Photo, posted without a caption
👌5

Channel
@lira_pp
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,860subscribers
-304 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001749340936 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lira_pp |
| Description | ❗️Думаешь что бекон, макароны, пельмени это зло😳 ❌Нет!!! Давай все это есть и стройнеть Включена Роскомнадзором в перечень персональных страниц https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6736102005391b3bfb53b900®istryType=bloggersPermission #D2PKB |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lira_pp |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:26 | 16,860 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:46 | 16,866 | -10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:35 | 16,876 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:57 | 16,881 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:34 | 16,885 | -8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:15 | 16,893 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 16,896 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:36 | 16,900 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 16,905 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:44 | 16,908 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:55 | 16,911 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 16,913 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:51 | 16,918 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:05 | 16,922 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 16,925 | -6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:41 | 16,931 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:49 | 16,934 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:07 | 16,941 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:00 | 16,942 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:04 | 16,943 | first reading |
42 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (31 July 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 6,311 |
| Reactions total | 100 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 04:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,004 reactions across 39 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 416 | 41.4% | |
| 🔥 | 180 | 17.9% | |
| 👍 | 155 | 15.4% | |
| 😁 | 48 | 4.78% | |
| 🙈 | 46 | 4.58% | |
| 🤣 | 42 | 4.18% | |
| 😍 | 35 | 3.49% | |
| 🥴 | 34 | 3.39% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 2.39% | |
| 👌 | 13 | 1.29% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 0.896% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,004 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VSb5wpwcTL | 1 | 30 August 2026 | 30 August 2026 |
| 2VSb5wrRbjg | 1 | 31 August 2026 | 31 August 2026 |
| 2VSb5yGFjJa | 1 | 31 October 2026 | 31 October 2026 |
| 2VSb5z2m1ii | 1 | 31 July 2026 | 31 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 31 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Из-за того, что месяц не занималась, произошел откат в теле. И я не про жир сейчас, а про ощущения. Особенно остро я ощутила это вчера, когда скрючилась за компом, как улитка. В Краснодаре, массажист сразу сказала - проблема с осанкой, занимайся ей. И холки не будет, и дыхание лучше будет, отеки уменьшатся. Решила сегодня сделать сразу 2 тренировки, всего 35 минут - Красивая осанка - Пилатес для новичков ‼️ Проблемы…
👌7👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
👌5
Всем привет♥️ С режимом беда((( а если нет нормально сна, то жир уходит очень плохо( Уснула в 3 ночи и в 6:30 проснулась…. Выспалась😂 К 9 часам я проголодалась, было решено пойти прогуляться до Семерочки, набрала чего хотела🥹 Кд🤷🏻♀️ направилась в сторону дома, и решила позавтракать на пляже. В прошлом году мы много встречались с моими подписчиками, с кем-то группой ездили на разные экскурсии Самое запоминающиеся мом…
❤15🔥6👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤16👍2🔥1
Вчера тренировку пропустила, КД начались. А я то и думаю, что это у меня за 1 день на весах плюс 1,2 кг) Потом как поняла))) Употела сегодня мама дорогая, то в планке, то ножкой эть-эть надо делать. Хочу чередовать программы, буду делать еще тренировки на осанку, а еще надо с тазовым дном работать, еще бы с мячиками моими любимыми😂 Короч) хочу все и сразу, но тогда выходит больше часа, а я столько не хочу 🙈
❤11👍5
Всем привет ♥️ В интернете с 26 числа «гуляли» видео с кричащими заголовками - Пхукет ТОПИТ. На Сурине вообще все нормально было, терпеть не могу людей, которые хайпуют раздувая то, чего нет на самом деле. Да, дожди 27-28 были просто без остановки, но не все районы за топило…. Сегодня же солнечная погода, будто и ничего не бывало. Я без машины, поэтому в дожди дома сидела, а сегодня вот прогулялась. Еда есть - поэто…
❤🔥21❤4
🌿 Сегодня последний день лета. И до Нового года осталось совсем немного времени. Если не хочется в декабре, в очередной раз, пытаться срочно привести себя в форму за пару недель, начать заниматься своим телом можно уже сейчас ❤️ Не обязательно устраивать себе марафон «с понедельника новая жизнь». Иногда достаточно просто начать регулярно двигаться и постепенно сделать это привычкой. У FITSTARS можно взять доступ нав…
❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰1
Всем большое спасибо за рекомендации. Как и сказали, отварила, потом тушила с луком и чесноком, в конце сванская соль, паприка и сливки, соль и перец, водичку. Для бульона - курицу обжарила в жаровне, потом варила с овощами. Завтра надо будет снова что-то готовить…. Видимо будет печень
❤18🔥6😁1
Ну вот теперь все стало понятно, почему некоторые продукты пахнут тухляком. Если бы до завтра полежали, стали бы все такие, и естественно, выкинула бы. Перед тем, как поехать в магазин, сделала тесто на пряники, тоже из Таниного сборника. Пряники на Пхукете стоят как сам сборник, как только он вышел, я сразу купила без раздумий, потому что рецепт картошки хотела😂 а по факту, еще не сделала. Ну ничего, после пряников …
❤17🔥11
Девчонки, приветик. Кто как желудочки готовит? Я их готовила пару раз, потому что долго готовятся. В магазине кроме них ничего не было, взяла, Дима вроде их любит. расскажите, кто как готовит?
❤10
Мне тут в инсте задали вопрос, а вам правда нравится FitStars, или вы только рекламируете её? Если бы только рекламировала, то в обычные дни я бы не занималась. Да и занимаюсь я, в первую очередь, для своего здоровья. Сидим криво, ходим криво, дышим не полной грудью, плечи завернуты, у кого-то шея болит, у меня вот проблемы с поясницей, и я в первую очередь решаю ее. И чтобы нормализовать работу тела, понадобится не…
❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @lira_pp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Irak_pp” (@lira_pp), 16,860 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lira_pp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.