 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:09 | 4,852 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 4,855 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 4,859 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 4,863 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 4,867 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 4,867 | first reading |
Engagement
79 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.09%
- avg views ÷ 4,833 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 52.6
- 79 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 79
- of 79 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 79 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,158 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Constitutional Challenge to GST Provision Requires Proof of Violation of Constitutional Mandate: Delhi HC [Read Order] https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/constitutional-challenge-to-gst-provision-requires-proof-of-violation-of-constitutional-mandate-delhi-hc-1449887
Chhattisgarh HC Grants Bail to Tax Consultant Accused of Misusing Client's KYC Documents to Create Shell Entities, Obtain Unauthorised Loans [Read Order] https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/chhattisgarh-hc-grants-bail-to-tax-consultant-accused-of-misusing-clients-kyc-documents-to-create-shell-entities-obtain-unauthorised-loans-1449886
SC grants Rs. 11 Crore Service Tax Relief to Diebold, Refuses to Split ATM Installation Services from Supply [Read Judgement] https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/sc-grants-rs-11-crore-service-tax-relief-to-diebold-refuses-to-split-atm-installation-services-from-supply-1449885
Advocates vs CA, CMA, CS: Delhi HC Seeks ICSI’s Affidavit on Authority to Prescribe 26 Areas of Practice including areas of Law [Read Order] https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/advocates-vs-ca-cma-cs-delhi-hc-seeks-icsis-affidavit-on-authority-to-prescribe-26-areas-of-practice-including-areas-of-law-1449883
GST Officer’s ‘Misleading Court’ Remarks show Prejudice against Taxpayer: Allahabad HC quashes Notice demanding Rs. 5.76 Cr against HCL [Read Order] https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/gst-officers-misleading-court-remarks-show-prejudice-against-taxpayer-allahabad-hc-quashes-notice-demanding-rs-576-cr-against-hcl-1449882
❗️ *EXCLUSIVE OFFER ENDS SOON* 🎓 *LIVE MASTER CLASS ON CUSTOMS ACT & FTP* Master the Customs Act & Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) with expert-led practical insights. *👉 Register Now:* 🔗 https://academy.taxscan.in/course/live-master-class-on-customs-act-and-ftp/?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=customs-b4 📌 *What You’ll Learn:* ✅ Customs Act & FTP 2023 ✅ Product Classification & HSN ✅ Import & Expo…
AO Taxed LTCG at 20% Rate, Not 22%: Delhi HC Finds CIT(A), ITAT Proceeded on Wrong Facts, Sets Aside Declaration of Law [Read Order] https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/ao-taxed-ltcg-at-20-rate-not-22-delhi-hc-finds-cita-itat-proceeded-on-wrong-facts-sets-aside-declaration-of-law-1449878
GNOIDA Not 'Government', No Adverse Action for Non-Deduction of TDS on Lease Rent Where Authority Insisted Otherwise: Delhi HC [Read Order] https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/gnoida-not-government-no-adverse-action-for-non-deduction-of-tds-on-lease-rent-where-authority-insisted-otherwise-delhi-hc-1449877
GST SCN Limitation Deadlines approaching for FY 2020-21 and FY 2022-23: What Taxpayers Need to Know https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/gst-scn-limitation-deadlines-approaching-for-fy-2020-21-and-fy-2022-23-what-taxpayers-need-to-know-1449875
Lok Sabha Approves Tribunals Reforms Bill 2026, National Commission to Oversee Tribunal Appointments [Read Bill Number] https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/lok-sabha-approves-tribunals-reforms-bill-2026-national-commission-to-oversee-tribunal-appointments-read-bill-number-1449874
CIT(A) Must Decide Whether TDS on CAM Charges 2% u/s 194C or 10% u/s 194-I Applies, Cannot Proceed on Erroneous Facts: ITAT [Read Order] https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/cita-must-decide-whether-tds-on-cam-charges-2-us-194c-or-10-us-194-i-applies-cannot-proceed-on-erroneous-facts-1449873
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @taxscan_in. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fintaxpro · 40,994
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
@livelawindia · 38,843
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
@theicai · 104,778
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
@ManikondaKarthik · 36,641
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
@CARishabhJain · 69,371
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@cafinalsankalpcosting · 55,976
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Taxscan” (@taxscan_in), 4,833 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taxscan_in.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.