Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Law Prep | Judiciary Preparation

Channel

Law Prep | Judiciary Preparation

@LawPrepJudiciary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,566subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001916444098
TypeChannel
Username@LawPrepJudiciary
DescriptionWe offer expert guidance, comprehensive study materials, legal insights and updates for RJS, DJS, GJS, BJS, UPPCSJ, HJS, JJS. To know more, visit https://www.lawpreptutorial.com/
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LawPrepJudiciary

Growth

23,54723,57423,560.511 August 2026 — 23,547 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,548 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,569 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,574 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,566 subscribers23,56611 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 5 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,543–23,578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:5323,566-8
14 Aug 2026, 13:5823,574+5
13 Aug 2026, 02:3423,569+21
12 Aug 2026, 05:0223,548+1
11 Aug 2026, 14:3023,547first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.75%
avg views ÷ 23,566 subscribers
Avg views / post
883
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.255%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 64 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held64 (9 August 202616 August 2026)
Views total56,503
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,630
Videos
15
Links
4,970

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱2230.1%
2027.4%
👍1115.1%
🤯912.3%
💯79.59%
🫡45.48%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC490 viewsread 16 August 2026
Poll

Revision by the High Court is provided under:

  1. Section 10712%
  2. Section 11317%
  3. Section 11414%
  4. Section 11557%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC547 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Poll

An application for review of a judgment is primarily governed by:

  1. Section 9617%
  2. Section 10014%
  3. Section 11449%
  4. Section 11520%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😱1

16 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC587 views0 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Poll

Rejection of plaint is dealt with under:

  1. Order VI Rule 1712%
  2. Order VII Rule 1169%
  3. Order VIII Rule 16%
  4. Order IX Rule 1313%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC589 views0 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Poll

Fundamental Duties are contained in:

  1. Part III9%
  2. Part IV22%
  3. Part IVA65%
  4. Part V3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC674 views0 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Poll

Undue influence is defined under:

  1. Section 1513%
  2. Section 1639%
  3. Section 1731%
  4. Section 1817%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC643 viewsread 16 August 2026
Poll

The separation of the judiciary from the executive is mentioned in:

  1. Article 4812%
  2. Article 4912%
  3. Article 5048%
  4. Article 5128%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC693 viewsread 16 August 2026
Poll

The principle of Equal Justice and Free Legal Aid is provided under:

  1. Article 324%
  2. Article 39A77%
  3. Article 445%
  4. Article 51A14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC895 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Poll

A caveat is provided under:

  1. Section 1448%
  2. Section 148A79%
  3. Section 1517%
  4. Section 1526%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

15 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC894 viewsread 16 August 2026
Poll

The power of the Supreme Court to grant Special Leave to Appeal is contained in:

  1. Article 1319%
  2. Article 13660%
  3. Article 14320%
  4. Article 14512%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC861 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Poll

The doctrine of Basic Structure is primarily associated with:

  1. Golaknath case4%
  2. Kesavananda Bharati case87%
  3. Maneka Gandhi case5%
  4. Minerva Mills case3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @LawPrepJudiciary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 46 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz174 voters

Revision by the High Court is provided under:

  1. Section 10712%
  2. Section 11317%
  3. Section 11414%
  4. Section 11557%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz167 voters

An application for review of a judgment is primarily governed by:

  1. Section 9617%
  2. Section 10014%
  3. Section 11449%
  4. Section 11520%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz190 voters

Rejection of plaint is dealt with under:

  1. Order VI Rule 1712%
  2. Order VII Rule 1169%
  3. Order VIII Rule 16%
  4. Order IX Rule 1313%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz206 voters

Fundamental Duties are contained in:

  1. Part III9%
  2. Part IV22%
  3. Part IVA65%
  4. Part V3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz224 voters

The separation of the judiciary from the executive is mentioned in:

  1. Article 4812%
  2. Article 4912%
  3. Article 5048%
  4. Article 5128%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz219 voters

Undue influence is defined under:

  1. Section 1513%
  2. Section 1639%
  3. Section 1731%
  4. Section 1817%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

English Grammar Quiz ™
@SSC_English_Grammar_Quiz · 205,328
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Law Prep | Judiciary Preparation” (@LawPrepJudiciary), 23,566 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LawPrepJudiciary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.