Channel
@scobserverupdates
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
5,016subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001596541118 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scobserverupdates |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scobserverupdates |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 5,016 | +13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 5,003 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 5,001 | +14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 4,987 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 4,984 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 4,975 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 4,975 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (10 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,888 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌄 Good Morning! 👨⚖️ The Justice Yashwant Varma Inquiry Report is scheduled to be tabled in Parliament today. The Committee had submitted its report to Speaker Om Birla on 18 May: https://bit.ly/4ulztPD 📬 The latest issue of the Supreme Court Observer Law Reports (SCO.LR) brings you five notable judgements from last week: https://bit.ly/4g97oFt 🗂️ The 2026 Report on Gender and Sensitivity promises practical traini…
🌼 Good morning! 📬 Our latest issue of the Supreme Court Observer Law Reports (SCO.LR) features five important judgements from 3 to 8 August 2026. Read: https://bit.ly/4g97oFt ♀️ Our newsletter examines whether the Supreme Court’s latest Report on gender-sensitive judging can help combat gender stereotypes and prevent them from distorting judicial outcomes. Read: https://bit.ly/4fM6P5s 🌐 On 7 August, the Supreme Co…
🌞 Good morning! ⚖️ Our commentary examines the Supreme Court’s 2026 Report on gender-sensitive judging and whether it addresses all forms of gender stereotypes: https://bit.ly/4xmKUI2 🗞️ The 2026 Report replaces the Court’s 2023 gender stereotypes handbook, which CJI Surya Kant described “too Harvard-oriented.” Our newsletter examines the questions raised by the new report: https://bit.ly/4fM6P5s 🌐 On 7 August, t…
🌺 Good Morning! 🌳 On 29 July, the Supreme Court held that the Environment (Protection) Act allows limited post-facto environmental clearances in exceptional cases. We analyse the Vanashakti litigation and it's line of precedent: https://bit.ly/4fR1yIC ⚖️ Our summary of the Vanashakti III judgement explains the limited statutory exception recognised by the Court and breaks down its findings on the key issues. Read: …
🌸 Good Morning! 🌳 On 29 July, a three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court delivered the final judgement in Vanashakti v Union of India and declared prior environmental clearance mandatory. Read: https://bit.ly/4fR1yIC 🗃️ July recorded over 95,000 pending cases. We analyse the pendency, institution and disposal trends of this year: https://bit.ly/4wDp5nz 📊 A newly launched Judicial Transparency Index scores the higher…
🌞 Good Morning! 👨🏽⚖️ Should a sitting judge engage in critical public deconstruction of settled judicial decisions? We revisit the question in light of Justice Bhuyan's recent speech: https://bit.ly/4yXUx1y 🏳️⚧️ On Monday, the Supreme Court deferred consideration of interim protection for transgender identity cards issued under the 2019 Act. Read: https://bit.ly/4yUWWtz 📬 From the constitutional validity of life…
🌄 Good Morning! 🪧 Yesterday, the Supreme Court, in the Jantar Mantar protest hearing, observed that protection from “coercive action” cannot be denied to students merely because they were previously accused in minor criminal cases. Read: https://bit.ly/4w5GRie 🏳️⚧️ Yesterday, a three-judge Bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant deferred consideration of the interim relief sought in petitions challenging the Transge…
🌸 Good Morning! 🧑🏻⚖️ Our weekend newsletter examines how recent speeches by Justice Ujjal Bhuyan have revived questions about the extent of judges’ engagement with the public. Read more: https://bit.ly/4yXUx1y 🗳️ On 30 July, the Supreme Court reserved judgement on whether the batch of petitions challenging the ECI Appointments Act, 2023 should be referred to a Constitution Bench. Hearing report: https://bit.ly/3TK…
🌺 Good Morning! 🗳️Yesterday, the Supreme Court reserved judgement on whether the batch of petitions challenging the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 should be referred to a Constitution Bench. Our hearing report: https://bit.ly/3TKmauD 🪧 Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard a petition seeking a ban on metallic pellet guns a…
🍃 Good Morning! 🪧 The Supreme Court’s interim order in the crackdown on student protests provides substantial relief to petitioners but postpones the independent inquiry that its own prima facie findings appear to require. We analyse: https://bit.ly/44WdVhy 📢 On Tuesday, the Court restrained the authorities from taking coercive action against students who participated in the protests. It observed that the agitation…
🌼 Good Morning! 🪧 Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard submissions from petitioners on the recent student protest and directed that the police brutality allegations warranted an independent inquiry. Our hearing report: https://bit.ly/4c8wtip 🧑🏻⚖️ Yesterday, the Court began hearing review petitions challenging the three-year practice rule for entry-level judges. Petitioners argued that the experience rule discouraged…
🌅 Good Morning! ⚖️ Today, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a batch of petitions alleging police brutality in the recent student protests. The Court observed yesterday that all agitations cannot justify police excess: https://bit.ly/4vTpMrO 📬 Volume 7 Issue 4 of the Supreme Court Observer Law Reports (SCO.LR) shortlists five notable judgements from 20 July to 24 July 2026: https://bit.ly/4wK5G4B 📊 We break do…
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @scobserverupdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Supreme Court Observer” (@scobserverupdates), 5,016 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scobserverupdates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.